[Plone-developers] Re: Moving forward

[Christian H. <he...@fa...>]

Alexander Limi wrote:
> Personally, I think there needs to be an incentive to get AT1.3 
> shipping  with Warp. So I would suggest that if (and only if) it's 
> possible to  migrate AT1.2-based types to AT1.3, ATCT gets included. If 
> it doesn't  work, we continue with a parallel experimental release of 
> AT1.3 and ATCT.

If we don't merge the tiran-atct-integration branch we really should 
merge the tiran-plip30 branch. It's containing the required rewrite of 
some methods in Portal and Membership tool to make Plone play nice with 
the CMF api.

Before the fixes Plone wasn't using invokeFactory to create the members 
folder or some other objects. It was using some *ugly* cheating which is 
breaking ATCT.

Also the branch contains some cleanups. With cleanups I'm talking about 
removed unnecessary imports detected by the importchecker of zope3.

All these changes are tested in the atct integration branch.

> Anyone up for trying to get 1.2->1.3 migration working? I think this is  
> the best incentive there is to make this move forward. ATCT is fscking  
> *nice*, I'm an addict. :)

At first we have to fix at least the 6 critical AT bugs.
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?group_id=75272&atid=543430

Damn ... now there are 7!

Christian