#9 extra patches applied in filters

[Mark Wong]

2.6.8.1-mm1.bz2, patch-2.6.8-rc3.bz2, should not be in
the list patch-2.6.8-rc4.bz2. This occurs with several
other patches.

https://www.osdl.org/plm-cgi/plm?module=filter_output&id=20420

Welcome to the [ Apply Patch ] Filter V1.2

Version information for host [ plm-000 ]
gcc: 3.2.2
ccache: 2.2
patch: 2.5.4

md5sum of available source [.patch .gz .bz2]
6eeffc4914862861804d4ff0a0817070 plm-3258.patch
b4ab55f82af626007a5d10cf068e16aa plm-3259.patch
c2026293b0cce1c030ff6706ce57f5b7 2.6.8.1-mm1.bz2
d6b40dceead64f86b70ca4e99521ecbc patch-2.6.8-rc3.bz2
3fa26816f4e298daccae3e94ec6c8144 patch-2.6.8-rc4.bz2
2a3f5c4e5249bd424d8b0cf47498adab
postgresql-8.0.0beta1.tar.bz2

RESULT: PASS
RESULT-DETAIL: There are no indications of a failed apply
patching file src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 370 with fuzz 2 (offset 22 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 416 with fuzz 2 (offset 8 lines).

[Judith Lebzelter]

Logged In: YES
user_id=716953

This means the directories are not getting cleaned up properly from
previous runs before the next run. The extra patches are not, however,
being applied.

I am not sure where those files ( ie patch-2.6.8-rc4.bz2) came from, as
if they are patches, they should be named plm-*.patch (In PLM). Only
the base versions retain their original name.

This should not be this way and is confusing the output. PLM needs a
better clean-up routine.