From: Pierre C. <pca...@pa...> - 2006-02-01 00:32:57
|
Thanks. I personnaly don't care about sick scans timestamps, but it=20 seems that ma boss does, because his boss want timestamps. I will use that! Tank you very much. Pierre Brian Gerkey a =E9crit : > > On Jan 31, 2006, at 3:45 PM, Pierre Castella wrote: > >> Is there no way, as when using C++ lib, to have a kind of "senttime"=20 >> timestamp, which would be much more precise? > > > Every libplayerc proxy structure has as its first member a field =20 > (usually called 'info') of type playerc_device_t. This structure in =20 > turn has a field 'datatime,' which is the timestamp that the driver =20 > attached to the data currently sitting in the proxy (that's the most =20 > precise estimate you'll get of when the underlying phenomenon occurred). > > For example, if you have a playerc_laser_t* called 'laser', you want =20 > laser->info.datatime (it's a double, representing seconds from the =20 > epoch). > > brian. > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log=20 > files > for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes > searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=3Dlnk&kid=3D103432&bid=3D230486&dat= =3D121642 > _______________________________________________ > Playerstage-users mailing list > Pla...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/playerstage-users > > --=20 Pierre Castella Chemin des Triaudes 11-230 CH-1024 Ecublens Switzerland Tel: +41 76 407 62 22 http://www.bambulan.com pie...@ep... |