Re: [Plastic-devs] VOQuest + PLASTIC

[John T. <jon...@gm...>]

Coming in rather late...I agree...let's change the documentation to fit 
the reality.  I don't think anyone but you two guys currently support 
the message anyhow.
J

Mark Taylor wrote:
> On Tue, 9 May 2006, Thomas Boch wrote:
>
>   
>>> With hindsight I'd say that the way the change was made was suboptimal -
>>> if the parameter list change had been
>>>
>>>    (String votable) -> (String votable, String id)
>>>
>>> rather than
>>>
>>>    (String votable) -> (String id, String votable)
>>>       
>> Note that the current version of Aladin incorrectly expects that the
>> parameter list is (String votable, String id) ...
>>     
>
> I didn't realise that - in that case since we (well, I) agree it's 
> better that way, and that's what Aladin does, it might be best 
> to declare that the bug is in the specification and just change that.
> Is there code anywhere which uses this method in the declared 
> (String id, String votable) form?
>
> Mark
>
>