From: Thomas W. <to...@us...> - 2013-03-31 20:04:57
|
Additional info: It looks like we got the SVN repo auto-migrated but *fortunatly* no one used the new location since the import. The last revision stamp was: spec-files-extra 2012-12-11 kenmays [r5095] SFEsdl-ttf.spec: bump to 2.0.11 (for the *NEW* repo location, so please don't start using that new location for the moment) Any thoughts, should we give "git" or any other SCM on Sourceforge a try? Until then we can commit to the old repository location, but that one might become read-only any day soon. Regards, Thomas On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 09:40:04PM +0200, Thomas Wagner wrote: > > Hi all, > > I'm wondering whats the right thing to do with the > sourceforge SVN repository. > > Maybe I'm missing a step on my side and this needs > updating to a new SVN URL and merging recent cahnges. > I'm getting emails from the sourceforge platform that > I use a old repository location and this needs fixing. > > Now the main questions are, do we have two repositories > (old and new) and what is the repository *we* the > maintainers are committing to? I believe most of > us commit to the *old* svn repo. > > Maybe no one has yet committed to the new location, > then we need to set the old location read-only now. > Then change the local repository URL and commit all > diffs since the creation of the new repository. > > Well, what should we do? Take the chance to switch > to *git* (or alternatives) and make the old SVN > repository a read-only-copy of the new git repo > to keep the old read-only customers? > > sourceforge provides a few pages with informations on > that svn upgrade: > http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/community-docs/Subversion/ > http://sourceforge.net/p/forge/community-docs/SVN%20and%20project%20upgrades/ > > (our project was upgraded before Dec-12 2012) > > Maybe we just jump into the cold water and switch > to a better SCM then svn is *now*. Especially if > we only have the old SVN repo but not a new one > yet (I didn't create one myself....so we don't > have a new one?) > > Ideas and discussion welcome. This email typed in a > little hurry (sorry). > > If you have no ideas or no preferences, just let us know > with a short note. > > Regards, > Thomas -- -- Thomas Wagner ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Service rund um UNIX(TM), Wagner Network Services, Thomas Wagner Solaris(TM), Linux(TM) Eschenweg 21, 89174 Altheim, Germany Novell(TM), Windows(TM) TEL: +49-731-9807799, FAX: +49-731-9807711 Telekommunikation, LAN, MOBILE/CELL: +49-171-6135989 Internet-Service, Elektronik EMAIL: wa...@wa... |