Re: [Gaim-cabal] smileys

[Nathan W. <fac...@fa...>]

Sean Egan wrote:
> On 9/11/06, Nathan Walp <fac...@fa...> wrote:
>> I'm not opposed to this idea (I'll wait until I see it for real for
>> that), but I am worried that using emblems like that will cause more
>> truncation (of both the name and the away message) than we really want.
>
> Look at your buddy list. Count how many people have even a single
> non-status emblem. Consider that our blist layout currently allows us
> to "overlap" columns. That is, having emblems to the right won't
> truncate people who don't have emblems.
>
> -s.
I misread, I thought all emblems (including away/dnd/etc) were going to 
the right.  After carefully re-reading, now my response just sounds dumb.

-Nathan