From: Rob F. <ro...@fa...> - 2003-04-02 16:53:20
|
My view on the matter is that the ChangeLog will contain a list of new features and other major changes. This is the way we've done it since the initial release, so I intend on continuing to do it the same way. I probably acted a little rude yesterday with my hasty response. However, I was sick and therefore a bit irritable. My main problem comes from the fact that some expect what is in CVS to be release-quality. They don't want a half completed feature. If some UI is not fully implemented then they will complain. That is mostly what I was complaining about. The changes made yesterday are an exception being that it was April Fool's day. Rob > Scott Henson <deb...@si...> writes: > > > Perhaps interface changes can be discussed on this list as well. That > doesn't seem to be happening, and when a user asks a question about > them here, they get the stock "it's CVS. Things change. Deal with it. > Read the Logs." > > Which, of course, are after the fact. (Still hoping the input on top > is an April Fools change.) > |