From: Luke S. <lsc...@us...> - 2005-11-11 17:29:01
|
On Fri, Nov 11, 2005 at 11:21:01AM -0600, benni. wrote: > Hey everybody, > > Luke Schierer wrote: > >>last week anyway, and I would not be terribly upset if it took till > >>January or February to have a beta we are willing to stand behind as > >>feature complete, as long as we remember to keep looking at 2.0.0 and > >>keep our minds off 1.5.0.... > > > > > >I'd rather release without any voice or video than wait another > >couple months. I think voice and/or video aside we really are fairly > >close now. > > But actually, this is like THE feature (v/v), all the people are waiting > for. > If we just say: Okay, since 1.5.0 we rewrote status-handling / some > visual gimmicks I would call this 1.6.0 or 1.7.0, not 2.0.0. Of course Then I'd reply that you need to read the faq at gaim.sf.net/faq.php#q110 > this is an important part, but I also think that if 2.0.0 would come out > with voice AND video, (and this means, this would take another few > months), and since it is also announced on the project page, we would > finally make a lot of people, who weren't happy with gaim yet, happy. > > 2.0.0 should really be a big step forward to what the goal is: A IM > client that just works and can do everything a user wants. 2.0.0 is just what 1.0.0 is: a version that changes the existing API in such a way that plugins will have to not just be recompiled, but potentially rewritten. luke > > greetings, > benni. > |