[Gaim-devel] Fw: [Gaim-commits] CVS: gaim/src/protocols/silc ft.c,1.7,1.8

[Mark D. <ma...@ki...>]

Ahem, perfect example of why everyone should always use the patch tracker :-)
-Mark

---------- Forwarded Message -----------
From: Luke Schierer <lsc...@us...>
To: gai...@li...
Sent: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 07:53:40 -0700
Subject: [Gaim-commits] CVS: gaim/src/protocols/silc ft.c,1.7,1.8

Update of /cvsroot/gaim/gaim/src/protocols/silc
In directory sc8-pr-cvs1.sourceforge.net:/tmp/cvs-serv10557/src/protocols/silc

Modified Files:
	ft.c 
Log Message:
(10:37:16) rizzo: wtf that silc ft patch still not in
(10:38:45) LSchiere2: rizzo: what are you talking about
(10:39:03) rizzo: gaim silc won't build against silc 1.0
(10:39:16) rizzo: has been an issue since gaim 1.3.0
(10:39:29) LSchiere2: I don't recall the patch
(10:39:32) rizzo:
http://www.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/net-im/gaim/files/gaim-1.3.0-silc-ft.patch
(10:39:41) rizzo: I thought I got it from you guys
(10:39:46) LSchiere2: is it in our tracker?
(10:39:51) rizzo: I don't see it
(10:40:05) ***rizzo digs up his bug
(10:40:57) rizzo: LSchiere2: I think pekka emailed it to -packagers list
(10:41:01) rizzo: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92251
(10:41:33) rizzo: from his email:
(10:41:33) rizzo: Enclosed a small patch that makes the Gaim compile with
SILC Toolkit 1.0.
(10:41:33) rizzo: We had unfortunate timing when I released 1.0 at the
same time you
(10:41:33) rizzo: released Gaim 1.3 so I didn't have time to make the
patch for 1.3.
(10:41:33) rizzo: Anyway, the patch removes code that really isn't
supposed to even be
(10:41:33) rizzo: there...
------- End of Forwarded Message -------