From: Sean E. <sea...@gm...> - 2005-06-21 21:57:29
|
On 6/21/05, Luke Schierer <lsc...@us...> wrote: > Right now we have a significant body of users, most but not all of > whom primarily use MSN, that totally do not understand what an alias > is, and what it is not.\ The larger confusion, of course, is account aliases, but I submit that MSN users don't get aliases. > However, that particular dialog is not like the various > other dialogs that the request api sometimes generates, that pop up > unexpectedly.=20 The main usability benefit here is from direct manipulation as described in the HIG, not reducing dialogs, although I think that's a welcome side-benefit. > I think that having a dialog as opposed to inline > editing gives us a place to try to state what an alias is, Currently, the text reads "Enter an alias for BuddyName" which does nothing to that affect. > whereas I > fully expect that with the inline editing, we will have users > thinking they are changing the actual screenname, or that their > change will be reset by a server-change (the way ICQ changes for > example often are). The question is whether this is outweighed by the benefits inline alias edi= ting. Either way, I presume the UI for renaming groups is perfectly acceptable. |