From: Luke S. <lsc...@us...> - 2005-01-10 20:18:24
|
On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 02:48:36PM -0500, Sean Egan wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:57:04 -0600, Tim Ringenbach <om...@ho...> wrote: > > Luke Schierer wrote: > > > > >Right now, the status is active on all "enabled" accounts unless you > > >specifically set otherwise. if we default "enabled" to "yes" as we > > >remove it, the change would be that all accounts by default come online > > >at all times (unless you tell gaim otherwise). combine this with a > > >memory of what state we last quit with, and i think it _should_ work > > >fairly well. > > > > > If we automaticly migrate "autologin = FALSE" to "tell gaim otherwise", > > it might not be so bad. > > I'm not sure what Luke is talking about, but currently we're migrating > auto-login to "enabled." I'm not even changing what the attribute is > called in the XML file because there's nothing like gaim_prefs_rename > for accounts, and if there were it probably still wouldn't be worth > calling. i was working with etan's idea as i understand it. IF we get rid of enabled, and IF we agree that you don't want to have to edit every state to use a new account, THEN there needs to be a default whether there is one now or not. I was under the impression that we were defaulting to "not enabled" which is offline in any status, and thus removing enabled would default to offline. luke > > -s. |