Re: [phpwslistings-dev] Listing Class = FatCat Category

[Don S. <do...@se...>]

I wonder if we shouldn't implement this change immediately and put the 
brakes on 0.2.0.  If we agree that using FatCat is the way to go, then I'd 
rather do it right the first time.

What do you gents think.

Don.

On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Don Seiler wrote:

> Hm this never even occured to me.
> 
> It sounds like a good idea from the off.  Perhaps there might be downsides 
> to using fatcat though that we have not thought of.
> 
> Don.
> 
> On Sat, 29 Mar 2003, Mike Windsor wrote:
> 
> > Would it be a good idea to use FatCat categories for the classes instead of
> > making our own class?  It would be cool if it could work that way, then if
> > you were to write an article for say "Real Estate", it would show "Related
> > Items" in a block such as the listings and calendar events or anything else
> > tied to that category.
> > 
> > Mike
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> > The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
> > NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
> > http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
> > _______________________________________________
> > phpwslistings-developers mailing list
> > php...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwslistings-developers
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> The Definitive IT and Networking Event. Be There!
> NetWorld+Interop Las Vegas 2003 -- Register today!
> http://ads.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/redirect.pl?keyn0001en
> _______________________________________________
> phpwslistings-developers mailing list
> php...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwslistings-developers
> 
> 
>