From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-03-02 12:59:56
|
Micki Kaufman schrieb: > Was wondering if you'd had a chance to bulletproof 'IncludeSiteMap' yet. I'm just fighting with the culprit extractSection(). Some other plugins use that also. PS: from this wednesday on I am on a film festival for one week. So I will have not much time there. > Thanks so much for bringing it into the code base - it's so close to > being complete! > Micki > >> Reini's rewrite of IncludeSiteMap looks great, but needs a bit more >> bugproofing. >> >> Right now, it appears not to load the included pages on the second >> page load. In addition, it's unclear how to bypass the reclimit and >> includepages defaults, to allow inclusion of a page's full content and >> modify the depth of recursion. >> >> Anyone else using IncludeSiteMap - can you verify? >> >> Thanks! >> Micki >> >>> Hi Reini. Testing my migrated wiki in my test environment - 1.3.8 >>> looks good! >>> >>> One question with my tests re: 'IncludeSiteMap' - For document >>> chunking (Single-source), we need full, quiet includes as in the >>> original. >>> >>> Currently, it's defaulted to 50 words, and I can't seem to make a >>> change by editing the IncludeSiteMap source. If you have a moment, do >>> you mind helping me figure out how can I accomplish this? -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |
From: Micki K. <mic...@co...> - 2004-03-09 06:38:25
|
Hi there - let me know when I should pull down the fresh code and give it a spin. Hoep you had/have fun at the festival! Micki At 1:55 PM +0100 3/2/04, Reini Urban wrote: >Micki Kaufman schrieb: >>Was wondering if you'd had a chance to bulletproof 'IncludeSiteMap' yet. > >I'm just fighting with the culprit extractSection(). >Some other plugins use that also. > >PS: from this wednesday on I am on a film festival for one week. >So I will have not much time there. > >>Thanks so much for bringing it into the code base - it's so close >>to being complete! >>Micki >> >>>Reini's rewrite of IncludeSiteMap looks great, but needs a bit >>>more bugproofing. >>> >>>Right now, it appears not to load the included pages on the second >>>page load. In addition, it's unclear how to bypass the reclimit >>>and includepages defaults, to allow inclusion of a page's full >>>content and modify the depth of recursion. >>> >>>Anyone else using IncludeSiteMap - can you verify? >>> >>>Thanks! >>>Micki >>> >>>>Hi Reini. Testing my migrated wiki in my test environment - 1.3.8 >>>>looks good! >>>> >>>>One question with my tests re: 'IncludeSiteMap' - For document >>>>chunking (Single-source), we need full, quiet includes as in the >>>>original. >>>> >>>>Currently, it's defaulted to 50 words, and I can't seem to make a >>>>change by editing the IncludeSiteMap source. If you have a >>>>moment, do you mind helping me figure out how can I accomplish >>>>this? >-- >Reini Urban >http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ -- Micki mailto:mic...@co... |
From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-03-09 12:42:39
|
Micki Kaufman schrieb: > Hi there - let me know when I should pull down the fresh code and give > it a spin. > > Hoep you had/have fun at the festival! sure I had! > At 1:55 PM +0100 3/2/04, Reini Urban wrote: >> Micki Kaufman schrieb: >>> Was wondering if you'd had a chance to bulletproof 'IncludeSiteMap' yet. >> >> I'm just fighting with the culprit extractSection(). >> Some other plugins use that also. couldn't find an error here yet. works for me like a charm unfortunately. >> PS: from this wednesday on I am on a film festival for one week. >> So I will have not much time there. >> >>> Thanks so much for bringing it into the code base - it's so close to >>> being complete! >>> Micki >>> >>>> Reini's rewrite of IncludeSiteMap looks great, but needs a bit more >>>> bugproofing. >>>> >>>> Right now, it appears not to load the included pages on the second >>>> page load. In addition, it's unclear how to bypass the reclimit and >>>> includepages defaults, to allow inclusion of a page's full content >>>> and modify the depth of recursion. >>>> >>>> Anyone else using IncludeSiteMap - can you verify? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> Micki >>>> >>>>> Hi Reini. Testing my migrated wiki in my test environment - 1.3.8 >>>>> looks good! >>>>> >>>>> One question with my tests re: 'IncludeSiteMap' - For document >>>>> chunking (Single-source), we need full, quiet includes as in the >>>>> original. >>>>> >>>>> Currently, it's defaulted to 50 words, and I can't seem to make a >>>>> change by editing the IncludeSiteMap source. If you have a moment, >>>>> do you mind helping me figure out how can I accomplish this? <?plugin IncludeSiteMap page=HomePage includepages="quiet=0" ?> -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |