From: Micki K. <mic...@co...> - 2004-03-09 06:38:25
|
Hi there - let me know when I should pull down the fresh code and give it a spin. Hoep you had/have fun at the festival! Micki At 1:55 PM +0100 3/2/04, Reini Urban wrote: >Micki Kaufman schrieb: >>Was wondering if you'd had a chance to bulletproof 'IncludeSiteMap' yet. > >I'm just fighting with the culprit extractSection(). >Some other plugins use that also. > >PS: from this wednesday on I am on a film festival for one week. >So I will have not much time there. > >>Thanks so much for bringing it into the code base - it's so close >>to being complete! >>Micki >> >>>Reini's rewrite of IncludeSiteMap looks great, but needs a bit >>>more bugproofing. >>> >>>Right now, it appears not to load the included pages on the second >>>page load. In addition, it's unclear how to bypass the reclimit >>>and includepages defaults, to allow inclusion of a page's full >>>content and modify the depth of recursion. >>> >>>Anyone else using IncludeSiteMap - can you verify? >>> >>>Thanks! >>>Micki >>> >>>>Hi Reini. Testing my migrated wiki in my test environment - 1.3.8 >>>>looks good! >>>> >>>>One question with my tests re: 'IncludeSiteMap' - For document >>>>chunking (Single-source), we need full, quiet includes as in the >>>>original. >>>> >>>>Currently, it's defaulted to 50 words, and I can't seem to make a >>>>change by editing the IncludeSiteMap source. If you have a >>>>moment, do you mind helping me figure out how can I accomplish >>>>this? >-- >Reini Urban >http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ -- Micki mailto:mic...@co... |