You can subscribe to this list here.
2000 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(103) |
Jul
(105) |
Aug
(16) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(78) |
Nov
(36) |
Dec
(58) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2001 |
Jan
(100) |
Feb
(155) |
Mar
(84) |
Apr
(33) |
May
(22) |
Jun
(77) |
Jul
(36) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(183) |
Oct
(74) |
Nov
(235) |
Dec
(165) |
2002 |
Jan
(187) |
Feb
(183) |
Mar
(52) |
Apr
(10) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(19) |
Jul
(43) |
Aug
(90) |
Sep
(144) |
Oct
(144) |
Nov
(171) |
Dec
(78) |
2003 |
Jan
(113) |
Feb
(99) |
Mar
(80) |
Apr
(44) |
May
(35) |
Jun
(32) |
Jul
(34) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(30) |
Oct
(57) |
Nov
(97) |
Dec
(139) |
2004 |
Jan
(132) |
Feb
(223) |
Mar
(300) |
Apr
(221) |
May
(171) |
Jun
(286) |
Jul
(188) |
Aug
(107) |
Sep
(97) |
Oct
(106) |
Nov
(139) |
Dec
(125) |
2005 |
Jan
(200) |
Feb
(116) |
Mar
(68) |
Apr
(158) |
May
(70) |
Jun
(80) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(52) |
Sep
(92) |
Oct
(141) |
Nov
(86) |
Dec
(41) |
2006 |
Jan
(35) |
Feb
(62) |
Mar
(59) |
Apr
(52) |
May
(51) |
Jun
(61) |
Jul
(30) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(12) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(34) |
2007 |
Jan
(49) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(9) |
Jun
(38) |
Jul
(17) |
Aug
(31) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(34) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(8) |
2008 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(16) |
Mar
(14) |
Apr
(6) |
May
(4) |
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(9) |
Aug
(36) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(3) |
2009 |
Jan
(14) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(16) |
May
(2) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(11) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
2010 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
|
Mar
(13) |
Apr
(11) |
May
(18) |
Jun
(44) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(14) |
Oct
|
Nov
(6) |
Dec
|
2011 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(3) |
Apr
(2) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2012 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(3) |
Mar
(11) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
|
2013 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2014 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
(8) |
Dec
(1) |
2015 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
(3) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(2) |
2016 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2017 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2018 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2020 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(3) |
Jun
|
Jul
(5) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(6) |
Sep
(3) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2022 |
Jan
(11) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2023 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(3) |
Dec
(3) |
2024 |
Jan
(7) |
Feb
(2) |
Mar
(1) |
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2025 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Matthew P. <mp...@de...> - 2004-06-01 01:07:57
|
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 03:42:52AM -0700, Dmitry M. wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 12:17:25PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > > Aristedes Maniatis schrieb: > > >OK. That is good to know. I am not running Debian, but is there a 1.3.= 7=20 > > >tar somewhere or is it only possible to fetch that version out of CVS? > >=20 > > 1.3.7 is not on sf.net anymore, and I don't consider 1.3.7 stable=20 > > enough. Compared to 1.3.9 and 10. > > I fixed about 60 bugs that were in 1.3.7 and before. >=20 > 1.3.7 is still available from debian software repository > (http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/phpwiki). It's pretty > embarassing actually. In what way is it embarassing? I have a codebase and set of features that I know well enough, and have kneaded most of the bugs out of. I'm quite happy to track stable branches, as they come out, but keeping up to date with (and triaging) unstable, potentially quite buggy, releases is quite beyond my limited time, especially when I've got to try cherry-picking fixes out of CVS, with it's "every file is tracked separately" mentality. I am planning on packaging one of the newer releases in the near future, for a gforge module someone is packaging separately, but trying to find the time for it is somewhat difficult, because I have to not only update the packaging, but test both fresh installs and upgrades from a good half-dozen previous versions to ensure I'm not going to get hate-mail from people whose databases I've just trashed. And the reports from people that various things don't work in 1.3.10 doesn't fill me with joy, either. If you'd like to take the package over in Debian, feel free. I'm even happy to sponsor your uploads until you pass through NM. > If you really want 1.3.7, all you need to do is download the deb and > untar it. It will untar into a debian specific tree, but you shouldn't > have any problems. Or you can just download the .orig.tar.gz, which will get you exactly what was downloaded from SourceForge, without *any* Debian-specific (or even general-purpose) changes. - Matt |
From: Micki K. <mic...@co...> - 2004-05-31 18:21:18
|
Reini, Carsten, Steve, Jeff - Check out these articles on Business Week magazine. Corporate use of wiki's for documentation should increase dramatically in the coming months and years - we need to get phpwiki strong and stable (and NOT too bloated), to attract attention and positive mention in this arena! http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_23/b3886138.htm http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/04_23/b3886141.htm Here in our wiki environment, we're still stuck on my modified 1.3.4 for my 100-person team... we need a new version, but I too am having little success in trying to get a stable recent release up - I downloaded 1.3.10 and it has major problems with the include_paths. This time, I get a fatal error: Fatal error: main(): Failed opening required 'DB.php' (include_path='.:/Library/WebServer/Documents/phpwiki') in /Library/WebServer/Documents/phpwiki/lib/WikiDB/backend/PearDB.php on line 7 I tried all the options, like INCLUDE_PATH = ".:/Library/WebServer/Documents/phpwiki" and SCRIPT_NAME = /Library/WebServer/Documents/phpwiki/index.php DATA_PATH = /phpwiki PHPWIKI_DIR = /Library/WebServer/Documents/phpwiki etc. I DON'T wanna have to change all the include statements to absolutes... what's going on here? In the past, i could count on it 'finding itself', etc., without such deep tweaks - but now, it's fatal error city. I know many fixes are coming, but PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE, let's concentrate next on bulletproofing, avoiding feature creep and easy deployment! Phpwiki is the best wiki out there, can be GREAT for corporate use with a few mods like pdfs, includes and toc, but the expectations for easy install are high indeed! Otherwise, open source looks fragile to finicky corporate types... I'll continue to hone my skills on the code base, but it's very difficult to familiarize yourself with the code when ou cannot get the wiki to work at all... Thanks, Micki -- Micki mailto:mic...@co... |
From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-05-31 12:17:06
|
Malcolm Ross Kinsella Ryan schrieb: > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:30:20PM +1000, Malcolm Ross Kinsella Ryan wrote: >>On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:11:39AM +1000, Malcolm Ross Kinsella Ryan wrote: >> >>>Is there any plan to upgrade the TexToPng plugin for recent versions >>>of PhpWiki, or better yet, to produce a plugin that outputs valid MathML? >>>It would be very useful for a wiki I am running. >> >>I've been twiddling around and I've made a very simple plugin which >>just passes its argstr through itex2MML and then displays it. It all seems >>to work, producing correct MathML, but Mozilla seems to have some issues >>with displaying it. >> >>If I take the output of itex2MML and put it into a file called "foo.xhtml" >>it will display properly. Put it into "foo.html" and it will not. The >>MathML in wiki pages are being displayed in the same kind of wrong way. >>This is far too deep magic for me to grok. Any of you gurus have any ideas? > > With a bit more poking around, I've discovered that I can get it to work > if I change: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> > > to: > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0//EN" > "http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/dtd/xhtml-math11-f.dtd"> > > But I can't find where in the code the original line is output. themes/default/templates/html.tmpl We should change that to support SVG and MathML, similar to body and head extensions introduced to support EDIT_TOOLBAR, JS_SEARCHREPLACE, Sidebar CSS and javascript. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |
From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-05-31 12:05:29
|
>> I haven't tested this out with IE yet. And for IE you you to install a plugin, like MathPlayer (free, requires IE 6.0) http://www.dessci.com/en/products/mathplayer/ Looks fine. or Techexplorer plugin. See also http://www.w3.org/Math/XSL/ for the browser matrix. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |
From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-05-31 11:49:01
|
Malcolm Ross Kinsella Ryan schrieb: > I've written the plugin and got it producing valid MathML, but I > don't seem to be able to get my browser (FireFox) to display it. > > The actual Wiki page, produce with the plugin can be seen at: > http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~malcolmr/bushfire/index.php?pagename=SandBox > The MathML does not display properly. > > I have copied the output into the file: /home/malcolmr/public_html/blart.xhtml > if I open this file directly it shows the MathML correctly. > > if I access it via the URL http://www/~malcolmr/blart.xhtml, all I see is > the straight xhtml file listing. > > I have a copy of the file in /home/malcolmr/public_html/blart.html > if I open this file directly it does not display the MathML correctly. > Likewise if I access it over the web. > > I haven't tested this out with IE yet. > > I'm not very XHTML-savvy. Does anyone have any ideas how I can get this to > do the right thing? Header and namespace wise everything is correct. But you need this header: "Content-Type: application/xhtml+xml" instead of "Content-Type: text/html" which phpwiki or php sends automatically. Your server even sends it as text/plain: $ GET -esSUd http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~malcolmr/blart.xhtml GET http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~malcolmr/blart.xhtml User-Agent: lwp-request/2.06 GET http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~malcolmr/blart.xhtml --> 200 OK Connection: close Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 11:45:30 GMT Accept-Ranges: bytes ETag: "17fbd-18d0-40bad2ac" Server: Apache/1.3.29 (Debian GNU/Linux) PHP/4.3.3 Content-Length: 6352 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Last-Modified: Mon, 31 May 2004 06:37:32 GMT Client-Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 11:47:50 GMT Client-Peer: 129.94.242.40:80 Client-Response-Num: 1 and phpwiki: $ GET -esSUd http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~malcolmr/bushfire/?SandBox GET http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~malcolmr/bushfire/?SandBox User-Agent: lwp-request/2.06 GET http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~malcolmr/bushfire/?SandBox --> 200 OK Cache-Control: must-revalidate Connection: close Date: Mon, 31 May 2004 11:46:54 GMT ETag: W/"4aa174d88e7f1998ae8c0163651a3ef8" Server: Apache/1.3.29 (Debian GNU/Linux) PHP/4.3.3 Vary: Cookie Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Type: text/xhtml; charset=iso-8859-1 ..... I'll see what I can do. We need to override the Content-Type for pdf and svg also. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |
From: <mal...@cs...> - 2004-05-31 11:05:03
|
I've written the plugin and got it producing valid MathML, but I don't seem to be able to get my browser (FireFox) to display it. The actual Wiki page, produce with the plugin can be seen at: http://cgi.cse.unsw.edu.au/~malcolmr/bushfire/index.php?pagename=SandBox The MathML does not display properly. I have copied the output into the file: /home/malcolmr/public_html/blart.xhtml if I open this file directly it shows the MathML correctly. if I access it via the URL http://www/~malcolmr/blart.xhtml, all I see is the straight xhtml file listing. I have a copy of the file in /home/malcolmr/public_html/blart.html if I open this file directly it does not display the MathML correctly. Likewise if I access it over the web. I haven't tested this out with IE yet. I'm not very XHTML-savvy. Does anyone have any ideas how I can get this to do the right thing? Malcolm -- Malcolm Ryan - mal...@cs... - http://malcolmr.web.cse.unsw.edu.au "Blessed are the meek, for they will inherit the earth." -- Matt 5:5 |
From: <mal...@cs...> - 2004-05-31 11:01:24
|
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:30:20PM +1000, Malcolm Ross Kinsella Ryan wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:11:39AM +1000, Malcolm Ross Kinsella Ryan wrote: > > Is there any plan to upgrade the TexToPng plugin for recent versions > > of PhpWiki, or better yet, to produce a plugin that outputs valid MathML? > > It would be very useful for a wiki I am running. > > I've been twiddling around and I've made a very simple plugin which > just passes its argstr through itex2MML and then displays it. It all seems > to work, producing correct MathML, but Mozilla seems to have some issues > with displaying it. > > If I take the output of itex2MML and put it into a file called "foo.xhtml" > it will display properly. Put it into "foo.html" and it will not. The > MathML in wiki pages are being displayed in the same kind of wrong way. > This is far too deep magic for me to grok. Any of you gurus have any ideas? With a bit more poking around, I've discovered that I can get it to work if I change: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> to: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/dtd/xhtml-math11-f.dtd"> But I can't find where in the code the original line is output. Malcolm -- Malcolm Ryan - mal...@cs... - http://malcolmr.web.cse.unsw.edu.au "Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they will be filled." -- Matt 5:6 |
From: <mal...@cs...> - 2004-05-31 11:01:19
|
On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 02:30:20PM +1000, Malcolm Ross Kinsella Ryan wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2004 at 11:11:39AM +1000, Malcolm Ross Kinsella Ryan wrote: > > Is there any plan to upgrade the TexToPng plugin for recent versions > > of PhpWiki, or better yet, to produce a plugin that outputs valid MathML? > > It would be very useful for a wiki I am running. > > I've been twiddling around and I've made a very simple plugin which > just passes its argstr through itex2MML and then displays it. It all seems > to work, producing correct MathML, but Mozilla seems to have some issues > with displaying it. > > If I take the output of itex2MML and put it into a file called "foo.xhtml" > it will display properly. Put it into "foo.html" and it will not. The > MathML in wiki pages are being displayed in the same kind of wrong way. > This is far too deep magic for me to grok. Any of you gurus have any ideas? It has been suggested to me that I should check whether the Mime-type of the pages output is html or xhtml. I can't find where in the code this is determined. Can anyone help me? Malcolm -- Malcolm Ryan - mal...@cs... - http://malcolmr.web.cse.unsw.edu.au "Blessed are the pure in heart, for they will see God." -- Matt 5:8 |
From: Dmitry M. <dm...@la...> - 2004-05-31 10:42:45
|
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 12:17:25PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > Aristedes Maniatis schrieb: > >OK. That is good to know. I am not running Debian, but is there a 1.3.7 > >tar somewhere or is it only possible to fetch that version out of CVS? > > 1.3.7 is not on sf.net anymore, and I don't consider 1.3.7 stable > enough. Compared to 1.3.9 and 10. > I fixed about 60 bugs that were in 1.3.7 and before. 1.3.7 is still available from debian software repository (http://packages.debian.org/unstable/web/phpwiki). It's pretty embarassing actually. If you really want 1.3.7, all you need to do is download the deb and untar it. It will untar into a debian specific tree, but you shouldn't have any problems. -d |
From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-05-31 10:26:52
|
Dan schrieb: > I'm not sure if its zorloc or yourself who is doing the most work > on WikiUser in the CVS, but I had a few questions. it's me. > http://phpwiki.sourceforge.net/phpwiki/WikiUser -> dated in > 2001, says "there aint so such thing as setters and getters for > User preferences yet" this is not true anymore. > The CVS code is obviously far more up to date, but doesn't > exactly make it clear how to get and set preferences (despite, > for all appearances, providing such functionality) > > Would it be possible to get WikiUser->getPreferences() & > WikiUser->setPreferences() documented or at least an example > of its use? Please see WikiUserNew.php. WikiUser.php is not supported anymore and I'd love to delete it. WikiUser->getPreferences() gets the pref object which should be attached to the user object (and for legacy reasons to the request object also). WikiUser->setPreferences() updates this object, but the legimitate use is request->_setUser() only, because the request object, the session and cookie have to be updated also. > I must admit I'm kind of lost following it (*sigh*). pref->get(type) and pref->set(type,value) are self-documenting. set only sets the object, not the storage. since the storage methods are userobject specific (session, homepage or database), you have to call pref->updatePrefs(prefs) and then WikiUser->setPreferences(). > Another thing - when deploying PEAR packages for PHPwiki > Plugins, whats the go there? The CVS does include a /pear/ > dir, but does this mean I have to include my pear packages > there? Can I do something else? If I do incluide them, what > environment vars should i be setting? we had our own pear since the quality of pear was not enough and a lot of too old versions were around. esp. for DB. now pear matured, and we use lib/pear optionally, if you don't have your own pear in the include_path. only pear/File_Passwd.php is better than the standard pear, we force that. but there are still remaining problems with file locking (stale locks) on updates. > I hope I haven't flooded your inbox with noobish questions redirected to phpwiki-talk -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |
From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-05-31 10:15:15
|
Aristedes Maniatis schrieb: > OK. That is good to know. I am not running Debian, but is there a 1.3.7 > tar somewhere or is it only possible to fetch that version out of CVS? 1.3.7 is not on sf.net anymore, and I don't consider 1.3.7 stable enough. Compared to 1.3.9 and 10. I fixed about 60 bugs that were in 1.3.7 and before. > I've had a couple of private responses already to say that hopefully a > stable version of phpwiki will be focussed on in the future, rather than > continually adding new features at every point release. It is certainly > my experience that as an open source project becomes more mature, > development becomes structured and new features released separately to > bug fixes. Look through the email archive concerning stability goals. We had this discussion 1-2 months ago. > I am certainly new to this project's development cycle, but it concerns > me that 1.3.11 will be adding 'buddy ratings" (see here > http://www.wikilens.org/index.php/Restaurant). It seems like phpwiki is > turning into yet another CMS. Really I just wanted a wiki that works > well and if 1.3.11 adds another feature that needs further debugging.... These new features don't harm stability at all. Just some plugin and theme extensions. The rating feature is only available of you use the wikilens theme or a theme derived from wikilens. > Does anyone have experience of any other wikis which are focussed on > just the wiki aspect? We'd like to use this system for internal office > and processes documentation. We have a little experience in Drupal, but > that seems too complex for this relatively simple need. The simpliest of all is guiki. a pure html wiki. pmwiki is in a state of about 60% of phpwiki. mediawiki is quite ok, but limited to a set very special features and runs only with mysql. twiki (huge) and takkawiki come to my mind also. there are certainly more. > Obviously the programmers of this project are doing a great job, but it > might just be that their goals are not what I need to achieve. > On 31/05/2004, at 11:09 AM, Matthew Palmer wrote: >> On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 11:45:58PM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >>> Thanks for this feedback. Where would I find that list of recommended >>> patches? Looking through the cvs it doesn't look like any of the >>> branches have bug fixes patches applied to them, so it seems that most >>> of the bug fixes are mixed in with new features (and new bugs) as >>> phpWiki is being developed. So I still don't know which version to use >>> in an actual production environment. >> >> 1.3.7 works well for me and, apparently, a pile of Debian users. Not >> that I'm stretching it overly much, though. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |
From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-05-31 10:06:11
|
Aristedes Maniatis schrieb: > Thanks for this feedback. Where would I find that list of recommended > patches? I sibmitted them to the sf.net bugs site, but they are closed, because current CVS have them fixed. > Looking through the cvs it doesn't look like any of the > branches have bug fixes patches applied to them, so it seems that most > of the bug fixes are mixed in with new features (and new bugs) as > phpWiki is being developed. So I still don't know which version to use > in an actual production environment. in cvs we have no branches at all, only head. use HEAD. > > Cheers > Ari Maniatis > > > On 30/05/2004, at 10:55 PM, Reini Urban wrote: > >>> So, after all this, my question. Is phpWiki in a state suitable for >>> production use? If so, which version are people using. I can't afford >>> to spend much more time debugging. >> >> >> You can see that at http://phpwiki.sf.net/phpwiki/PhpWikiSites >> >> Use a release, with some minor recommended patches (if you need that), > > > > > --------------------------> > ish group pty ltd > http://www.ish.com.au > 7 Darghan St Glebe 2037 Australia > phone +61 2 9660 1400 fax +61 2 9660 7400 > PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8 > > -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |
From: Franois G. <fra...@fr...> - 2004-05-31 09:02:53
|
Le 31/05/04 6:03, =AB=A0Aristedes Maniatis=A0=BB <ar...@is...> a =E9crit=A0: > Does anyone have experience of any other wikis which are focussed on > just the wiki aspect? TWiki http://www.twiki.org (Perl) MoinMoin http://moin.sf.net/ (Python) I have tested both. I manage a TWiki farm for some projects. |
From: Aristedes M. <ar...@is...> - 2004-05-31 04:03:17
|
OK. That is good to know. I am not running Debian, but is there a 1.3.7 tar somewhere or is it only possible to fetch that version out of CVS? I've had a couple of private responses already to say that hopefully a stable version of phpwiki will be focussed on in the future, rather than continually adding new features at every point release. It is certainly my experience that as an open source project becomes more mature, development becomes structured and new features released separately to bug fixes. I am certainly new to this project's development cycle, but it concerns me that 1.3.11 will be adding 'buddy ratings" (see here http://www.wikilens.org/index.php/Restaurant). It seems like phpwiki is turning into yet another CMS. Really I just wanted a wiki that works well and if 1.3.11 adds another feature that needs further debugging.... Does anyone have experience of any other wikis which are focussed on just the wiki aspect? We'd like to use this system for internal office and processes documentation. We have a little experience in Drupal, but that seems too complex for this relatively simple need. Obviously the programmers of this project are doing a great job, but it might just be that their goals are not what I need to achieve. Cheers Ari Maniatis On 31/05/2004, at 11:09 AM, Matthew Palmer wrote: > On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 11:45:58PM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: >> Thanks for this feedback. Where would I find that list of recommended >> patches? Looking through the cvs it doesn't look like any of the >> branches have bug fixes patches applied to them, so it seems that most >> of the bug fixes are mixed in with new features (and new bugs) as >> phpWiki is being developed. So I still don't know which version to use >> in an actual production environment. > > 1.3.7 works well for me and, apparently, a pile of Debian users. Not > that > I'm stretching it overly much, though. > > - Matt > --------------------------> ish group pty ltd http://www.ish.com.au 7 Darghan St Glebe 2037 Australia phone +61 2 9660 1400 fax +61 2 9660 7400 PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8 |
From: Matthew P. <mp...@he...> - 2004-05-31 01:11:06
|
On Sun, May 30, 2004 at 11:45:58PM +1000, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > Thanks for this feedback. Where would I find that list of recommended > patches? Looking through the cvs it doesn't look like any of the > branches have bug fixes patches applied to them, so it seems that most > of the bug fixes are mixed in with new features (and new bugs) as > phpWiki is being developed. So I still don't know which version to use > in an actual production environment. 1.3.7 works well for me and, apparently, a pile of Debian users. Not that I'm stretching it overly much, though. - Matt |
From: Aristedes M. <ar...@is...> - 2004-05-30 13:46:05
|
Thanks for this feedback. Where would I find that list of recommended patches? Looking through the cvs it doesn't look like any of the branches have bug fixes patches applied to them, so it seems that most of the bug fixes are mixed in with new features (and new bugs) as phpWiki is being developed. So I still don't know which version to use in an actual production environment. Cheers Ari Maniatis On 30/05/2004, at 10:55 PM, Reini Urban wrote: >> So, after all this, my question. Is phpWiki in a state suitable for >> production use? If so, which version are people using. I can't afford >> to spend much more time debugging. > > You can see that at http://phpwiki.sf.net/phpwiki/PhpWikiSites > > Use a release, with some minor recommended patches (if you need that), --------------------------> ish group pty ltd http://www.ish.com.au 7 Darghan St Glebe 2037 Australia phone +61 2 9660 1400 fax +61 2 9660 7400 PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8 |
From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-05-30 12:53:07
|
Aristedes Maniatis schrieb: > I am in a rather frustrating position with phpWiki. I'd very much like > to use this project and I've spent at least 6-8 hours debugging and > fixing things in it so far. My progress: > > * 1.2.4 has a large number of bugs and doesn't correspond to the online > documentation. It appears to be largely abandoned and has had few bug > fixes applied to it for a long time. > > * 1.3.10 is much better. But I've had to patch several things to get it > to work, taking some parts of the current cvs repository. I was still > stuck since I couldn't get it to store users/password into the mysql > database without throwing an error in DB_Session.php. Also if I set > GROUP_METHOD = NONE then errors were thrown all over the place. > > * nightly cvs seems to be still broken. I get an error: > > Fatal error: Call to undefined function: getauthparam() in > /usr/local/www/phpwiki/lib/WikiUserNew.php on line 1609 > > Lines like this in config.ini don't help diagnostics: > > ; Db: Use $DBAuthParams[] (see below) with the PearDB or > ; ADODB only. > > But $DBAuthParams doesn't appear below or anywhere else in config.ini. > > It appears that getauthparam() is defined in lib/WikiDB.php, but why > isn't it being seen? You caught me in the middle of changing the API to access the DB globals. $GLOBALS['DBParams'] and $GLOBALS['DBAuthParams'] are gone. DB_Session was renamed to DbSession. As soon as this is fully tested (as always: it works for me, ...), 1.3.11 will be released. With some minor pending additions: edit toolbar icons, wikilens stuff: 2h work and some discussion with dfrankow. some fixes and a lot of new files. > So, after all this, my question. Is phpWiki in a state suitable for > production use? If so, which version are people using. I can't afford to > spend much more time debugging. You can see that at http://phpwiki.sf.net/phpwiki/PhpWikiSites Use a release, with some minor recommended patches (if you need that), but not a CVS since May 27. (though it works on sf.net and for me) Today is such a good weather, it was raining the last whole week, so I will make a break now. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |
From: Reini U. <ru...@x-...> - 2004-05-30 12:42:50
|
Aristedes Maniatis schrieb: > Sorry to be answering my own question here... I've just merged the patch > from cvs on this file. I've added only this line: > > include_once(dirname(__FILE__)."/pear/File_Passwd.php"); // same style > as in main.php > > at line 2103. Should I bother trying to apply this patch in the port, or > will 1.3.11 be released soon? You can do that, buit see the updated RelaseNotes on the demo site what else will be fixed in 1.3.11. It will be released soon. In about 2-3 days. (hopefully) I'm just adding the latest work from the wikilens group, with calculated recommendations, the buddie features, and all columns sortable. -- Reini Urban http://xarch.tu-graz.ac.at/home/rurban/ |
From: Aristedes M. <ar...@is...> - 2004-05-30 07:45:03
|
I am in a rather frustrating position with phpWiki. I'd very much like to use this project and I've spent at least 6-8 hours debugging and fixing things in it so far. My progress: * 1.2.4 has a large number of bugs and doesn't correspond to the online documentation. It appears to be largely abandoned and has had few bug fixes applied to it for a long time. * 1.3.10 is much better. But I've had to patch several things to get it to work, taking some parts of the current cvs repository. I was still stuck since I couldn't get it to store users/password into the mysql database without throwing an error in DB_Session.php. Also if I set GROUP_METHOD = NONE then errors were thrown all over the place. * nightly cvs seems to be still broken. I get an error: Fatal error: Call to undefined function: getauthparam() in /usr/local/www/phpwiki/lib/WikiUserNew.php on line 1609 Lines like this in config.ini don't help diagnostics: ; Db: Use $DBAuthParams[] (see below) with the PearDB or ; ADODB only. But $DBAuthParams doesn't appear below or anywhere else in config.ini. It appears that getauthparam() is defined in lib/WikiDB.php, but why isn't it being seen? So, after all this, my question. Is phpWiki in a state suitable for production use? If so, which version are people using. I can't afford to spend much more time debugging. Cheers Ari Maniatis --------------------------> ish group pty ltd http://www.ish.com.au 7 Darghan St Glebe 2037 Australia phone +61 2 9660 1400 fax +61 2 9660 7400 PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8 |
From: Aristedes M. <ar...@is...> - 2004-05-30 04:50:10
|
Sorry to be answering my own question here... I've just merged the patch from cvs on this file. I've added only this line: include_once(dirname(__FILE__)."/pear/File_Passwd.php"); // same style as in main.php at line 2103. Should I bother trying to apply this patch in the port, or will 1.3.11 be released soon? Cheers Ari Maniatis On 30/05/2004, at 1:26 PM, Aristedes Maniatis wrote: > This has been reported before, but no one has answered. I know other > people have this same problem. This happens when I try to create a new > user: > > Fatal error: Cannot instantiate non-existent class: file_passwd in > /usr/local/www/phpwiki/lib/WikiUserNew.php on line 2122 > > This is the only thing stopping me finalising the new FreeBSD port > I've created. Any ideas? Where should this class be coming from? Is > there a way to check what paths are being used by PHP? I am a > programmer, but know little PHP. > > Ari Maniatis > > > > --------------------------> > ish group pty ltd > http://www.ish.com.au > 7 Darghan St Glebe 2037 Australia > phone +61 2 9660 1400 fax +61 2 9660 7400 > PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g > Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle > 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Phpwiki-talk mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk > > --------------------------> ish group pty ltd http://www.ish.com.au 7 Darghan St Glebe 2037 Australia phone +61 2 9660 1400 fax +61 2 9660 7400 PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8 |
From: Aristedes M. <ar...@is...> - 2004-05-30 03:26:22
|
This has been reported before, but no one has answered. I know other people have this same problem. This happens when I try to create a new user: Fatal error: Cannot instantiate non-existent class: file_passwd in /usr/local/www/phpwiki/lib/WikiUserNew.php on line 2122 This is the only thing stopping me finalising the new FreeBSD port I've created. Any ideas? Where should this class be coming from? Is there a way to check what paths are being used by PHP? I am a programmer, but know little PHP. Ari Maniatis --------------------------> ish group pty ltd http://www.ish.com.au 7 Darghan St Glebe 2037 Australia phone +61 2 9660 1400 fax +61 2 9660 7400 PGP fingerprint 08 57 20 4B 80 69 59 E2 A9 BF 2D 48 C2 20 0C C8 |
From: Dmitry M. <dm...@la...> - 2004-05-29 09:57:13
|
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 08:20:40PM +0200, Reini Urban wrote: > Please do so. > Enhancements, esp. with the stylesheet are appreciated. Cool. I've been thinking about this for a while.. so far I've created a a category plugin. I'm trying to figure out how to integrate it all nicely. I'm interested in creating something that looks like a typical weblog but has phpwiki as a backend. So some thoughts/ideas: o todays posts (if more than one post they must be summarized) o comments for every post that can be managed by the blog's owner o entries can belong to multiple categories, and are generally indistinguishable from "normal" wiki entries o Archives - month/year o RSS feeds Most of these seem to be doable (I'm still learning the code). One problem that I can't quite figure a nice solution to is this. Assuming I have a blogspace (something like DmitrysWeblog/*, where * are entries) how do I prevent people from going in and creating DmitrysWeblog/StupidEntry? I hope that made sense. I haven't looked through the permissions subsystem at all yet, so I have no idea how it could be done. Either way, I'll apreciate any and all comments. -D PS: At first, I rather stupidly sent this message to Reini directly. My apologies. |
From: Dmitry M. <dm...@la...> - 2004-05-29 09:55:04
|
On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 10:35:55AM +0200, Fran?ois Granger wrote: > FYI a guy has done a really interesting job on this, but not published it: > > http://the.taoofmac.com/space Yup, I've seen it. As far as I can tell he doesn't do anything anything special, and has no "blog-features" (archives, etc). His blog is simply a wiki entry. I want something more sophisticated. I actually found that page when I was googling for "wiki + blog". That's how I started with phpwiki :) -d |
From: Franois G. <fra...@fr...> - 2004-05-29 08:36:00
|
Le 28/05/04 20:12, =AB=A0Dmitry M.=A0=BB <dm...@la...> a =E9crit=A0: > Hello all. >=20 > I'm just curious if anyone is working on producing a more complete blog > system based on phpwiki. >=20 > If noone is I'm thinking of doing it myself shortly. FYI a guy has done a really interesting job on this, but not published it: http://the.taoofmac.com/space |
From: Electrawn <ele...@el...> - 2004-05-28 20:35:04
|
Version I'm running can't handle ' (an apostrophe) in the page name for any of the remove, rename, replace functions. Has this been updated in current versions? -Electron I've stopped 7,716 spam messages. You can too! One month FREE spam protection at www.cloudmark.com |