From: Felipe L. <wi...@ig...> - 2004-11-12 04:11:53
|
Hi there Steve! Well....Honestly I dun like the idea of using PEAR's native DB class for some reasons: 1) Our class is more then enough - yes, we must clean it up a bit (a lot?); 2) Professional servers do have PEAR installed most probably, but personal servers, just some (maybe a few) have; 3) I like the idea of phpsqliteadmin been an easy to install thing that would work almost out of the box; 4) Never used PEAR and had trobles the time I tried LOL As I said to you on ICQ, I'd rather get DB class out of PEAR and use it, but then it would be the same of using our class. I do understand that it is a key decision since if we change it down the road we will have to edit more stuff. IMO, changing it equals time lost. Felipe Lopes Em 11 Nov 2004, Steve Dibb escreveu: >Ok guys, > >I've been spouting this dream of mine to use PEAR's native DB class as >the backend API for connecting to the SQLite database, and here's how I >think it can be done. > >There's two reasons I want to use the DB class though -- one, it's >installed with almost every php installation and it's very nice class >(well documented too), and two, I'm already really familiar with it. :) > >Anyway, this email is my proposal on ditching the old class, and >integrating the parts that PEAR's doesnt support into PSA, and how it >can be done. > >http://sdibb.frogcircus.org/psa/psa_class_conversion.html > >I put together a quick spreadsheet that has four columns: > >SPLSQLite - has the functions of the old class you guys were using, and >as nice as I think it is, I have no problems about abandoning it since >DB.php already supports half the functions (as you'll see), and the >other half can be put into the PSA class. > >DB - If there's an entry in the column, then that value can replace that >function of the old class. In almost every case it's probably going to >take a bit of manipulation and code cleanup to use DB instead. > >PSA - The new class I already started working on, which will pick up any >slack that DB can't handle, and at the same time pick up any functions >that psa is using right now and integrate them in as well. The PSA >class of course won't be limited to just that stuff, but that will be >some if of its main functions. > >PHP - The actual php functions that the PSA class would use. > >What do you guys think? I hope my little spreadsheet makes some sense. :) > >I can go ahead and start on the class conversion, but I just wanted to >make sure we're all on the same page, and you guys don't think it's a >bad idea using PEAR instead or anything. > >Steve > >------------------------------------------------------- >This SF.Net email is sponsored by: >Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE >LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. >http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click >_______________________________________________ >Phpsqliteadmin-devel mailing list >Php...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpsqliteadmin-devel > >---------- Felipe Lopes. _________________________________________________________________________________ Quer mais velocidade? Só com o acesso Aditivado iG, a velocidade que você quer na hora que você precisa. Clique aqui: http://www.acessoaditivado.ig.com.br |