Menu
▾
▴
phpesp-devel — Discussion of the development of phpESP
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2002 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
(103) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(45) |
Jun
(49) |
Jul
(55) |
Aug
(11) |
Sep
(47) |
Oct
(55) |
Nov
(47) |
Dec
(8) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2003 |
Jan
(43) |
Feb
(85) |
Mar
(121) |
Apr
(37) |
May
(33) |
Jun
(33) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(34) |
Sep
(58) |
Oct
(68) |
Nov
(31) |
Dec
(9) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(13) |
Feb
(57) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(26) |
May
(57) |
Jun
(14) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(12) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(10) |
Nov
(7) |
Dec
(12) |
| 2005 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
(25) |
Mar
(50) |
Apr
(20) |
May
(32) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(83) |
Aug
(25) |
Sep
(17) |
Oct
(14) |
Nov
(32) |
Dec
(27) |
| 2006 |
Jan
(24) |
Feb
(15) |
Mar
(46) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(6) |
Jun
(9) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(5) |
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(7) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2007 |
Jan
(4) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
(7) |
Apr
(3) |
May
(4) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2008 |
Jan
(94) |
Feb
(19) |
Mar
(32) |
Apr
(46) |
May
(20) |
Jun
(10) |
Jul
(11) |
Aug
(20) |
Sep
(16) |
Oct
(12) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
|
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
(9) |
Mar
(37) |
Apr
(65) |
May
(15) |
Jun
|
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(4) |
Nov
(21) |
Dec
(5) |
| 2010 |
Jan
(35) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(8) |
Apr
|
May
(4) |
Jun
(3) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2011 |
Jan
|
Feb
(4) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(1) |
Aug
|
Sep
(1) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Matthew G. <gr...@mu...> - 2002-07-06 14:17:02
|
Bulk Import is in progress. In general I/we don't push stuff up to CVS until it's in a semi-working state. BTW. Complaints don't get development done any faster, but monetary compensation would probably grease the machinery quite a bit :) On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 12:37:30PM +0200, Creative Minds wrote: > Hi gentlemen, > > Just checked through the CVS and noticed that no changes has been made > for the last 12 days. May I be a bit rude and ask what the status is > for the "Back Button" assigned to Jimmerman and the "Bulk import" > assigned to Greggmc? > > Perhaps any bugfixes? > > Oh, I appologize for this "stress" e-mail as I'm not currently doing > any code contribution myself =(. I just think that a reminder might > speed things up a bit.... > > Hope no offense is taken. > > Cheers > > CM > > >> _______________________________________________ > phpESP-devel mailing list > php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel > -- one of the friendly folks in the IT Lab. --------------------------------------\ The IT Lab (http://www.itlab.musc.edu) \____________________ Probably the world's premier software development center. Serving: Programming, Tools, Ice Cream, Seminars |
|
From: James E. F. <jf...@ac...> - 2002-07-06 13:32:17
|
On Sat, 6 Jul 2002, Creative Minds wrote: > Check answers below > > 2002-07-06 04:59:16, Kon Angelopoulos > <ang...@ip...> wrote: -snip- > > > 3/ I've replied to each of the following feature > > requests you've made (573852, 573854, 573862, 573863, > > 573866) but I'm still waiting on your replies to them so > > that their evaluation can proceed. - could you please > > help out by visiting the feature requests section of > > the phpESP project and follow up. > > My Bad again... Except for on 573852 didn't see any comment there. > I've visited the others mentioned and added a comment, probably mailed > to you by now. I do hope they clear some things out and that they'll > be considered to be included / stay on request list. > > Look forward to see further comments =). -snip- > > You're right. I'm just unused to the SF system so far. Trying to get > used to it. In the request area it's not marked anywhere how many > comments that has been added, so I'm a bit confused. I'm gonna track > them better, thank you for the note mate =) I think that I can make it so that any change to a feature request gets CC'd to the devel list (the way bug works). Is anyone opposed to that idea? Well, I will set it up that way, and if you don't like it complain and I'll change it back. That should make it easier for all of us to track requests and bugs. -James |
|
From: Kon A. <ang...@ip...> - 2002-07-06 13:17:52
|
Thanks for the zip I will certainly consider it. Kon On Sat, 6 Jul 2002 20:56, Creative Minds wrote: > Check answers below > > 2002-07-06 04:59:16, Kon Angelopoulos > > <ang...@ip...> wrote: > >Gday all, > > > >Just a few quick thoughts. > >1/ I recall a post to this list a while back where someone had raised > > the use > > >of frames. I do not use frames for my designs! There are quite a few > > good > > >reasons for this, some of which have been explained. > > Yepp, already explained. My Bad =( > > >2/ Creative Minds aka Rebirth aka ......., as a follow up to one of > > James' > > >posts "join project/more suggestions" I also have a full time job > > which sees > > >me behind my desk 12 hours a day. This might help explain why there > > hasn't > > >been any activity in the last 12 days..... > > Full understanding, I hope you saw my appoligize in the same e-mail =) > > >3/ I've replied to each of the following feature requests you've made > > (573852, > > >573854, 573862,573863,573866) but I'm still waiting on your replies > > to them so > > >that their evaluation can proceed. - could you please help out by > > visiting > > >the feature requests section of the phpESP project and follow up. > > My Bad again... Except for on 573852 didn't see any comment there. > I've visited the others mentioned and added a comment, probably mailed > to you by now. I do hope they clear some things out and that they'll > be considered to be included / stay on request list. > > Look forward to see further comments =). > > >4/ I like your idea of using images for buttons (feature request: > > 577886) and > > >will be implementing them in the new design. > > > >5/ As for the new GUI. I've got 7 days off as from the 15th of this > > month so I > > >will be devoting a lot of time to finishing the new GUI and > > incorporating as > > >many feature requests as possible. So its very important that if > > you've > > >submitted feature requests please revist them and reply to any > > further > > >comments posted. > > You're right. I'm just unused to the SF system so far. Trying to get > used to it. In the request area it's not marked anywhere how many > comments that has been added, so I'm a bit confused. I'm gonna track > them better, thank you for the note mate =) > > >6/ Finally, the idea of a tree. > >I appreciate the thought that in the future we may add more security > >levels. It certainly has been something I've been thinking about as > > well and > > >if there were more hours in a day I probably would have coded > > something by > > >now but I'm not totally convinced that a tree structure is the most > >appropriate navigation tool. If I don't run out of time during my > > days off > > >I'll create a tree and an alternative approach and we can vote on it. > > I include a screenshot of a different system where you can perhaps get > some inspiration. See attached zip file... > > And not to forget... Great work gentlemen =) > > // CreativeMinds |
|
From: Creative M. <Cre...@Pu...> - 2002-07-06 11:01:45
|
Check answers below 2002-07-06 04:59:16, Kon Angelopoulos <ang...@ip...> wrote: >Gday all, > >Just a few quick thoughts. >1/ I recall a post to this list a while back where someone had raised the use >of frames. I do not use frames for my designs! There are quite a few good >reasons for this, some of which have been explained. Yepp, already explained. My Bad =( >2/ Creative Minds aka Rebirth aka ......., as a follow up to one of James' >posts "join project/more suggestions" I also have a full time job which sees >me behind my desk 12 hours a day. This might help explain why there hasn't >been any activity in the last 12 days..... Full understanding, I hope you saw my appoligize in the same e-mail =) >3/ I've replied to each of the following feature requests you've made (573852, >573854, 573862,573863,573866) but I'm still waiting on your replies to them so >that their evaluation can proceed. - could you please help out by visiting >the feature requests section of the phpESP project and follow up. My Bad again... Except for on 573852 didn't see any comment there. I've visited the others mentioned and added a comment, probably mailed to you by now. I do hope they clear some things out and that they'll be considered to be included / stay on request list. Look forward to see further comments =). >4/ I like your idea of using images for buttons (feature request: 577886) and >will be implementing them in the new design. > >5/ As for the new GUI. I've got 7 days off as from the 15th of this month so I >will be devoting a lot of time to finishing the new GUI and incorporating as >many feature requests as possible. So its very important that if you've >submitted feature requests please revist them and reply to any further >comments posted. You're right. I'm just unused to the SF system so far. Trying to get used to it. In the request area it's not marked anywhere how many comments that has been added, so I'm a bit confused. I'm gonna track them better, thank you for the note mate =) >6/ Finally, the idea of a tree. >I appreciate the thought that in the future we may add more security >levels. It certainly has been something I've been thinking about as well and >if there were more hours in a day I probably would have coded something by >now but I'm not totally convinced that a tree structure is the most >appropriate navigation tool. If I don't run out of time during my days off >I'll create a tree and an alternative approach and we can vote on it. I include a screenshot of a different system where you can perhaps get some inspiration. See attached zip file... And not to forget... Great work gentlemen =) // CreativeMinds |
|
From: Kon A. <ang...@ip...> - 2002-07-06 02:56:17
|
Gday all, Just a few quick thoughts. 1/ I recall a post to this list a while back where someone had raised the use of frames. I do not use frames for my designs! There are quite a few good reasons for this, some of which have been explained. 2/ Creative Minds aka Rebirth aka ......., as a follow up to one of James' posts "join project/more suggestions" I also have a full time job which sees me behind my desk 12 hours a day. This might help explain why there hasn't been any activity in the last 12 days..... 3/ I've replied to each of the following feature requests you've made (573852, 573854, 573862,573863,573866) but I'm still waiting on your replies to them so that their evaluation can proceed. - could you please help out by visiting the feature requests section of the phpESP project and follow up. 4/ I like your idea of using images for buttons (feature request: 577886) and will be implementing them in the new design. 5/ As for the new GUI. I've got 7 days off as from the 15th of this month so I will be devoting a lot of time to finishing the new GUI and incorporating as many feature requests as possible. So its very important that if you've submitted feature requests please revist them and reply to any further comments posted. 6/ Finally, the idea of a tree. I appreciate the thought that in the future we may add more security levels. It certainly has been something I've been thinking about as well and if there were more hours in a day I probably would have coded something by now but I'm not totally convinced that a tree structure is the most appropriate navigation tool. If I don't run out of time during my days off I'll create a tree and an alternative approach and we can vote on it. Kon On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 23:37, James E. Flemer wrote: > Also, PHP causes frames to load slowly when using sessions. > It locks the session file on each request, causing the > frames to load sequentially, rather than in parallel. So > lets try to avoid this. > > -James > > On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 fl...@gm... wrote: > > YO! good idea but please: NO frames!! more pages more mistakes more > > confusion! the system can handle it without frames...so there is actually > > no need of using frames! > > the menue should be displayed as the lowest user has "anonymous" and > > after logont it shows more like theiy are allowed to.. > > > > kind regards flobee > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Creative Minds" <Cre...@Pu...> > > To: <php...@li...> > > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 12:47 PM > > Subject: [phpesp-dev] GUI 4 > > > > > > Hi Developers, > >, > > The three new GUI is nice all of them as mentioned before. However > > their layout is very similar to eachother. Some different colorsets > > etc. > > > > Has anyone though of a left side menu in a new frame where you have a > > tree like structure where you click for instance Survey Administration > > and then the tree expands and shows the valid items? > > > > I can see a bonus by doing this. For instance if we would add security > > levels at a later stage where you have: > > > > A survey programmer > > A project manager > > A client > > A general person overviewing surveys > > > > Then you would be able to choose which of the items on the list that > > get's displayed to different security levels. So when let's say the > > developer expands a menu, all items get displayed, but if a client or > > PM expands a tree, just the items they should be able to execute will > > de displayed. This would look a lot better with a tree like structure > > in my opinion.... > > > > Any comments? > > > > // CM > > > > > > > > > > >, > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > phpESP-devel mailing list > > php...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > phpESP-devel mailing list > > php...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > phpESP-devel mailing list > php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel , |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-07-05 18:49:06
|
Feature Requests item #577888, was opened at 2002-07-05 11:49 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=577888&group_id=8956 Category: gui Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: TreeGui Initial Comment: As mentioned in the developer forum, it seems as we agree a tree like structure on the left side WITHOUT frames is a really good solution to future development. So how about implementing it. May I suggest that Kon who is the designer figure something out? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=577888&group_id=8956 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-07-05 18:46:46
|
Feature Requests item #577886, was opened at 2002-07-05 11:46 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=577886&group_id=8956 Category: gui Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Back/Forward Image Initial Comment: Instead of just using default forward/back buttons in grey, something that would look pretty good is if you can upload your own images and use them as forward or backward in a survey or submit etc. So my suggestion is that we build a new directory in Images where survey becomes a directory and specific images related to that project can be used in the survey development. This would not just concern then images at a later stage for forward/back button but for displaying images in the survey. Would be very nice... Oh by the way, to those who hasn't figured, Rebirth and Creative Minds is the same person and that's me =) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=577886&group_id=8956 |
|
From: Creative M. <Cre...@Pu...> - 2002-07-05 18:10:44
|
Agreed, No frames, but the tree solution in general is worth one or two design options right? Kon? Ideas??? // CM 2002-07-05 15:37:06, "James E. Flemer" <jf...@ac...> wrote: >Also, PHP causes frames to load slowly when using sessions. >It locks the session file on each request, causing the >frames to load sequentially, rather than in parallel. So >lets try to avoid this. > >-James > >On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 fl...@gm... wrote: > >> YO! good idea but please: NO frames!! more pages more mistakes more >> confusion! the system can handle it without frames...so there is actually no >> need of using frames! >> the menue should be displayed as the lowest user has "anonymous" and after >> logont it shows more like theiy are allowed to.. >> >> kind regards flobee >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Creative Minds" <Cre...@Pu...> >> To: <php...@li...> >> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 12:47 PM >> Subject: [phpesp-dev] GUI 4 >> >> >> Hi Developers, >> >> The three new GUI is nice all of them as mentioned before. However >> their layout is very similar to eachother. Some different colorsets >> etc. >> >> Has anyone though of a left side menu in a new frame where you have a >> tree like structure where you click for instance Survey Administration >> and then the tree expands and shows the valid items? >> >> I can see a bonus by doing this. For instance if we would add security >> levels at a later stage where you have: >> >> A survey programmer >> A project manager >> A client >> A general person overviewing surveys >> >> Then you would be able to choose which of the items on the list that >> get's displayed to different security levels. So when let's say the >> developer expands a menu, all items get displayed, but if a client or >> PM expands a tree, just the items they should be able to execute will >> de displayed. This would look a lot better with a tree like structure >> in my opinion.... >> >> Any comments? >> >> // CM >> >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >> Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >> _______________________________________________ >> phpESP-devel mailing list >> php...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >> Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. >> http://thinkgeek.com/sf >> _______________________________________________ >> phpESP-devel mailing list >> php...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel >> > > > >------------------------------------------------------- >This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek >Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. >http://thinkgeek.com/sf >_______________________________________________ >phpESP-devel mailing list >php...@li... >https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel > |
|
From: Creative M. <Cre...@Pu...> - 2002-07-05 13:51:05
|
Hi gentlemen, Just checked through the CVS and noticed that no changes has been made for the last 12 days. May I be a bit rude and ask what the status is for the "Back Button" assigned to Jimmerman and the "Bulk import" assigned to Greggmc? Perhaps any bugfixes? Oh, I appologize for this "stress" e-mail as I'm not currently doing any code contribution myself =(. I just think that a reminder might speed things up a bit.... Hope no offense is taken. Cheers CM |
|
From: James E. F. <jf...@ac...> - 2002-07-05 13:37:12
|
Also, PHP causes frames to load slowly when using sessions. It locks the session file on each request, causing the frames to load sequentially, rather than in parallel. So lets try to avoid this. -James On Fri, 5 Jul 2002 fl...@gm... wrote: > YO! good idea but please: NO frames!! more pages more mistakes more > confusion! the system can handle it without frames...so there is actually no > need of using frames! > the menue should be displayed as the lowest user has "anonymous" and after > logont it shows more like theiy are allowed to.. > > kind regards flobee > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Creative Minds" <Cre...@Pu...> > To: <php...@li...> > Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 12:47 PM > Subject: [phpesp-dev] GUI 4 > > > Hi Developers, > > The three new GUI is nice all of them as mentioned before. However > their layout is very similar to eachother. Some different colorsets > etc. > > Has anyone though of a left side menu in a new frame where you have a > tree like structure where you click for instance Survey Administration > and then the tree expands and shows the valid items? > > I can see a bonus by doing this. For instance if we would add security > levels at a later stage where you have: > > A survey programmer > A project manager > A client > A general person overviewing surveys > > Then you would be able to choose which of the items on the list that > get's displayed to different security levels. So when let's say the > developer expands a menu, all items get displayed, but if a client or > PM expands a tree, just the items they should be able to execute will > de displayed. This would look a lot better with a tree like structure > in my opinion.... > > Any comments? > > // CM > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > phpESP-devel mailing list > php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > phpESP-devel mailing list > php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel > |
|
From: <fl...@gm...> - 2002-07-05 13:26:23
|
YO! good idea but please: NO frames!! more pages more mistakes more confusion! the system can handle it without frames...so there is actually no need of using frames! the menue should be displayed as the lowest user has "anonymous" and after logont it shows more like theiy are allowed to.. kind regards flobee ----- Original Message ----- From: "Creative Minds" <Cre...@Pu...> To: <php...@li...> Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 12:47 PM Subject: [phpesp-dev] GUI 4 Hi Developers, The three new GUI is nice all of them as mentioned before. However their layout is very similar to eachother. Some different colorsets etc. Has anyone though of a left side menu in a new frame where you have a tree like structure where you click for instance Survey Administration and then the tree expands and shows the valid items? I can see a bonus by doing this. For instance if we would add security levels at a later stage where you have: A survey programmer A project manager A client A general person overviewing surveys Then you would be able to choose which of the items on the list that get's displayed to different security levels. So when let's say the developer expands a menu, all items get displayed, but if a client or PM expands a tree, just the items they should be able to execute will de displayed. This would look a lot better with a tree like structure in my opinion.... Any comments? // CM ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Bringing you mounds of caffeinated joy. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ phpESP-devel mailing list php...@li... https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel |
|
From: Creative M. <Cre...@Pu...> - 2002-07-05 13:11:46
|
Hi Developers, The three new GUI is nice all of them as mentioned before. However their layout is very similar to eachother. Some different colorsets etc. Has anyone though of a left side menu in a new frame where you have a tree like structure where you click for instance Survey Administration and then the tree expands and shows the valid items? I can see a bonus by doing this. For instance if we would add security levels at a later stage where you have: A survey programmer A project manager A client A general person overviewing surveys Then you would be able to choose which of the items on the list that get's displayed to different security levels. So when let's say the developer expands a menu, all items get displayed, but if a client or PM expands a tree, just the items they should be able to execute will de displayed. This would look a lot better with a tree like structure in my opinion.... Any comments? // CM |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-30 20:07:50
|
Bugs item #556963, was opened at 2002-05-16 16:06 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=556963&group_id=8956 Category: Admin Group: v1.4 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Douglas Hobaugh (doug868) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Can't test multi page surveys Initial Comment: on the demo site the action part of the form tag is action="/demo/index.php?where=test&sid=3429" mine is action="/phpesp/index.php" missing the query string? Might I have something setup wrong? the file /phpesp/index.php is a symbolic link to manage.php OS: SuSe linux Web server: Zeus 4.01r1 Doug ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Date: 2002-06-30 15:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14116 PHP bug reports seem to indicate this bug is a result of a Zeus/PHP bug not phpESP. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Date: 2002-06-19 15:36 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14116 Do you have "register_globals" on or off in your php.ini? If it's off, try turning it on, restart your web server and see if the problem continues. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Douglas Hobaugh (doug868) Date: 2002-05-17 12:27 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=545343 phpESP: 1.4 released on the 15th or 16th PHP: 4.1.2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Date: 2002-05-17 12:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=14116 What version of phpESP is this? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=556963&group_id=8956 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-29 16:38:50
|
Bugs item #574985, was opened at 2002-06-28 02:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=574985&group_id=8956 Category: SQL Group: None >Status: Closed >Resolution: Rejected Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mysql error ! Initial Comment: mysql syntax error on loadin phpESP.sql with phpmyadmin.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: James Flemer (jimmerman) Date: 2002-06-29 11:38 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=39444 This is probably a bug in phpmyadmin... please upgrade phpmyadmin to the latest version. Or post more details about your problem (line number of syntax error, version of phpesp, version of phpmyadmin, etc ...). Also make sure the file phpESP.sql has unix line feeds. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=574985&group_id=8956 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-28 07:43:30
|
Bugs item #574985, was opened at 2002-06-28 00:43 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=574985&group_id=8956 Category: SQL Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: mysql error ! Initial Comment: mysql syntax error on loadin phpESP.sql with phpmyadmin.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=108956&aid=574985&group_id=8956 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-26 20:58:18
|
Feature Requests item #574279, was opened at 2002-06-26 22:58 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=574279&group_id=8956 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: flobee (flobee) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: NEED a prefix for the tables Initial Comment: hi friends! i cannot update and test newer versions because i only have one running system only one database and have to care about existing tables and i cannot get run phpESP on an standart windows CPU . can you please include this simple trick!? kind regards flobee ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=574279&group_id=8956 |
|
From: James E. F. <jf...@ac...> - 2002-06-26 01:41:34
|
On Tue, 25 Jun 2002, Creative Minds wrote: > Hi James, > > Perhaps you have noticed my interest in the phpESP > project through my posts in the development mailing > list (Creative Minds). > > I'd like to help out if I can. I actually installed > Apache and MySQL and PHP in order to try the stuff out > and perhaps pick up on PHP in order to contribute. > > However I believe I would be able to contribute a lot > in the designing phase of functionality rather than as > a developer. Would you be interested in having me > joining and send a lot of feature requests? Looks like you've already sent the feature requests. ;) Clearly people submitting code is more useful, it's pretty easy to say "I want this!", but much more difficult for the developers to find time to write/test/release the code. Everyone is a volunteer on this project -- and I assume most (including myself) have real, full-time jobs which cuts down time to work on phpESP quite a bit. But it never hurts to let us know what you'd like to see be done, and one of us might actually do it. =) > For instance, I noticed a suggestion of implementing > javascript to the checkbox if someone types anything in > the field next to it. May I recommend not using > Javascript as some browsers have incompatibility with > it or let's say problems with it. My suggestion in this > case would be to keep it simple. Well, there is very minimal JS in phpESP. I detest JS, and browse in with it disabled 99% of the time. However sometimes there just aren't any clean solutions, and JS is the least of several evils (the main other evil being the lag/complexity of POSTing back to the server and maintaining server side state). > I also have a lot of ideas on the input of new > questionnaires. How about having a GUI and a > simplified scriptmethod of doing it. Details? Mock-ups? Have you seen the recently committed GUI changes from Kon? (Check out the devel version from CVS.) > Not to mention I have loads of interesting fully > functional research software with documentation that > might come in handy as reference material during the > development. Cool, as long as you don't go violating any of their license agreements. > What do you think? The randomization option is probably not that difficult, but would probably have to change the database schema. Omitting options from the randomization is a pain. Ranking questions as you describe would need JS. Percentage could be implemented with "!other" if necessary. Project overview seems quickest of the bunch, quite simple --- you could tackle this if you want to get your hands dirty learning PHP. Can you tell me more about your background, mainly, do you know PHP,SQL,CGI,HTML,JS,CVS,Perl etc... > // Creative > Minds -James (Sent to list because these are devel issues ...) |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-25 23:03:04
|
Feature Requests item #573866, was opened at 2002-06-26 01:03 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573866&group_id=8956 Category: data analysis Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fredrik Clementz (rebirth) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Project Overview Initial Comment: There should be a managers screen somewhere which doesn't just show which projects are alive, but how many interviews collected in the surveys etc. to get a brief overview of the surveys which are active. Possibly you should be able to check in when you configure a new survey what your target is (number of interviews to conduct). Then you could have the surveys coloured yellow as not started, green as active and red as finished perhaps. Surveys should be reported one line for each so you could get a simple printout for the entire day. The row ought to contain ID/Name/Conducted interviews/Target to reach/Starting date/deadline/response rate (Conducted/Target). ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573866&group_id=8956 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-25 22:56:55
|
Feature Requests item #573863, was opened at 2002-06-26 00:56 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573863&group_id=8956 Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fredrik Clementz (rebirth) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Percentage question Initial Comment: If possible a new question type ought to be added. "Divide X points / percentage". A question where the respondent have to type in numbers on the right side to a list of alternatives and which sums up to the number X defined by the survey designer. Also include a "don't know" box to skip question. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573863&group_id=8956 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-25 22:55:13
|
Feature Requests item #573862, was opened at 2002-06-26 00:55 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573862&group_id=8956 Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fredrik Clementz (rebirth) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Ranking questions Initial Comment: A new question type should be added to the question types. That would be a rank question. Let's say you have 10 different things that you'd like a respondent to rank from 1 through 10. Then a specific rank question would be needed. My suggestion is having the 10 options in a list on the left side in a randomised list and in the middle have arrows to move options to a right field, one by one. In the right field an exact same formed type of field is but where the option get's placed. Also what would be good is if you can mark an option and have arrows on the right side of it and move it up or down in the list. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573862&group_id=8956 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-25 22:48:47
|
Feature Requests item #573854, was opened at 2002-06-26 00:48 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573854&group_id=8956 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fredrik Clementz (rebirth) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Randomisation Initial Comment: Response codes inside a question should be possible to randomise. There is a psychological effect on people to influence the human mind to read from top to bottom. This means in a multiple question for instance, the top codes will most likely have a "bias" to be more clicked in rather than low response codes (top would mean higher up on the screen). So what should be done here is the option of having a randomisation box so question get's randomised. Also important here is that some items must be able to be kept in bottom such as "None of the above" or "Refuse to Answer" or "don't know". So here as in the other request there would be a need for a "no control" of certain items, or should it be called "not randomised"? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573854&group_id=8956 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-25 22:45:09
|
Feature Requests item #573852, was opened at 2002-06-26 00:45 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573852&group_id=8956 Category: survey format Group: None Status: Open Priority: 5 Submitted By: Fredrik Clementz (rebirth) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: Control questions / remove items Initial Comment: in many surveys you'd like to be able to have a list of response codes for multiple questions which you want to use in the question after. This functionality should be applied. For instance Q1 Which car brands do you recognise of the ones below? 1. Saab 2. Volvo 3. Ford 4. BMW 5. None of the above Q2 *CONTROL Q1 Which of these car brands would you consider buying? 1. Saab 2. Volvo 3. Ford 4. BMW 5. None of the above In this case, people shouldn't be able to buy a car which they don't even know of. Should be added to the features. Also you should be able to put in a no control for certain items, such as none of the above. Because if they are aware of 2 brands but wouldn't consider buying one of them, then none of the above should be displayed anyway. version 1.5? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=573852&group_id=8956 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-23 23:09:17
|
Feature Requests item #572914, was opened at 2002-06-23 18:09 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=572914&group_id=8956 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 4 Submitted By: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Assigned to: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Summary: Bulk import of respondent data Initial Comment: Add a way to bulk import respondent data from a text file. File can be formated as CSV, TAB delimited or XML. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=572914&group_id=8956 |
|
From: <no...@so...> - 2002-06-23 22:01:10
|
Feature Requests item #572894, was opened at 2002-06-23 17:01 You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=572894&group_id=8956 Category: None Group: None Status: Open Priority: 4 Submitted By: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Assigned to: Matthew Gregg (greggmc) Summary: Bulk import of respondent data Initial Comment: Add a way to bulk import respondent data from a text file. File can be formated as CSV, TAB delimited or XML. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=358956&aid=572894&group_id=8956 |
|
From: Matthew G. <gr...@mu...> - 2002-06-23 21:56:37
|
On Sun, Jun 23, 2002 at 10:37:11AM -0400, James E. Flemer wrote: > [ Please try to make your email wrap at something slightly > less than 80 characters, thanks. ] > > A few points here. Having the data fields associated with > each respondent be arbitrarily chosen by the designer is > difficult. Databases are designed to, and work best when, > the fields are pre-determined. Adding a new table per > survey to store this information is a bad idea for several > reasons. The other option is to somehow store the data in > one (or two) predefined tables -- this is sort of how the > survey questions work, its dirty and slow. > > Having a way to add respondents in bulk is certainly a good > idea. I agree that an option to import them from either > text (csv or xml) would be helpful. Yup this would be worthwhile. I'll add a feature request and work on implementing. > > When you are analyzing the data, it should be very easy to > include the rest of your respondent information. One of the > great thing about relational databases is that you can join > tables. Simple use one of the phpESP fields (username, > email, etc) as a key into your separate database with all > your custom data. This is exactly the way to go. We need to be careful not to "feature creep" a great survey tool into a lousy statistics package :) > > I am constantly amazed by people wanting to take the data > out of a database and put it in excel. To me it seems that > in doing so, you give up so many tools available in SQL. Oh > well, I suppose it's because excel is pointy-clicky, and to > take full advantage of a database requires substantial > knowledge of SQL. The answer to this is simple... People know Excel, it's easy to use and they aren't will or don't have the time to learning anything else. > It is certainly well worth learning if > you need to do any substantial data analysis. There are > also several tools to help you with this, I know that SAS > can use an ODBC database directly as a data source. > > (More at a later date on quota management.) > > -James > > On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, Creative Minds wrote: > > > Hi There, > > > > I see a lack of functionality in the respondent > > database. First of all, normally when you conduct a > > study you would not add respondents one by one but > > rather want to upload an entire set of respondents. May > > I recommend using a non-predefined format for this. > > Respondent information can be very different from > > survey to survey. > > > > I think you should focus on a Comma Separated file for > > upload with first line containing variable name. After > > that a guide (as in Excel for instance) where you > > define what kind of variable is in the field. > > > > This would be a good next phase in development before > > we head on to quota management etc. Because if have a > > survey where you need 500 males and 500 females, you > > should be able to create a field inside the survey > > which then stores values to the respondent database and > > not just to a datafile. And inside the questionnaire > > you should be able to check whether you have or do not > > have enough respondents of a certain quota group and > > make a condition to end the survey for that respondent > > with the motivation that the quota group is full. > > > > Any opinions? > > > > Sponsored by: > ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ > _______________________________________________ > phpESP-devel mailing list > php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpesp-devel > -- brought to you by, Matthew Gregg... one of the friendly folks in the IT Lab. --------------------------------------\ The IT Lab (http://www.itlab.musc.edu) \____________________ Probably the world's premier software development center. Serving: Programming, Tools, Ice Cream, Seminars |
24 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
