|
From: Ben C. <php...@be...> - 2005-06-04 22:03:01
|
I may have answered your questions in my last email, but just in case... I don't want to add anything that would cause database changes at this point, but any other patch would be fine. Ulf Erikson wrote: > * Benjamin Curtis [2005-05-14 12:54]: > >>I think the only reason the patches haven't been applied is that the >>time just slipped by me. To correct that, I've added you as a developer >>to the project so you can add your patches yourself. :) Changes should >>be applied to the HEAD. > > > What a dirty trick! ;-) It is soo much easier to complain than to fix it > myself.. but I will try to look at it, next week or so. > > Could you at least give a hint on what patches are okay to add now and > what can better wait until after 1.0? > > >>I don't have a desire to add any more features before 1.0, I just want >>work out any remaining bugs left over from the RCs. > > > Sounds wise. I guess this means that it is too late for changes to > things such as the database structure, the main queries and the > translatable strings, etc.? That would disqualify most of my patches for > now.. Another thing, some of my changes are for MySQL only. Who can help > with similar changes for the other database types? (do you normally > commit changes for one type only and add the others later? or do you > wait until changes for all types can be done at once?) > > Do you have a list of blocking bugs for 1.0? Why was RC5 named RC5 and > not 1.0? Are those issues addressed now? What is needed for RC6 and/or > 1.0? How can I best help reach there? > |