|
From: Ulf E. <ulf...@fa...> - 2005-05-23 14:42:11
|
* Ben Curtis [2005-05-19 17:34]: > Any of the patches you already made that add pieces of functionality are > fine to add. I'd rather not put in patches that are for mysql only, > though. I can help with making them work with postgres, but I'm sorely > lacking in time lately. Great. I'll take a look at my old feature patches as well. By the end of the week, I hope. > > Do you have a list of blocking bugs for 1.0? Why was RC5 named RC5 and > > not 1.0? Are those issues addressed now? What is needed for RC6 and/or > > 1.0? How can I best help reach there? > > > > Actually, I don't have a list of blocking issues. I think the code is > basically ready to go for a 1.0 release. Of course, I could be > forgetting something. :) I'd rather do 1.0 than RC6. I think the only > thing holding me back is really someone (besides me) giving me the > thumbs up that the upgrade script works just fine for a 0.9.x database. Hmm.. There have actually been a number of tumbs down for installer and upgrade scripts lately.. I suspect that this partly could be due to newer versions of php and/or mysql. I'll try to come up with something there (including the error and warning log we talked about earlier). How about a wiki page to collect information about systems where install and upgrade work or fail (and error messages, in case of failure)? If you write a short description on how to test this anyone can fill in his system specifics and results. And, if you write the first entry everyone will include as much information. I wouldn't know what parameters are of importance ;-) /Ulf |