|
From: Ulf E. <ulf...@fa...> - 2005-03-01 19:25:26
|
* Benjamin Curtis [2005-02-24 16:21]: > > Ulf Erikson wrote: > >>* Benjamin Curtis [2005-02-15 15:06]: >> >> >>>basically, users could change roles per bug, but they could have a >>>different set of permissions by virtue of their group memberships on a >>>more general basis (users in the QA group would always have CloseBug >>>permission, regardless of reporter/owner/witness role). >> >> >>Hmm.. I must have missed this earlier. Do you mean that you would like >>to difference EditStatus in permission to close a bug or not? >> >>How about other enforcements on what Statuses and Resolutions one can >>chose depending on the current status? That would finally lead to >>something similar to the WorkFlow: >>http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=648867&group_id=14939&atid=364939 >> >> > > > You know, I'm not sure that I realized the full meaning of what I was > typing until your reply, but yeah, we certainly could do a permission > per status. That would go quite a bit of the way towards workflow > customization. This quickly grows beyond what I have done.. any chance that you one day can help with sketching on what tables and fields to use and how it all ought to be connected? (i assume this will be hard to squeeze into the current structure, but maybe i am wrong) -- Ulf |