|
From: Ulf E. <ulf...@fa...> - 2005-02-20 18:47:19
|
* Benjamin Curtis [2005-02-15 15:06]: > basically, users could change roles per bug, but they could have a > different set of permissions by virtue of their group memberships on a > more general basis (users in the QA group would always have CloseBug > permission, regardless of reporter/owner/witness role). Hmm.. I must have missed this earlier. Do you mean that you would like to difference EditStatus in permission to close a bug or not? How about other enforcements on what Statuses and Resolutions one can chose depending on the current status? That would finally lead to something similar to the WorkFlow: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=648867&group_id=14939&atid=364939 There are also requests on keeping comments and/or whole bugs restricted to people with the right permissions: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=626884&group_id=14939&atid=364939 >> New user can set another reporter for bug >> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1034495&group_id=14939&atid=114939 > > This set another reporter bug is one that I'd really like to fix before > 1.0, but I haven't put enough thought yet into what is the best approach. Do you mind if I suggest more blockers? ;-) The earlier security issue should probably be revisited once more, and considering the speed of development it would probably be a very good idea to make sure that both php5 and MySQL 4.1 are possible platforms for phpBugTracker 1.0. -- Ulf |