Re: [Php-java-bridge-users] standalone JVM bridge init script

[<php...@li...>]

[Please excuse the delay]

> Easier to handle is relative, no?

May be. On Windows and Linux all you need to do is to start the graphical
software installer and install tomcat. After that it runs as a standard
system service.

> Is it *bad* to run it standalone?

Not at all. But it may not be as fast as a servlet back end with
JAVA_PERSISTENT_SERVLET_CONNECTIONS set to true.

The simple servlet engine built into JavaBridge.jar cannot handle persistent
connections (it uses http/1.0, not http/1.1). But the standalone socket
listener can use persistent connections:

java -jar JavaBridge.jar INET_LOCAL:9267

And in your php script or in java.inc set JAVA_HOSTS to "127.0.0.1:9267" and
JAVA_SERVLET to false.

Regards,
Jost Boekemeier

On Sep 14, 2009 12:26 AM, <php...@li...>
wrote:

Easier to handle is relative, no? I have -0- experience running Java
App Servers. This is why I run it standalone; it is plenty fast, has
been very reliable for me, and it's only 1 process to manage, so it's
simple for me to understand. If a java app server has problems, I have
no idea how to easily deal with it...

Is it *bad* to run it standalone? What would I gain by switching?

Alan

On Sep 13, 2009, at 6:19 PM, php-java-bridge-

us...@li... wrote: > There is one in the CVS attic. > >
However, Tomcat or JEE serv...