Re: [Phonopy-users] LDA vs PBE and phonons
Brought to you by:
atztogo
|
From: Sushil A. <sa...@gm...> - 2016-10-29 02:30:08
|
Hi, There are calculations that show that LDA gives better magnetic moments than GGA. Sushil Auluck On 29 Oct 2016 7:23 a.m., "Huan Tran" <hu...@gm...> wrote: > Bret, > > As mentioned in another post, a relaxed structure for an energy > calculation may not be relaxed for a phonon calculation. Thus, a > description of how to relax your structure is the first thing to look at. > What DFT code did you use? > > Regards > Huan > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 8:14 PM, Bret Hess <bre...@by...> wrote: > >> Haun, thanks so much for providing an explanation! >> >> To illustrate how different a result I get for LDA vs PBE phonons in >> rutile TiO2 (for the same degree of electronic convergence) in VASP, see >> https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1QmG3miCNhLmqIWEwTNfo >> kajKVCaqmR3TdBM4mWlKDck/edit?usp=sharing >> >> >> Bret >> >> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 5:18 PM, Huan Tran <hu...@gm...> wrote: >> >>> Bret and All, >>> >>> LDA is not necessarily less accurate than GGA, especially in phonon >>> calculations, due to numerical implementation. Here is a known reason, >>> which can be found at http://www.quantum-espresso.or >>> g/wp-content/uploads/Doc/ph_user_guide.pdf >>> >>> “The problem is [...] in the fact that the XC energy is computed in real >>> space on a discrete >>> grid and hence the total energy is invariant (...) only for translation >>> in the FFT grid. Increasing >>> the charge density cutoff increases the grid density thus making the >>> integral more exact thus >>> reducing the problem, unfortunately rather slowly...This problem is >>> usually more severe for >>> GGA than with LDA because the GGA functionals have functional forms that >>> vary more >>> strongly with the position; particularly so for isolated molecules or >>> system with significant >>> portions of “vacuum” because in the exponential tail of the charge >>> density a) the finite cutoff >>> (hence there is an effect due to cutoff) induces oscillations in rho and >>> b) the reduced gradient >>> is diverging.”(info by Stefano de Gironcoli, June 2008) >>> >>> Best >>> Huan >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 4:49 PM, Bret Hess <bre...@by...> wrote: >>> >>>> Sushil, I understand that LDA is less accurate in general than PBE, but >>>> I could not get the PBE to give good results for TiO2 phonons. So for now >>>> my strategy is to use LDA for phonons and PBE for everything else. >>>> >>>> Bret >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Message: 2 >>>> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 06:36:38 +0530 >>>> From: Sushil Auluck <sa...@gm...> >>>> Subject: Re: [Phonopy-users] LDA vs PBE and phonons >>>> To: phonopy-users <pho...@li...> >>>> Message-ID: >>>> <CAJ...@ma... >>>> ail.com> >>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" >>>> >>>> Did you the equilibrium lattice constants obtained by GGA and PBE for >>>> the >>>> two respective calculations ? >>>> >>>> On 26 Oct 2016 5:08 a.m., "Bret Hess" <bre...@by...> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Hi, I really appreciate the great Phonopy code, Togo that I just >>>> tried out >>>> > this week. >>>> > >>>> > I benefited from the discussion on *Persistent imaginary (negative) >>>> > frequency from phonon calculation >>>> > <https://sourceforge.net/p/phonopy/mailman/message/34969163/> >>>> *because I >>>> > was getting lots of negative frequencies for TiO2 with PBE >>>> > pseudopotentials. I tried LDA, and it was much better. I don't >>>> > understand why, but I just wanted to add my datapoint to the >>>> discussion. >>>> > >>>> > Thanks, >>>> > >>>> > Bret >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > Bret Hess >>>> > Department of Physics and Astronomy >>>> > Brigham Young University >>>> > N251 ESC >>>> > Provo, UT 84602 >>>> > 801-422-2108 >>>> > FAX 801-422-0553 >>>> > >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Bret Hess >>>> Department of Physics and Astronomy >>>> Brigham Young University >>>> N251 ESC >>>> Provo, UT 84602 >>>> 801-422-2108 >>>> FAX 801-422-0553 >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> ------------------ >>>> The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers >>>> Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise? >>>> Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. >>>> Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy! >>>> http://sdm.link/telerik >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Phonopy-users mailing list >>>> Pho...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phonopy-users >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>> ------------------ >>> The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers >>> Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise? >>> Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. >>> Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy! >>> http://sdm.link/telerik >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Phonopy-users mailing list >>> Pho...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phonopy-users >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Bret Hess >> Department of Physics and Astronomy >> Brigham Young University >> N251 ESC >> Provo, UT 84602 >> 801-422-2108 >> FAX 801-422-0553 >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ------------------ >> The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers >> Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise? >> Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. >> Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy! >> http://sdm.link/telerik >> _______________________________________________ >> Phonopy-users mailing list >> Pho...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phonopy-users >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------ > The Command Line: Reinvented for Modern Developers > Did the resurgence of CLI tooling catch you by surprise? > Reconnect with the command line and become more productive. > Learn the new .NET and ASP.NET CLI. Get your free copy! > http://sdm.link/telerik > _______________________________________________ > Phonopy-users mailing list > Pho...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phonopy-users > > |