|
From: Andreas S. <an...@sa...> - 2006-09-05 08:31:56
|
On Mon, 4 Sep 2006, Johan Viklund wrote: >> Btw, I spoke to a guy at Update the other day. He was a bit interested in >> Phli and seems to have quite a few good ideas about GUI design. He >> suggested a few design changes to make the software perform better over >> slow links, e g modem or ADSL. The changes mainly involved making a more >> sophisticated server which does the resizing (to allow different >> thumbnail sizes or low-res images for previews) and caches the results. >> What do you think about this? Should we just go ahead with the current >> plans and make sure that backend - frontend separation is good enough to >> add something like this in the future? Or should we try to implement >> something like this in the first release? > > I've always thought about it like this in a way, with a good > separation between backend and frontend. And now we need to decide on > a protocol too, wohoo! I'd rather stick to using the client-server communication exposed by the database backend until after the first release. However, if we plan this carefully, creating a new "Phli server backend" will be pretty easy. I've been thinking about using XMLRPC or something the like for the client server communication, but I'm not sure... //Andreas |