|
From: Johan V. <joh...@gm...> - 2006-09-04 20:24:01
|
> Another thing which I think we forgot to talk about during the last > meeting was how to handle photo albums. The most obvious implementation > would be to use a tag for an album, but what about order? We could > implement an index number in the image<->tag relation, but doing this has > a few pitfalls, mainly when listing the images in multiple tags or parent > tags. Albums are about presentation while tags are about organization. This separation should be made very clear. Don't mix them, ever, I don't subscribe to the idea of having a one-to-many relation between albums and photos, it's of course many-to-many. The underlying model of albums and tags is virually the same (except for albums beeing ordered). -- Johan Viklund |