Menu
▾
▴
perl-css-devel — For Perl CSS developers
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2001 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
(29) |
Sep
(2) |
Oct
(24) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2002 |
Jan
(1) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
(1) |
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(7) |
Aug
(21) |
Sep
(1) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
(13) |
Dec
(19) |
| 2004 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(1) |
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: <cas...@do...> - 2003-07-05 00:59:23
|
You Can Receive The Money You Need... To Start Your own Home Business... To Consolidate all Your Debts... College...for you or your family members To Start Your Home Business and prosper... Almost ANY Worthwhile Reason or need... GOTO http://www.xtrameg.com/gg12/ Every day millions of dollars are given away to people, just like you!! Your Government spends billions of tax dollars on government grants. Do you know that private foundations, trust and corporations are required to give away a portion of theirs assets. It doesn't matter, where you live, your employment status, or if you are broke, retired or living on a fixed income. There may be a grant for you! Who Can Apply? ANYONE can apply for a Grant from 18 years old and up! We will Help You! We will show you HOW & WHERE to get Grants. This MONEY has to be given away, WHY not to YOU? Grants from $500.00 to $50,000.00 or more are possible! GRANTS don't have to be paid back, EVER! Grants can be ideal for people who are or were bankrupt or just have bad credit. Claim your slice of the FREE American Pie, Please Visit Our Web-site Below And Place Your Order TODAY! http://www.xtrameg.com/gg12/ Don't Delay, This Is A Limited Time Offer At This Amazing Low Price! Get That Grant Now, Before College Rush Time Comes! http://www.xtrameg.com/gg12/ crey-pff-qriry^yvfgf(fbheprsbetr(arg |
|
From: <bil...@bi...> - 2003-06-30 00:27:34
|
<HTML><FONT COLOR="#ff0000" SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><B><I>How would you like to earn $50 or more for completing a short survey?<BR> <BR> What about $100 for an hour of your time participating in a focus group?</FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" BACK="#ffffff" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></B></I><BR> <BR> <A HREF="http://www.godfreyonline.net/alas/">Click Here To Sign Uo Today!</A><BR> <BR> <B><I>Your time and opinions are valuable - you just need to know<BR> which companies are willing to pay you for them. </B></I><BR> <BR> <BR> </FONT><FONT COLOR="#ff0000" BACK="#ffffff" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"><B><I>Our membership program provides....<BR> <BR> - An updated database of hundreds of paid survey, focus group, <BR> and market research companies<BR> - Unlimited access - 24 hours a day, 7 days a week </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" BACK="#ffffff" style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=2 PTSIZE=10 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" FACE="Arial" LANG="0"></B></I><BR> <BR> <BR> <A HREF="http://www.godfreyonline.net/alas/">Click Here To Sign up Today!</A><BR> <BR> <B><I>This is a great way to boost your income, with minimal effort. Best of<BR> all, you can participate in as many surveys or focus groups as you choose!</B></I></FONT></HTML> |
|
From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2003-06-28 22:24:25
|
Hi Robin,
h1 { color: attr(color, color) }
As far as I understand, DocumentHandler::property should get something
like
LexicalUnit(ATTR)
=> [
LexicalUnit(IDENT),
LexicalUnit(COMMA),
LexicalUnit(IDENT)
]
but I get
LexicalUnit(ATTR)
=> "color, color"
with CSS::SAC. Other SAC implementations like Apache Batik return what I
expected. Is this intentional or fixed in CVS?
regards.
|
|
From: <ser...@in...> - 2003-06-26 02:53:56
|
How would you like to earn $50 or more for completing a short survey? What about $100 for an hour of your time participating in a focus group? http://www.xtrameg.com/trt/ Your time and opinions are valuable - you just need to know which companies are willing to pay you for them. Our membership program provides.... - An updated database of hundreds of paid survey, focus group, and market research companies - Unlimited access - 24 hours a day, 7 days a week http://www.xtrameg.com/trt/ This is a great way to boost your income, with minimal effort.Best of all, you can participate in as many surveys or focus groups as you choose! crey-pff-qriry^yvfgf(fbheprsbetr(arg |
|
From: <bul...@ao...> - 2003-04-18 04:10:57
|
http://www.loanhunters.org/ Hello, Well you asked for it. This is the website that got me that 5.125% mortgage. You simple fill out the form and lenders compete for your business. http://www.loanhunters.org/ thanks, Richard Murphy Remove: http://www.loanhunters.bz/mort/rem/ |
|
From: World S. U. <pr...@wo...> - 2002-10-12 14:47:14
|
Your Email Client does not support MIME encoding. Please upgrade to MIME-enabled Email Client (almost every modern Email Client is MIME-capable). |
|
From: Michael B. <eb...@vo...> - 2002-01-09 21:03:13
|
<html> <body> <font SIZE="2"> <p>Dear Friend,</p> <p>When I decided to get serious about making</p> <p>money on the Internet, it seemed that</p> <p>everywhere I went, I was pointed to</p> <p>the same guy for the tools and resources</p> <p>that are CRITICAL to anyone's online</p> <p>success. In fact, after a little research,</p> <p>I discovered that this guy has...</p> <p>OVER 11,258 SITES THAT ARE</p> <p>RECOMMENDING HIM TODAY</p> <p>.... as the Internet's #1 online marketing</p> <p>resource. I just wanted to send you a quick</p> <p>e-mail to introduce you to the guy who has</p> <p>shown myself and literally thousands of</p> <p>netrepreneurs, just like you and me, how to</p> <p>earn a SERIOUS INCOME on the Internet.</p> <p>The fellow I am talking about is Corey Rudl,</p> <p>the owner of 4 extremely successful online</p> <p>businesses and author of the #1 BEST-SELLING</p> <p>Internet Marketing course. One of his web</p> <p>sites alone receives over 6,000,000 visitors</p> <p>every single year...so he must know what he</p> <p>is doing!</p> <p>When I visited his site, I was completely</p> <p>shocked by the huge volumes of Internet</p> <p>marketing tips and strategies -- critical</p> <p>to the success of your e-business -- that I</p> <p>was faced with.</p> <p>Corey has tested absolutely everything and</p> <p>will show you the EXACT RESULTS YOU CAN</p> <p>EXPECT when you start using his techniques</p> <p>because he knows what works and what</p> <p>doesn't.</p> <p>I am talking about the strategies and</p> <p>techniques like...</p> <p>- How to literally DOUBLE THE SUBSCRIBERS TO</p> <p>YOUR OPT-IN E-MAIL LIST by making this one</p> <p>simple change to your site.</p> <p>- How Corey FOOLED THE SEARCH ENGINES and</p> <p>directories into making him $51,925 in 14</p> <p>weeks, and how he still uses this</p> <p>technique to make $15,000+ per month.</p> <p>- How to INCREASE YOUR PROFITS BY UP TO</p> <p>63.8% -- by teaming up with your</p> <p>competitors.</p> <p>- How to GET 40% OF YOUR CUSTOMERS TO BUY A</p> <p>SECOND PRODUCT -- before they even leave</p> <p>your site.</p> <p>.... and this is only the tip of the iceberg.</p> <p>Corey skips the theoretical approach and</p> <p>tackles hundreds of step-by-step strategies</p> <p>that you can APPLY TO YOUR BUSINESS TODAY to</p> <p>instantly increase your profits on the</p> <p>Internet.</p> <p>When I found Corey Rudl and this extremely</p> <p>powerful information, I was so shocked that</p> <p>I could not wait -- I had to share it with</p> <p>my customers and subscribers so that you</p> <p>can reap the profits as well. </p> <a href="http://www.marketingtips.com/t.cgi/652279">So click here NOW to promote your business online</a> <p>The Internet is still moving at lightning</p> <p>speed and a resource like Corey Rudl and the</p> <p>Internet Marketing Center is absolutely</p> <p>invaluable to any netrepreneur who wants to</p> <p>SKIP THE FAILING PROMOTIONS and FAST-TRACK</p> <p>YOUR SUCCESS by knowing exactly what works,</p> <p>the moment it's discovered!</p> <p>All the best,</p> <p>Michael de Courcy</p> <p>Expert Business Marketing</p> <p>**************************************************************************</p> <p>This email is sent in compliance with our strict anti-abuse regulations. You are receiving this message for one of</p> <p>the following reasons: 1) we are on the same opt in list 2) you posted to one of my FFA pages; 3) you have</p> <p>responded to one of my ads; or 4) you have sent an e-mail to one of our addresses. By doing so, you have</p> <p>agreed to receive this message under Bill s. 1618 TITLE III passed by the 105th US Congress this letter</p> <p>Cannot be considered Spam as long as the sender includes contact information and a method of "removal". To</p> <p>be removed from future mailing, just click the link below. Thanks you for your kind consideration.</p> <p>re...@vo...</p> <p>**************************************************************************</p> </font> </body> </html> |
|
From: <gts...@ca...> - 2001-11-14 23:45:17
|
LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES, COPIER AND FAX CARTRIDGES SAVE UP TO 40% FROM RETAIL PRICE. GT TONER SUPPLIES TO ORDER BY PHONE PLEASE CALL 770-623-9780 ORDER BY EMAIL: gts...@ca... EMAIL REMOVAL: gts...@ca... UNIVERSITY AND/OR SCHOOL PURCHASE ORDERS WELCOME. (NO CREDIT APPROVAL REQUIRED) ALL OTHER PURCHASE ORDERS REQUESTS REQUIRE CREDIT APPROVAL. PAY BY CHECK, C.O.D, OR PURCHASE ORDER (NET 30 DAYS). FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE ANY QUESTION ABOUT OUR COMPANY PLEASE EMAIL US AT gt...@ca... OUR NEW, LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGE, PTICES ARE AS FOLLOWS: (PLEASE ORDER BY ITEM NUMBER) ITEM MAKE MODEL PRICE 1---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4L, 4P (74A)----------------------------- $39.00 2---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 1100 (92A)------------------------------- $39.00 3---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 2 (95A)------------------------------------$30.00 4---------- HP------------------- LASERJET SERIES 2P (75A)---------------------------------- $49.00 5---------- HP------------------- LASERJET SERIES 5P,5MP,6P,6MP (03A)---------------- $39.00 6---------- HP------------------- LASERJET SERIES 5SI,800 (09A)----------------------------$89.00 7---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 2100 (96A)------------------------------- $65.00 8---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 8100 (82X)------------------------------- $129.00 9---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 5L,6L (3906A)--------------------------- $35.00 10---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4V------------------------------------------ $89.00 11---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4000 (27X)------------------------------- $65.00 12---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 3SI,4SI (91A)---------------------------- $49.00 13---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4,4M,5,5M (98A)----------------------- $40.00 14---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 5000 (29X)--------------------------------$89.00 15---------HP--------------------LASERFAX 500, 700 (FX1) ------------------------------------$44.00 16---------HP--------------------LASERFAX 5000, 7000 (FX2)--------------------------------- $49.00 17---------HP--------------------LASERFAX (FX3)----------------------------------------------- $49.00 18---------HP--------------------LASERFAX (FX4)----------------------------------------------- $49.00 19---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA 4019,4029 HIGH YIELD------------------------------ $79.00 20---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA R 4039,4049 HIGH YIELD--------------------------- $99.00 21---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA E-----------------------------------------------------------$49.00 22---------LEXMARK---------OPTRA N----------------------------------------------------------$105.00 23---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA S-----------------------------------------------------------$145.00 24---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA T-----------------------------------------------------------$180.00 25---------EPSON-------------- ACTION LASER 7000,7500,8000,9000---------------------- $99.00 26---------EPSON-------------- ACTION LASER 1000,1500------------------------------------$99.00 27---------PANASONIC----- NEC SERIES 2 MODELS 90 AND 95------------------------ $99.00 28---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER PRO 600,16/600---------------------------- $40.00 29---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER SELECT 300,320,360----------------------$64.00 30---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER 300, 320-------------------------------------- $49.00 31---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER NT, 2NT------------------------------------- $49.00 32---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER 12/640---------------------------------------- $69.00 33---------CANON------------ FAX LASERCLASS 4000 (FX3)------------------------------ $49.00 34---------CANON------------ FAX LASERCLASS 5000,6000,7000 (FX2)---------------- $44.00 35---------CANON------------ LASERFAX 5000,7000 (FX2)--------------------------------- $44.00 36---------CANON------------ LASERFAX 8500,9000 (FX4)--------------------------------- $44.00 37---------CANON------------ COPIER PC3,6RE,7 & 11 (A30)------------------------------- $59.00 38---------CANON------------ COPIER 300,320,700,720 AND 760 (E-40)------------------ $79.00 30 DAY UNLIMITED WARRANTY INCLUDED ON ALL PRODUCTS. IF YOU ARE ORDERING BY E-MAIL OR C.O.D. PLEASE FILL OUT AN ORDER FORM WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: PHONE NUMBER COMPANY NAME FIRST AND LAST NAME STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE IF YOU ARE ORDERING BY PURCHASE ORDER PLEASE FILL OUT AN ORDER FORM WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER PHONE NUMBER COMPANY OR SCHOOL NAME SHIPPING ADDRESS AND BILLING ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE ALL TRADE MARKS AND BRAND NAMES LISTED ABOVE ARE PROPERTY OF THE RESPECTIVE HOLDERS AND USED FOR DESCRIPTIVE PURPOSES ONLY. LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES, COPIER AND FAX CARTRIDGES SAVE UP TO 40% FROM RETAIL PRICE. GT TONER SUPPLIES TO ORDER BY PHONE PLEASE CALL 770-623-9780 ORDER BY EMAIL: gts...@ca... EMAIL REMOVAL: gts...@ca... UNIVERSITY AND/OR SCHOOL PURCHASE ORDERS WELCOME. (NO CREDIT APPROVAL REQUIRED) ALL OTHER PURCHASE ORDERS REQUESTS REQUIRE CREDIT APPROVAL. PAY BY CHECK, C.O.D, OR PURCHASE ORDER (NET 30 DAYS). FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE ANY QUESTION ABOUT OUR COMPANY PLEASE EMAIL US AT gt...@ca... OUR NEW, LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGE, PTICES ARE AS FOLLOWS: (PLEASE ORDER BY ITEM NUMBER) ITEM MAKE MODEL PRICE 1---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4L, 4P (74A)----------------------------- $39.00 2---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 1100 (92A)------------------------------- $39.00 3---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 2 (95A)------------------------------------$30.00 4---------- HP------------------- LASERJET SERIES 2P (75A)---------------------------------- $49.00 5---------- HP------------------- LASERJET SERIES 5P,5MP,6P,6MP (03A)---------------- $39.00 6---------- HP------------------- LASERJET SERIES 5SI,800 (09A)----------------------------$89.00 7---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 2100 (96A)------------------------------- $65.00 8---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 8100 (82X)------------------------------- $129.00 9---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 5L,6L (3906A)--------------------------- $35.00 10---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4V------------------------------------------ $89.00 11---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4000 (27X)------------------------------- $65.00 12---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 3SI,4SI (91A)---------------------------- $49.00 13---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4,4M,5,5M (98A)----------------------- $40.00 14---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 5000 (29X)--------------------------------$89.00 15---------HP--------------------LASERFAX 500, 700 (FX1) ------------------------------------$44.00 16---------HP--------------------LASERFAX 5000, 7000 (FX2)--------------------------------- $49.00 17---------HP--------------------LASERFAX (FX3)----------------------------------------------- $49.00 18---------HP--------------------LASERFAX (FX4)----------------------------------------------- $49.00 19---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA 4019,4029 HIGH YIELD------------------------------ $79.00 20---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA R 4039,4049 HIGH YIELD--------------------------- $99.00 21---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA E-----------------------------------------------------------$49.00 22---------LEXMARK---------OPTRA N----------------------------------------------------------$105.00 23---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA S-----------------------------------------------------------$145.00 24---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA T-----------------------------------------------------------$180.00 25---------EPSON-------------- ACTION LASER 7000,7500,8000,9000---------------------- $99.00 26---------EPSON-------------- ACTION LASER 1000,1500------------------------------------$99.00 27---------PANASONIC----- NEC SERIES 2 MODELS 90 AND 95------------------------ $99.00 28---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER PRO 600,16/600---------------------------- $40.00 29---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER SELECT 300,320,360----------------------$64.00 30---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER 300, 320-------------------------------------- $49.00 31---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER NT, 2NT------------------------------------- $49.00 32---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER 12/640---------------------------------------- $69.00 33---------CANON------------ FAX LASERCLASS 4000 (FX3)------------------------------ $49.00 34---------CANON------------ FAX LASERCLASS 5000,6000,7000 (FX2)---------------- $44.00 35---------CANON------------ LASERFAX 5000,7000 (FX2)--------------------------------- $44.00 36---------CANON------------ LASERFAX 8500,9000 (FX4)--------------------------------- $44.00 37---------CANON------------ COPIER PC3,6RE,7 & 11 (A30)------------------------------- $59.00 38---------CANON------------ COPIER 300,320,700,720 AND 760 (E-40)------------------ $79.00 30 DAY UNLIMITED WARRANTY INCLUDED ON ALL PRODUCTS. IF YOU ARE ORDERING BY E-MAIL OR C.O.D. PLEASE FILL OUT AN ORDER FORM WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: PHONE NUMBER COMPANY NAME FIRST AND LAST NAME STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE IF YOU ARE ORDERING BY PURCHASE ORDER PLEASE FILL OUT AN ORDER FORM WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER PHONE NUMBER COMPANY OR SCHOOL NAME SHIPPING ADDRESS AND BILLING ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE ALL TRADE MARKS AND BRAND NAMES LISTED ABOVE ARE PROPERTY OF THE RESPECTIVE HOLDERS AND USED FOR DESCRIPTIVE PURPOSES ONLY. LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGES, COPIER AND FAX CARTRIDGES SAVE UP TO 40% FROM RETAIL PRICE. GT TONER SUPPLIES TO ORDER BY PHONE PLEASE CALL 770-623-9780 ORDER BY EMAIL: gts...@ca... EMAIL REMOVAL: gts...@ca... UNIVERSITY AND/OR SCHOOL PURCHASE ORDERS WELCOME. (NO CREDIT APPROVAL REQUIRED) ALL OTHER PURCHASE ORDERS REQUESTS REQUIRE CREDIT APPROVAL. PAY BY CHECK, C.O.D, OR PURCHASE ORDER (NET 30 DAYS). FOR THOSE OF YOU WHO HAVE ANY QUESTION ABOUT OUR COMPANY PLEASE EMAIL US AT gt...@ca... OUR NEW, LASER PRINTER TONER CARTRIDGE, PTICES ARE AS FOLLOWS: (PLEASE ORDER BY ITEM NUMBER) ITEM MAKE MODEL PRICE 1---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4L, 4P (74A)----------------------------- $39.00 2---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 1100 (92A)------------------------------- $39.00 3---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 2 (95A)------------------------------------$30.00 4---------- HP------------------- LASERJET SERIES 2P (75A)---------------------------------- $49.00 5---------- HP------------------- LASERJET SERIES 5P,5MP,6P,6MP (03A)---------------- $39.00 6---------- HP------------------- LASERJET SERIES 5SI,800 (09A)----------------------------$89.00 7---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 2100 (96A)------------------------------- $65.00 8---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 8100 (82X)------------------------------- $129.00 9---------- HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 5L,6L (3906A)--------------------------- $35.00 10---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4V------------------------------------------ $89.00 11---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4000 (27X)------------------------------- $65.00 12---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 3SI,4SI (91A)---------------------------- $49.00 13---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 4,4M,5,5M (98A)----------------------- $40.00 14---------HP--------------------LASERJET SERIES 5000 (29X)--------------------------------$89.00 15---------HP--------------------LASERFAX 500, 700 (FX1) ------------------------------------$44.00 16---------HP--------------------LASERFAX 5000, 7000 (FX2)--------------------------------- $49.00 17---------HP--------------------LASERFAX (FX3)----------------------------------------------- $49.00 18---------HP--------------------LASERFAX (FX4)----------------------------------------------- $49.00 19---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA 4019,4029 HIGH YIELD------------------------------ $79.00 20---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA R 4039,4049 HIGH YIELD--------------------------- $99.00 21---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA E-----------------------------------------------------------$49.00 22---------LEXMARK---------OPTRA N----------------------------------------------------------$105.00 23---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA S-----------------------------------------------------------$145.00 24---------LEXMARK-------- OPTRA T-----------------------------------------------------------$180.00 25---------EPSON-------------- ACTION LASER 7000,7500,8000,9000---------------------- $99.00 26---------EPSON-------------- ACTION LASER 1000,1500------------------------------------$99.00 27---------PANASONIC----- NEC SERIES 2 MODELS 90 AND 95------------------------ $99.00 28---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER PRO 600,16/600---------------------------- $40.00 29---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER SELECT 300,320,360----------------------$64.00 30---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER 300, 320-------------------------------------- $49.00 31---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER NT, 2NT------------------------------------- $49.00 32---------APPLE-------------- LASER WRITER 12/640---------------------------------------- $69.00 33---------CANON------------ FAX LASERCLASS 4000 (FX3)------------------------------ $49.00 34---------CANON------------ FAX LASERCLASS 5000,6000,7000 (FX2)---------------- $44.00 35---------CANON------------ LASERFAX 5000,7000 (FX2)--------------------------------- $44.00 36---------CANON------------ LASERFAX 8500,9000 (FX4)--------------------------------- $44.00 37---------CANON------------ COPIER PC3,6RE,7 & 11 (A30)------------------------------- $59.00 38---------CANON------------ COPIER 300,320,700,720 AND 760 (E-40)------------------ $79.00 30 DAY UNLIMITED WARRANTY INCLUDED ON ALL PRODUCTS. IF YOU ARE ORDERING BY E-MAIL OR C.O.D. PLEASE FILL OUT AN ORDER FORM WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: PHONE NUMBER COMPANY NAME FIRST AND LAST NAME STREET ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE IF YOU ARE ORDERING BY PURCHASE ORDER PLEASE FILL OUT AN ORDER FORM WITH THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: PURCHASE ORDER NUMBER PHONE NUMBER COMPANY OR SCHOOL NAME SHIPPING ADDRESS AND BILLING ADDRESS CITY, STATE ZIP CODE ALL TRADE MARKS AND BRAND NAMES LISTED ABOVE ARE PROPERTY OF THE RESPECTIVE HOLDERS AND USED FOR DESCRIPTIVE PURPOSES ONLY. |
|
From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2001-10-25 02:00:59
|
* Robin Berjon wrote:
>Yes, and this takes a lot of work to do right (says the guy that tried that
>back in the early days of CSS::Parser). But it would be a great win. I think
>we can start small (but clean) and try to build on top of that.
Yeah!
>For the forward compat rules, I don't think that should go into CSS::SAC.
Well, at least some higher-level interface to CSS::SAC to get a proper
parser if you want to do something CSS Level X specific.
>By the way, I'm not sure that CSS::Properties is a good name as we would also
>want to deal with @rules and selectors. The former are probably easier, the
>latter probably insanely hard :-) But properties is a good place start.
I thought CSS::Properties for properties, CSS::Selectors for selectors,
etc. if this was not too obvious for you ;-)
>> We can make a deal, someone provides a template for the data and I will
>> fill that template with data from CSS 1.0, CSS 2.0, SVG 1.0 and
>> occasionally CSS Level 3.
>
>Wow, I admire your courage !
Shouldn't be too hard, I can write a Perl Script to extract data, that's
why we are here :-) Prose restricitons and additions will be hard,
though.
>With sufficient reflexion on the above outlined
>schemes, I could provide you with the template. I unfortunately don't have
>the time to fill in the data.
Just do it for some properties, interesting would be
font-family
font
margin
clip
vertical-align
text-shadow
This should cover most of the not too simple cases ;-)
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
|
|
From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2001-10-24 10:52:26
|
On Tuesday 23 October 2001 22:20, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > Yes, and it is also possible to create an URI object first and then > import those symbols but I think your solution is probably the best > one. Would you mind patching it into CVS? Which solution do you prefer ? The one that consists of prefixing all the= =20 constants ? I was thinking of doing it anyway, it's much better. I can't = do=20 it now but I've added it to the TODO. --=20 _______________________________________________________________________=0D Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO=0D k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com=0D -----------------------------------------------------------------------=0D Avoid clich=E9s like the plague.=0D =0D |
|
From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2001-10-24 10:51:23
|
On Tuesday 23 October 2001 22:20, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Robin Berjon wrote: > >I haven't looked at SF's CGI features, nor in fact into anything that > > relates to how the homepage works. The latest versions are certainly not > > available by default, though installing with PREFIX could take care of > > that (c'mon Bjoern, you know how to pass an argument ;-). > > It's not that easy using CPAN.pm to get a proper PREFIX :-) cpan> o conf make_install_arg PREFIX=foo # maybe it's make_arg cpan> install Foo::Bar So no it's not that hard really :-) -- _______________________________________________________________________ Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Does the name Pavlov ring a bell? |
|
From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2001-10-23 20:21:00
|
* Robin Berjon wrote:
>I haven't looked at SF's CGI features, nor in fact into anything that relates
>to how the homepage works. The latest versions are certainly not available by
>default, though installing with PREFIX could take care of that (c'mon Bjoern,
>you know how to pass an argument ;-).
It's not that easy using CPAN.pm to get a proper PREFIX :-)
Thanks.
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
|
|
From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2001-10-23 20:21:00
|
* Robin Berjon wrote:
>On Monday 22 October 2001 01:25, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> use CSS::SAC::LexicalUnit ':constants'; imports vital constants into
>> the current namespace, so the URI constant. But I want to use the URI
>> module. Is there anything I can do to have my
>>
>> my $base = URI->new(...);
>>
>> excluding using fully qualified CSS::SAC::LexicalUnit::URI etc.pp.? If
>> not (I don't think so, though), 'URI' is probably a bad name for the
>> constant.
>
>One solution is to rename all constants to be prefixed with SAC_, make
>*those* importable with :constants, and for a while the unprefixed ones
>importable as well with :old_constants. This might be the cleanest solution.
>
>Note that you can also:
>
>*Your::Package::SAC_URI = \&CSS::SAC::LexicalUnit::URI;
>
>to get an alias usable locally as SAC_URI.
Yes, and it is also possible to create an URI object first and then
import those symbols but I think your solution is probably the best
one. Would you mind patching it into CVS?
regards,
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
|
|
From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2001-10-23 13:48:32
|
On Tuesday 23 October 2001 00:02, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Robin Berjon wrote: > >On Monday 22 October 2001 05:18, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > >> What if Text::Balanced 1.99 re-introduces this bug? :-) > >> Having a test case, we can notice it. > > > >Well... it would be a bit over the border to test other modules in our own > >distribution. > > We test only CSS::SAC which has to parse correctly, no matter what it > uses to do parsing. If other modules fail, CSS::SAC also fails. I just > don't want to get a 100% success for the tests if Text::Balanced is > outdated. Then don't worry too much, it was one of the test cases that triggered the T::B bug. Normally, CSS::SAC should refuse to install (or at least warn violently) for outdated T::Bs. Unless of course you copy it by hand to its install dir, in which case you're obviously asking for trouble. That's not to say that we don't want more test cases. Ideally, we'd test everything, and every fixed bug would get a test case to check for regression problems. It's just that tests are painful to write in normal situations, and even harder for event driven code. Thankfully, Barrie Slaymaker recently sent me a diff module that should help lots with that. -- _______________________________________________________________________ Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Make it idiot proof and someone will make a better idiot. |
|
From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2001-10-22 22:03:41
|
* Robin Berjon wrote:
>On Monday 22 October 2001 05:18, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> What if Text::Balanced 1.99 re-introduces this bug? :-)
>> Having a test case, we can notice it.
>
>Well... it would be a bit over the border to test other modules in our own
>distribution.
We test only CSS::SAC which has to parse correctly, no matter what it
uses to do parsing. If other modules fail, CSS::SAC also fails. I just
don't want to get a 100% success for the tests if Text::Balanced is
outdated.
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
|
|
From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2001-10-22 07:24:27
|
On Monday 22 October 2001 01:25, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > use CSS::SAC::LexicalUnit ':constants'; imports vital constants into > the current namespace, so the URI constant. But I want to use the URI > module. Is there anything I can do to have my > > my $base = URI->new(...); > > excluding using fully qualified CSS::SAC::LexicalUnit::URI etc.pp.? If > not (I don't think so, though), 'URI' is probably a bad name for the > constant. One solution is to rename all constants to be prefixed with SAC_, make *those* importable with :constants, and for a while the unprefixed ones importable as well with :old_constants. This might be the cleanest solution. Note that you can also: *Your::Package::SAC_URI = \&CSS::SAC::LexicalUnit::URI; to get an alias usable locally as SAC_URI. -- _______________________________________________________________________ Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- In which level of metalanguage are you now speaking? |
|
From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2001-10-22 07:21:32
|
On Monday 22 October 2001 05:18, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
> What if Text::Balanced 1.99 re-introduces this bug? :-)
> Having a test case, we can notice it.
Well... it would be a bit over the border to test other modules in our own
distribution. We might as well ship with Perl's test suite to check that it's
working fine :)
If I remember correctly, the bug was that a backslash before a newline inside
a block caused extract_bracketed to fail. The following should be a failing
sample:
{
prop: val\
ue;
}
The place for this test is, of course, Text::Balanced's own test suite.
Cooking up a test for this would be easy (if Damian hasn't already included
one). You can then submit it to him for inclusion (and wait ~three weeks for
him to reach the bottom of his mail backlog ;-)
--
_______________________________________________________________________
Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO
k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer games don't affect kids, I mean if pac man affected us as kids,
we'd all sit around in a darkened room munching pills and listening to
repetitive music.
|
|
From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2001-10-22 03:29:14
|
* Robin Berjon wrote:
>On Sunday 21 October 2001 21:38, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> Grmbl, I dunno what Sourceforge people do to their listman, but it's now
>> IIRC the third time settings get screwed. Could you please take a look
>> at them and let the listman change the Reply-to header to send replies
>> only to the list? Thanks.
>
>I don't know what's going on there. I can't find the option to set Reply-to
>and am under the impression that it might have been removed from mailman....
I cannot find any option either... grmbl.
>it with the list (which seems by far overkill). I'm afraid you're either
>going to have to configure your mailer accordingly (mine has a "this folder
>holds a list" option that remaps the reply keys for instance) or get used to
>reply-to-all.
Ok, then you get my mails twice. Not my problem :-)
>> >Go ahead and patch Bjoern !
>>
>> Done.
>
>Thanks :)
Yea, I really enjoy patching Björn ;-)
--
print just another perl hacker q;s/^\w+_}/ #+--- regards, Björn Höhrmann
;;sub _{reverse split q=:+==>[caller${\1}] #| mailto:bj...@ho...
->[3]};;sub another::just{shift&&join q> > #| http://www.bjoernsworld.de
=>_,@_};package hacker;sub perl{_}$0=~m(_) #+ http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
|
|
From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2001-10-22 03:19:36
|
* Robin Berjon wrote:
>On Sunday 21 October 2001 20:30, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> CSS::SAC needs some addtitional test cases to fail some tests if the
>> required Text::Balanced version is not installed. I don't remember what
>> made the difference (probably multiline strings, Robin probably knows
>> better), therfore I cannot recommend some...
>
>The problem was with a faulty regex in Text::Balanced. Unless you have found
>a new bug, that bug was fixed in version 1.84.
>
>The way to check that the right version is installed is normally through
>Makefile.PL's PREREQ_PM hash. Right now that part is asking that the user
>have Text::Balanced 1.84 or better, and ought to warn if it's not there (the
>CPAN shell will fetch the dependency if it fails).
>
>If people are installing it in other ways, then the only way to impose a
>version is to have SAC.pm say "use Text::Balanced '1.84'". Feel free to patch
>that if you think people may not be using Makefile.PL correctly (which would
>be silly, but you never know. And perhaps PPM doesn't work with that ?)
What if Text::Balanced 1.99 re-introduces this bug? :-)
Having a test case, we can notice it.
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
|
|
From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2001-10-21 23:26:41
|
Hi,
use CSS::SAC::LexicalUnit ':constants'; imports vital constants into
the current namespace, so the URI constant. But I want to use the URI
module. Is there anything I can do to have my
my $base = URI->new(...);
excluding using fully qualified CSS::SAC::LexicalUnit::URI etc.pp.? If
not (I don't think so, though), 'URI' is probably a bad name for the
constant.
regards,
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
|
|
From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2001-10-21 19:50:28
|
On Sunday 21 October 2001 21:38, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > Grmbl, I dunno what Sourceforge people do to their listman, but it's now > IIRC the third time settings get screwed. Could you please take a look > at them and let the listman change the Reply-to header to send replies > only to the list? Thanks. I don't know what's going on there. I can't find the option to set Reply-to and am under the impression that it might have been removed from mailman.... unless of course I dreamt and it never was there. The only option that seems to be presently available is to completely hide the actual sender and replace it with the list (which seems by far overkill). I'm afraid you're either going to have to configure your mailer accordingly (mine has a "this folder holds a list" option that remaps the reply keys for instance) or get used to reply-to-all. Unless of course someone has deeper knowledge of mailman and its web interface than I do. > >Go ahead and patch Bjoern ! > > Done. Thanks :) -- _______________________________________________________________________ Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- We are born naked, wet and hungry . Then things get worse. |
|
From: Bjoern H. <der...@gm...> - 2001-10-21 19:39:08
|
* Robin Berjon wrote:
Grmbl, I dunno what Sourceforge people do to their listman, but it's now
IIRC the third time settings get screwed. Could you please take a look
at them and let the listman change the Reply-to header to send replies
only to the list? Thanks.
>On Sunday 21 October 2001 18:31, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> CSS::SAC search for uri() functions (for the namespace declaration),
>> those don't exist in CSS, it's a historical "misnomer", i.e. it's url().
>> Is this intended? Should I go and fix it in CVS?
>
>I can find three possible occurences of the problem in the current cvs
>CSS-SAC, on lines 103, 565, and 570. It isn't intended and a previous scan
>actually eliminated a number of these problems.
Three? Oh, yes, the %FUNC_MAP, I'll patch that, too.
>Note that LexicalUnit.pm has a URI constant. This may or may not be a
>misnomer as well.
URI is fine there, just the function name matters.
>If it is, then the best thing would probably be to add a
>URL constant, but not to delete the current one (for back-compat).
>TestWriter.pm, Writer.pm may also exhibit similar problems.
Yes...
>Finally, the test file probably has the same problem and should be changed
>accordingly with the code.
>
>Go ahead and patch Bjoern !
Done.
--
Björn Höhrmann { mailto:bj...@ho... } http://www.bjoernsworld.de
am Badedeich 7 } Telefon: +49(0)4667/981028 { http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
25899 Dagebüll { PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 } http://www.learn.to/quote/
|
|
From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2001-10-21 19:12:28
|
On Monday 01 October 2001 04:37, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > CSS::SAC and CSS::DOM need some CSS::Properties module, SAC to adhere > to the forwared compatibility rules (i.e. ignore unknown properties, > ignore invalid values, etc.) if the user wants to parse some stylesheet > according to some specified CSS version, DOM to resolve shorthand > properties to the real properties. Requirements for this module are Yes, and this takes a lot of work to do right (says the guy that tried that back in the early days of CSS::Parser). But it would be a great win. I think we can start small (but clean) and try to build on top of that. For the forward compat rules, I don't think that should go into CSS::SAC. CSS SAC just parses the syntax, and doesn't care about the specific versions. Ignoring unknown rules ought to be taken care of by a SAC Filter I think. Eg CSS::SAC::Filter::CSS2 would only let through events that are correct CSS2 events and weed the rest out. Building it into CSS::SAC will imho be cumbersome at best. By the way, I'm not sure that CSS::Properties is a good name as we would also want to deal with @rules and selectors. The former are probably easier, the latter probably insanely hard :-) But properties is a good place start. > * it must distinguish between CSS levels (1, 2, 3) > * it must consider CSS modules > * it should be easily extensible for new CSS levels > * it should consider CSS profiles > * it should consider SVG 1.0 All of these can probably be resolved together. CSS::Properties::CSS1 would define what's good for CSS1. CSS::Properties::CSS2 would then import that, and define somehow what it *doesn't* want to import (eg deprecated stuff), and add its own. Saying what one doesn't want would be necessary for profiles, SVG, etc. This is probably a matter of agreeing on common data structures, and providing ways to filter and merge them. Not too hard. We could use hashes to merge stuff, and filters could simply weed out the keys they don't want (the most common case). > * it must provide explicite information on valid values The above hash could have a hashref as its value that would in turn contain a valid_values entry, the value of which would be an array of valid LexicalUnits. This scheme can probably (I haven't thought about it too deeply) work for simple (ie not shorthand) properties. If not I'm pretty sure something similar can be devised. > * it must enable applications to resolve shorthand properties Again, another key of that hash, say resolve_shorthand, would point to a sub that would know how to do that. All it needs to receive is the content of the property, and it could return a hash of simple-property/property-values. Again, if that's not sufficient, then something similar can be done imho. > We can make a deal, someone provides a template for the data and I will > fill that template with data from CSS 1.0, CSS 2.0, SVG 1.0 and > occasionally CSS Level 3. Wow, I admire your courage ! With sufficient reflexion on the above outlined schemes, I could provide you with the template. I unfortunately don't have the time to fill in the data. > The CSS property value notation is quite complex. Think of property > values as XML DTD content models, thus order, occurences, alternates, > etc. shall be considered. As much as possible I think we should keep things simple for simple properties (eg provide an array of valid values for those that take only alternates) and provide maximal flexibility for the more complex ones (ie use Perl code in coderefs). If there are intermediate cases that don't work with the former but are too simple (or too frequent) to warrant the latter then we can start using code-templating techniques. The problem is, it's hard to define this a priori. > This module, in combination with CSS::SAC would enable us to write some > CSS::Validator module. If I get any time, I'll write that module as > contribution to the W3C HTML Validator (http://validator.w3.org/). I'd be able to contribute to CSS::Validator as well. I just don't have time to go through the entire CSS/SVG specs one by one to patiently list all content model variations and find the best scheme to express them all in the simplest way. With some premunching of those however, I could most certainly help finding a Perl solution. -- _______________________________________________________________________ Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Doctor: "Ah, ah that's a catch question. With a brain your size you don't think, right?" -- Dr. Who |
|
From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2001-10-21 18:46:25
|
On Sunday 21 October 2001 20:30, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > CSS::SAC needs some addtitional test cases to fail some tests if the > required Text::Balanced version is not installed. I don't remember what > made the difference (probably multiline strings, Robin probably knows > better), therfore I cannot recommend some... The problem was with a faulty regex in Text::Balanced. Unless you have found a new bug, that bug was fixed in version 1.84. The way to check that the right version is installed is normally through Makefile.PL's PREREQ_PM hash. Right now that part is asking that the user have Text::Balanced 1.84 or better, and ought to warn if it's not there (the CPAN shell will fetch the dependency if it fails). If people are installing it in other ways, then the only way to impose a version is to have SAC.pm say "use Text::Balanced '1.84'". Feel free to patch that if you think people may not be using Makefile.PL correctly (which would be silly, but you never know. And perhaps PPM doesn't work with that ?) -- _______________________________________________________________________ Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Is life worth living? It all depends upon the liver. |
|
From: Robin B. <ro...@kn...> - 2001-10-21 18:42:28
|
On Sunday 21 October 2001 19:46, you wrote: > Never looked into SourceForge's homepage features. I like to install > a little CGI script that takes some style sheets and returns some > text/plain document (a Notation3 document, the script is supposed to be > an implementation of my meta data proposal for CSS Level 3). Would this > be possible in general, i.e. does Sourceforge allow us to run CGI > scripts? Are latest CSS::SAC, Text::Balanced, etc.pp. installed in this > web space? If not, what about some cron'd script that installs those > modules on a regular base? At least, can I get someone to install those > modules in a local module space? I don't trust my PREFIX=... > capabilities anymore :-) I haven't looked at SF's CGI features, nor in fact into anything that relates to how the homepage works. The latest versions are certainly not available by default, though installing with PREFIX could take care of that (c'mon Bjoern, you know how to pass an argument ;-). By default all project members have write-access to the web tree, and I think we ought to keep it this way. Web hosting is documented in the SF docs (chapter 5). You can setup cron jobs from your SSH. It also has information on how to automatically export data from the project to your local website. I guess it wouldn't be too hard to have a local module space in which we'd put the latest dependencies (once should be enough, and hey, you can even scp them there if you don't want to use PREFIX ;-) and have a cron job check stuff out of cvs into it. Note that another, perhaps simpler, solution would be to host the site somewhere else and have our SF homepage redirect there (one can also change the "Homepage" link of the project). I could host stuff on my server but as a rule we don't open shell or FTP accounts so I'd be the only one able to write there. If you send me a ready-to-run website I'll be happy to set up such a space (eg on http://perl-css.berjon.com/) but I don't have time right now to maintain a website on a very regular basis. Updates once a week would be fine though. So we have a variety of solutions. Pick your favourite and I'll help with what I can :-) -- _______________________________________________________________________ Robin Berjon <ro...@kn...> -- CTO k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Sex is not the answer. Sex is the question. "Yes" is the answer. |
41 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
