From: Ben C. <BCl...@pe...> - 2004-11-30 09:37:25
|
Flo, I think this is an excellent idea! Thanks. I will arrange a domain name for this, something like wiki.perfparse.org. Can you work with this? If I look through email I think the main idea was specifications. There is one on the sf.net project page for deletion policies: http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=23729&group_id=109355 Another I emailed around for new database, will upload directly to wiki when possible :) Yves wrote: > Specifications, when there are some. Yes (I'm thinking about the next database schema > for mysql, and API for modules that I will define soon). > But don't take them as the reference. The reference is always the code : > - create_mysql.sh for mysql database schema (Ben, do you have better idea than that file ?) > - storage.h for storage modules. No I don't have a better idea. The file is to create the schema when using MySQL. (I took the name from Nagios version of the same so that users with both projects would find this familiar.) Have you a better idea? > Answering the question at the beginning of this mail, I have 2 suggestions : > - have one wiki with entries for the main stuff (spec drafts, faq, ...) > - have one wiki per main stuff (one for spec drafts, one for faq, ...) I would like to see one clean page for each specification. Keeps things simple and readable... (Like RFCs. It works for them :) The FAQ is a public entity and should therefore have it's own page to replace the current FAQ. Current I hope will be start of new: http://perfparse.sourceforge.net/faq.php Garry has also given us a good clear style for this FAQ which works with this main site, so I think we should try and maintain this if possible :) Have I missed anything? Ben Flo Gleixner wrote: > > Had a relaying problem right now so the mail was rejected - have to > switch private mail to my own mailserver :-) > > So, i'm back now from basketball - how about a tiki tomorrow? > > Flo > > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Flo Gleixner wrote: > >> >> >> hey, just almost missed the wiki discussion :-) >> >> Since i'm a project admin of tikiwiki, i'd surely vote for tikiwiki. I >> also have a server with root access and 500GB traffic fast ethernet >> connection (100MBit), own dns server, mailserver, ... whatever one can >> do with a root account. I'd be pleased to host a perfparse site (or >> part of it). I can install can configure a tikiwiki in less than 10 >> mins :-) But at the momenet i have to go to play basketball. I'll be >> back in 3-4 hours... >> >> Flo >> >> >> On Mon, 29 Nov 2004, Yves wrote: >> >>> >>>> What structure would you like to see in a wiki/tiki system? >>>> >>>> For my self I would like to see editable specifications of new work we >>>> are going to undertake. Where comments as well as actual changes >>>> can be >>>> made. >>> >>> >>> Specifications, when there are some. Yes (I'm thinking about the next >>> database schema >>> for mysql, and API for modules that I will define soon). >>> But don't take them as the reference. The reference is always the code : >>> - create_mysql.sh for mysql database schema (Ben, do you have better >>> idea than that file ?) >>> - storage.h for storage modules. >>> >>> But I like the idea to have a public draft for specifications. >>> >>> >>>> Yves also mentioned a public FAQ, private edit. Now the software is >>>> gaining in ability, this sounds like an excellent idea. >>> >>> >>> have a look on that : http://www.squirrelmail.org/wiki/UserFAQ >>> >>> Answering the question at the beginning of this mail, I have 2 >>> suggestions : >>> - have one wiki with entries for the main stuff (spec drafts, faq, ...) >>> - have one wiki per main stuff (one for spec drafts, one for faq, ...) >>> >>> I suggest one wiki because we can link some FAQ entries inside our >>> drafts ? >>> >>> btw, if you don't know what wiki to use, have a look on the wiki that >>> squirrelmail uses, >>> and have a look on what wikipedia uses. I don't know which is the best. >>> >>>> Thanks to Tim and Yves for finding and fixing a bug so quickly. >>> >>> >>> Thanks to Tim : he noticed the problem, found the bug, well, yes, >>> that's me who found >>> the bug, and he found the solution while I was actively searching for >>> it :) >>> >>> Yves >>> >>> -- >>> - Homepage - http://ymettier.free.fr - http://www.logicacmg.com - >>> - GPG key - http://ymettier.free.fr/gpg.txt - >>> - Maitretarot - http://www.nongnu.org/maitretarot/ - >>> - Perfparse - http://perfparse.sf.net/ - >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide >>> Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. >>> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. >>> http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Perfparse-devel-int mailing list >>> Per...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfparse-devel-int >>> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Perfparse-devel-int mailing list > Per...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/perfparse-devel-int > |