Re: [perfmon2] [PATCH] perf_events: fix bug in AMD per-cpu initialization
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
seranian
From: Stephane E. <er...@go...> - 2010-03-23 22:41:53
|
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:18 PM, Peter Zijlstra <pe...@in...> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 16:12 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra <pe...@in...> wrote: >> > On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 15:55 +0100, Stephane Eranian wrote: >> >> What's the point of CPU_ONLINE vs. CPU_STARTING if you're saying the >> >> former is never right? Why not move CPU_ONLINE to the right place and >> >> drop CPU_STARTING? >> > >> > Its right for a lot of things, just not for perf, we need to be ready >> > and done by the time the cpu starts scheduling. >> > >> You mean they need to wait until after the cpu starts scheduling? >> As opposed to being called just before it starts scheduling. > > As in it doesn't really matter for them, and the CPU_ONLINE call is > convenient in that it allows the callback to schedule too. > Fine, I will try your proposed patch tomorrow. A priori, it looks fine. |