Re: [patch 00/13] [RFC] support for encrypted documents v1.3

[Michal H. <ms...@gm...>]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 05:58:19AM +0200, Martin Petricek wrote:
> > I would like to prevent any further legal discussions, so encrypted ->
> > unecrypted doesn't sound like a good solution.
> 
> Question is then, what operations with encrypted documents we plan to 
> support in future?
> Now we can only read the encrypted document in read-only mode and examine 
> what is in it (which is good, but of somewhat limited use).
> 
> >>> Other solution, which comes to mind is to add password dialog but add an
> >>> NotImplementedException to the Delinearizator::delinearize (proposed
> >>> patch is delinearize_ask_for_passwd.patch[*]). Nevertheless I have one
> >>> problem here too. GUI fails with SEGV when exception is thrown but I
> >>> cannot see why.
> >> If we won't support it now, at least throw exception/error message instead
> >> of crashing.
> >
> > Second patch _throws_ the NotImplementedException which leads in SEGV in
> > gui.
> 
> Probably uncaught exception, I'll have to fix that once the patch is in CVS.

OK, patch-set is in the CVS and this problem is reported as 263 assigned
to you. It has priority set to immediate because we need to provide this
fix ASAP.


-- 
Michal Hocko