[Pcgen-team-content] [JIRA] Updated: (DATA-403) Weapon, shield and armor Hardness and Hit Points

[JIRA (f. A. M. ) <ji...@pc...>]

     [ http://jira.pcgen.org/browse/DATA-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Andrew Maitland updated DATA-403:
---------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: Needs Code Support
                       (was: Unscheduled)

> Weapon, shield and armor Hardness and Hit Points
> ------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DATA-403
>                 URL: http://jira.pcgen.org/browse/DATA-403
>             Project: Data
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Pathfinder, RSRD (3.5E), SRD (3.0E)
>            Reporter: David R. Bender
>             Fix For: Needs Code Support
>
>
> SF ID: 1548650
> Last Update: Settings changed ( eddyanthony )
> Details:
> -- In pcg...@ya..., "David"wrote:
> >
> > Currently, Hardness and Hit Points are not part of
> PCGen.
> >
> http://www.d20srd.org/srd/exploration.htm#tableCommonAr
> morWeaponAndShieldHardnessAndHitPoints
> >
> > I would like to see this implemented. I think it
> might be put in as
> > part of the eqmod, but that is for wiser data
> monkeys than I to decide.
> >
> > -- david
> I think that is another good candidate for
> implementation once we have Equipment variables. A
> workaround using normal variables as with the modern
> vehicle wouldn't work here, since you can equip more
> than 1 weapon.
> In the meantime you can enter a Data FREQ for this,
> Priority 3 as the Spec for Equipment variables isn't
> fully hashed out yet.
> Cheerio,
> Frank Kliewe
> PCGen Content Silverback
> Submitted:
> David R. Bender ( papa_drb ) - 2006-08-29 11:18:10 EDT 
> Date: 2008-05-20 08:48:40 EDT
> Sender: kariannaSourceForge.net DonorProject Admin & DonorAccepting Donations
> Hide
> What actually needs to be done here? A Spec on experimental?
> Date: 2006-09-22 18:19:30 EDT
> Sender: tir-gwaithSourceForge.net Subscriber and DonorProject DonorAccepting Donations
> Hide
> Logged In: YES
> user_id=208239
> I personally think this is such a major aspect of _common_
> items, that I'd like to see EQUIPHARDNESS and EQUIPHP tags,
> and OS tokens. Appropriate tags in Equipmod objects.
> This is going to be a common aspect of normal items. Having
> more than one tag needed per item to define these seems
> using too powerful a tool to do a simple job. One of those,
> why use a socket wrench when all you need is a screwdriver?
> The opposite side of this argument is, why aren't we
> planning on turning REACH, WT, CRITRANGE, etc. into local
> defines?
> I know I posted this to pcgen_experimental awhile back.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.pcgen.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira