[Pcgen-team-content] [JIRA] Commented: (DATA-225) Definition of Glaive Weapon Proficiency Missing "Reach" Type?

[JIRA (f. A. M. ) <ji...@pc...>]

    [ http://jira.pcgen.org/browse/DATA-225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12001#action_12001 ] 

Andrew Maitland commented on DATA-225:
--------------------------------------

He does appear to be correct. Simply missing Reach from one file. It's a matter of semantics really. The only thing those effect are "BONUS:WEAPONPROF=TYPE.Reach|x|y".

The same thing happened to Halberd.

> Definition of Glaive Weapon Proficiency Missing "Reach" Type?
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DATA-225
>                 URL: http://jira.pcgen.org/browse/DATA-225
>             Project: Data
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Pathfinder
>    Affects Versions: 5.16.4
>            Reporter: Allen Cohn
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> Not sure, but I *think* the Weapon Proficiency for Glaive should include the "Reach" type.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.pcgen.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira