[Pcgen-trackers_Data] [ pcgen-Data Feature Requests-1483912 ] Bring SRD and RSRD closer together

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Data Feature Requests item #1483912, was opened at 2006-05-08 08:46
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by amaitland
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750092&aid=1483912&group_id=25576

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Expand Existing Feature
Group: For 6.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 6
Private: No
Submitted By: Paul W. King (kingpaul)
>Assigned to: LegacyKing (amaitland)
Summary: Bring SRD and RSRD closer together

Initial Comment:
Per http://games.groups.yahoo.com/group/pcgen/message/90465

> > p.s.
> > I keep asking myself why the structure of data of
> > SRD is different from RSRD. Someone has a clue?
> Because they were done years apart.

And no one has thought to maintain srd and rsrd as
close (similar) as possible? (Since many parts of RSRD
can be viewed as modification of SRD)

===

Paul W. King
PR SB, BoD

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe)
Date: 2007-02-07 18:27

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1241568
Originator: NO

There are a couple of monster classes that use a comma in the name. I have
left them out in the SRD cleanup I recently did, because it should be part
of this tracker to review and generalize the monster class names for SRD
and RSRD.

-- Frank

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna)
Date: 2006-09-08 01:32

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=252169

moved - K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith)
Date: 2006-09-07 17:33

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=208239

Ye gads.  I've tried to maintain this, but some parts are 
going to _have_ to be done differently.  As we do Ability 
object project, this would be a good thing to do.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe)
Date: 2006-09-07 17:21

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1241568

Kar: This is too big a task to be in one of the next
releases. Please push it back on the roadmap.

Setting Priority to 6 to match that -- Frank

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750092&aid=1483912&group_id=25576