From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-05-28 09:04:36
|
Data Feature Requests item #1726705, was opened at 2007-05-28 05:47 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by karianna You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750092&aid=1726705&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: None >Group: For 6.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: LegacyKing (amaitland) Assigned to: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Summary: [Tir] Post 5.12 - Testing Initial Comment: > Fourth, we have Templates. TEMPLATE:CHOOSE creates a bit of an > > interesting/special situation because ADDCHOICE can add to that global > > template list. Thus, this is similar in form to the Second example > > (Languages, et al.) > > > > Lastly, Spells. These get nasty. We have Lists for Available, Known, > > and Memorized, so there are *at least* four states (counting not > > possessed by the PC). The problem is that all three of the possessed > > states (Available, Known, and Memorized) may or may not interact with > > the PRExxx tokens (I would love someone to build - and test - the > > matrix of when each of the PRESPELLxxx: tokens can be passed based on > > where spells are on PCs with and without MEMORIZE: and SPELLBOOK:) Ok, that sounds like something for me, post 5.12. Someone poke me on it. I can build a matrix as to what _should_ happen, but I'm not sure if I'll have to time to test it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750092&aid=1726705&group_id=25576 |