From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-05-19 12:05:07
|
Data Feature Requests item #1246760, was opened at 2005-07-28 08:04 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tir-gwaith You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750092&aid=1246760&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Implement New Feature Group: For 5.12 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 7 Private: No Submitted By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) >Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: [Malhavoc] If Thoughts Could Kill, review and move to d20ogl Initial Comment: If Thoughts Could Kill, review and move to d20ogl ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2007-05-19 07:05 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Originator: NO I'm backing out of this for 5.12. Too much to do before then. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-09-04 19:02 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Raising Priority to match the roadmap -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-24 03:09 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Hi Frank, ah, OK that makes sense, I just got confused with the way the 3 trackers (New, Freqs and Development) are supposed to work, all sorted now :-) - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-23 13:06 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 @Kar - I'm not sure what you mean. If you say that this sort of task doesn't belong into data freqs, I wouldn't know where else it should go. The task behind this is taking a review on a data set in Alpha stage to see whether it is fit to be included as a regular set, and perhaps do some lst work to bring it there or push for necessary code work. Since it is not a new source it doesn't belong there, and since it can involve more than just correcting errors it doesn't fit into Data Bugs either. OTOH maybe you are confused by the (closed) New Source tracker for a 3.5 conversion of this set. That's not what this tracker is for. This one asks for the review of the original set, which is still in Alpha. @Tir - as this was assigned to you before, I'm throwing it back in your direction. Let me know if you won't find the time in the near future. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 11:19 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Frank, should be in another tracker? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750092&aid=1246760&group_id=25576 |