Menu
▾
▴
[Pcgen-trackers_Data] [ pcgen-Data Bugs-1238570 ] [RSRD] Shield prof penalty
|
From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2007-05-02 23:04:26
|
Data Bugs item #1238570, was opened at 2005-07-15 02:31 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by frank_kliewe You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1238570&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Equipment List File Missing Data >Group: For 6.0 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 3 Private: No Submitted By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Assigned to: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Summary: [RSRD] Shield prof penalty Initial Comment: According to the 3.5 SRD, "When you are using a shield with which you are not proficient, you take the shield's armor check penalty on attack rolls and on all skill checks that involve moving, including Ride checks." The attack penalty part of this seems to be encoded in rsrd_equip_armorshields.lst when it shows this on the Tower shield line: BONUS:WEAPON|TOHIT|SHIELDACCHECK|!PREFEAT:1,Tower Shield Proficiency Should the lines for every other shield have a similar BONUS: tag? So that the Light wooden shield says: BONUS:WEAPON|TOHIT|SHIELDACCHECK|!PREFEAT:1,Shield Proficiency Submitted by: Randy Shipp <ran...@gm...> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-08-30 00:48 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 Setting Priority to 3 as this still needs to be spec'ed out. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-08-23 10:31 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Needs experimental and then shifted to code freqs - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony) Date: 2006-03-22 18:57 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=886893 I agree, something in the gameMode perhaps. We might be able to add a bonus to the stats and checks file but it is more likely we will need to spec a code FREQ. We should look at Armor prof penalties and how they are handled as well. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-03-22 18:22 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 That would mean putting that on every shield... This is a general rule. I'd rather put it _once_ and be done. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-03-22 18:03 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Reed no longer active - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2005-07-27 09:50 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Reed, can someone check to see if this is needed? ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=750091&aid=1238570&group_id=25576 |