[Pcgen-trackers_Docs] [ pcgen-Documentation Feature Requests-1411296 ] PCG format and parsing order

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Documentation Feature Requests item #1411296, was opened at 2006-01-20 21:21
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by maredudd800
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=748235&aid=1411296&group_id=25576

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: Documentation New Page/Section
Group: For 5.16.0
>Status: Pending
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Eddy Anthony (eddyanthony)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: PCG format and parsing order

Initial Comment:
Per 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/pcgen/message/82530

Hi there,

I'd like to put in a request for the PCG file format and 
the parsing to be documented. It's readable but there's 
no clue what sorting or order-of-operations priorities it 
has.

James McP

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Maredudd (maredudd800)
Date: 2008-08-19 02:37

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1569765
Originator: NO

Considering that the PCG is not a file we really want the users to mess
with, is this tracker still necessary?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Maredudd (maredudd800)
Date: 2008-08-08 10:49

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1569765
Originator: NO

Will the move to 6.0 change the pcg file?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Maredudd (maredudd800)
Date: 2007-07-17 12:41

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1569765
Originator: NO

As we are moving toward 6.0 and CDOM, I think this one needs to be moved
out . . .



----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna)
Date: 2006-04-06 10:14

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=252169

I'd see it the same as documented LST tokens, it's input
tokens read in by the system, although I realise that it
shouldn't be altered.  I think it would help with regards to
debugging issues.  Not a high priority though - K

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Aaron Divinsky (boomer70)
Date: 2006-04-06 09:35

Message:
Logged In: YES 
user_id=1249558

What is the point of documenting this?  We don't support 
user editing of a PCG file so why do people need to know 
anything about what is in there?

-Aaron

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=748235&aid=1411296&group_id=25576