From: SourceForge.net <no...@so...> - 2008-07-19 02:41:54
|
Feature Requests item #1554422, was opened at 2006-09-08 09:25 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by jdempsey You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=1554422&group_id=25576 Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread, including the initial issue submission, for this request, not just the latest update. Category: Tag modification >Group: Unscheduled Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Private: No Submitted By: DanielH (dhorne1ca) Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody) Summary: New feature for CLASS tag in biosetting.lst Initial Comment: I was wondering if it is possible to change or include the ability to use types in the CLASS tag that is used in the biosetting lst file. I was thinking that the ability to add types will reduce the need to .MOD the biosettings when adding new classes. The form I was hoping to use is: CLASS:TYPE.Type1[BASEAGEADD:2d6]... Where the Classes Tpyes included Type1, Type2, or Type3 in the TYPE Tag to match up with the base age bonus. ie. CLASS:Barbarian<TAB>TYPE:Base.PC.TYPE1<TAB>... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Martijn Verburg (karianna) Date: 2006-09-08 18:42 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=252169 Currently assigned to 5.11.2 roadmap - K ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Frank Kliewe (frank_kliewe) Date: 2006-09-08 11:28 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=1241568 I tend to agree here, we have enough discussions that need to be done. I'll post an info on Experimental though, in case anybody else should have a beef with it. Kar: Consider this approved from Data and put it on the roadmap accordingly. -- Frank ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-09-08 10:11 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 Bad me. Meant to assign to Frank for comment. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment By: Andrew McDougall (tir-gwaith) Date: 2006-09-08 10:07 Message: Logged In: YES user_id=208239 This seems very straight-forward expansion, using syntax structures we've used before. I'd say this can be done without a whole major discussion.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=384722&aid=1554422&group_id=25576 |