"typed answer" designation
Brought to you by:
axel77,
ronnystandtke
Menu
▾
▴
#50 "typed answer" designation
Hi,
This idea is similar to the "middle side" feature
request below (a very nice feature request, in my
opinion). but since that middle side request has been
around for more than a year, and there is still no
middle side, i think i am justified in proposing an
alternative solution.
Basically, sometimes you want to include extra
information on the card back side, but that would
preclude your ability to remember "by typing" because
it would be way too long. Thus, it would be great if it
was possible to designate the first word (or some small
number of words) as the "typed answer" which is what
you would have to type to remember the card correctly,
and leave the other information on the card as memory
aide / info but without having to type it when remembering.
This would achieve one of the results desired by the
"multiple side" people, without having to actually
implement multiple sides.
Anybody that has comments/changes/suggestions about
this idea is surely welcome to respond. :)
Thank you again for the cool software.
Logged In: YES
user_id=1529597
This is, I think, more difficult to implement like this
middle-site (is my opinion).
But I have a idea how to implement it:
the programmers can declare something like a list of
information (1., 2., ... or with '-'). Example:
- first
- second ...
or
1. first
2. second ...
And each list-element has something lik a headline. So the
headline is what you have to type in, the extra information
is what you have to "remember".
Example
----------
1. side of the card (question):
which are the three basic human blood corpuscles
2. back side:
- white
white blood corpuscle: what they do in the body ...
explanation ... etc.
- red
red blood corpuscle: ...
...
a.s.o.
It´s difficult to implement I think, because you have to
write a syntax for it.
But maybe it´s easier to use XML. So you can put it like this.
<head elements ...
<list name="white">information ... what the corpuscle do
... </list>
<list name="red">...</list>
</head>
or
first side:
<head>
<synonym>Wolke</synonym>
<synonym>Wolken</synonym>
<head>
back side:
<head>
<synonym>cloud</synonym>
<synonym>clouds</synonym>
...
This would also be an idea how to impelement my explanation
for a syntax in the feature request: 844307
"Wiederholen durch Eingeben"