FYI, the .96BETA-3 RPM you sent me previously did not require this newest ABI version, but the newly published RPM on sourceforge does require it. F22 has GCC 5.1, but I cannot upgrade yet as AMD Catalyst doesn't work yet on F22, which released less than a month ago.
Is this ABI really required?
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hi Rony,
FYI, the .96BETA-3 RPM you sent me previously did not require this newest ABI version, but the newly published RPM on sourceforge does require it. F22 has GCC 5.1, but I cannot upgrade yet as AMD Catalyst doesn't work yet on F22, which released less than a month ago.
Is this ABI really required?
On Fri, 19 Jun 2015 04:28:53 +0000
"Porcelain Mouse" porcelainmouse@users.sf.net wrote:
Not really, since the src.rpm builds without problems on F21.
I've uploaded the build result for your convenience.
http://www.squirrel.nl/pub/xfer/uploads/3CuG9KBEiZZGW440zoxo6hwA.96BETA-3.x86_64.rpm
-- Johan
That's the difference between bleeding and leading edge...
I've made a build for Fedora 21 64 bit architecture that you can try from
http://pwsafe.org/tmp/F21/pwsafe-0.96BETA-3.x86_64.F21.rpm
and the corresponding GPG signature file
http://pwsafe.org/tmp/F21/pwsafe-0.96BETA-3.x86_64.F21.rpm.sig
Let me know if this works for you.
Thanks Rony. Yes, the F21 rpm installed fine.
Sorry, I keep making you do extra work. I can totally use the src.rpm; I just didn't notice them. Thanks to Johan for the pointer.
I'm still confused as to how to get it to use my pre-configured yubikey challenge-auth slot, like it does in Windows, but that's not a change.