pasdoc-main

[Pasdoc-main] [ pasdoc-Bugs-2886653 ] private const

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #2886653, was opened at 2009-10-26 19:05
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by drdiettrich
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104213&aid=2886653&group_id=4213

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: parser (Delphi 200x features)
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Grzegorz Skoczylas (gskoczylas)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: private const

Initial Comment:
PasDoc is unable to parse constant defined in *strict private* section of class. I have tested both the PasDoc 0.11 and the PasDoc2 (checkout from the https://pasdoc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pasdoc/branches/PasDoc2).

Error is incorrectly detected in the line #56 of the attached file. This code is compiling without any hints or warnings (or errors) with Delphi 2007.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Comment By: Dr. Diettrich (drdiettrich)
Date: 2009-10-26 22:41

Message:
Right, PasDoc cannot handle private constants nor types.

Can you provide a grammar for the current OPL?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104213&aid=2886653&group_id=4213

[Pasdoc-main] [ pasdoc-Bugs-2886653 ] private const

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #2886653, was opened at 2009-10-26 20:05
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by gskoczylas
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104213&aid=2886653&group_id=4213

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: parser (Delphi 200x features)
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Grzegorz Skoczylas (gskoczylas)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: private const

Initial Comment:
PasDoc is unable to parse constant defined in *strict private* section of class. I have tested both the PasDoc 0.11 and the PasDoc2 (checkout from the https://pasdoc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pasdoc/branches/PasDoc2).

Error is incorrectly detected in the line #56 of the attached file. This code is compiling without any hints or warnings (or errors) with Delphi 2007.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104213&aid=2886653&group_id=4213

[Pasdoc-main] [ pasdoc-Feature Requests-2859413 ] Parse Comments in Implementation Section

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Feature Requests item #2859413, was opened at 2009-09-15 19:17
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by kambi
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=354213&aid=2859413&group_id=4213

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Larry Hengen (larryhengen)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Parse Comments in Implementation Section

Initial Comment:
PasDoc seems to work well, and I have adjusted my JavaDoc comments in hcOPF in order to use it, until I discovered that it does not extract comments from the implementation section.   This makes it unusable as far as I am concerned.  I have rather large comment blocks at the start of each method, and I want them to stay within the method commented so I can move the code without losing the comment attached to it.  It also makes more sense to have the comments as close to the actual code as possible so developers can understand the code easier by reading the comments that appear on the screen at the same time, and more importantly update the comments to ensure they are kept current.

Is this feature likely to be released any time soon, or should I search for  an alternative?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Michalis Kamburelis (kambi)
Date: 2009-09-15 23:16

Message:
This feature was requested many times, but so far noone who is interested
in it provided necessary patches. See
http://pasdoc.sipsolutions.net/WantedFeaturesParsingImplementation, and the
mailing list, like the last thread "[Pasdoc-main] Comments for methods".
So, contributions are welcome!

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=354213&aid=2859413&group_id=4213

[Pasdoc-main] [ pasdoc-Feature Requests-2859413 ] Parse Comments in Implementation Section

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Feature Requests item #2859413, was opened at 2009-09-15 11:17
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by larryhengen
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=354213&aid=2859413&group_id=4213

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Larry Hengen (larryhengen)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Parse Comments in Implementation Section

Initial Comment:
PasDoc seems to work well, and I have adjusted my JavaDoc comments in hcOPF in order to use it, until I discovered that it does not extract comments from the implementation section.   This makes it unusable as far as I am concerned.  I have rather large comment blocks at the start of each method, and I want them to stay within the method commented so I can move the code without losing the comment attached to it.  It also makes more sense to have the comments as close to the actual code as possible so developers can understand the code easier by reading the comments that appear on the screen at the same time, and more importantly update the comments to ensure they are kept current.

Is this feature likely to be released any time soon, or should I search for  an alternative?

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=354213&aid=2859413&group_id=4213

Re: [Pasdoc-main] Comments for methods

[Hans-Peter D. <DrD...@ao...>]

Rory Slegtenhorst schrieb:

> I have defined my method comments in the implementation section.
> PasDoc does not seem to recognize any of them comments.

Right. The parser only can handle the interface section.

> if I place the comments in the interface section, it seems to work but 
> this clutters my class definition.

Right :-(

The PasDoc2 GUI allows to add descriptions to external files.


> Any idea's are very welcome.

FpDoc uses the FPC parser, which is kept up-to-date by the FPC people. 
I'd prefer to use that parser even in PasDoc, so that also the 
implementation section can be parsed, but couldn't make it work yet :-(

DoDi

Re: [Pasdoc-main] Comments for methods

[Michalis K. <mic...@gm...>]

2009/9/11 Rory Slegtenhorst:
> Dear list,
> I am not sure wether this has been asked before. I had a lot of trouble
> trying to search the mailing list using google...
> I have defined my method comments in the implementation section.
> PasDoc does not seem to recognize any of them comments.
> if I place the comments in the interface section, it seems to work but this
> clutters my class definition.
> Any idea's are very welcome.

Currently only interface comments are extracted. Parsing
implementation and handling comments there was asked for many times,
but so far it's not implemented. If you want to help, read
http://pasdoc.sipsolutions.net/WantedFeaturesParsingImplementation and
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=20051214225752.GA17622%40localhost&forum_name=pasdoc-main

Michalis

[Pasdoc-main] Comments for methods

[Rory S. <ror...@gm...>]

Dear list,
I am not sure wether this has been asked before. I had a lot of trouble
trying to search the mailing list using google...

I have defined my method comments in the implementation section.
PasDoc does not seem to recognize any of them comments.
if I place the comments in the interface section, it seems to work but this
clutters my class definition.

Any idea's are very welcome.

Rory Slegtenhorst
rory dot slegtenhorst at gmail dot com

Re: [Pasdoc-main] Problem with PasDoc GUI

[Michalis K. <mic...@gm...>]

David Keith wrote:
> 
> I downloaded everything from here:
> 
> https://pasdoc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pasdoc/trunk
> 
> Is there something else that I should have checked out?

Nope, that's Ok.

You still forgot about the rest of the questions --- if you want the
problem with "library" investigated, please submit an example file(s)
that demonstrate it.

> 
> Can you please provide the svn url?

https://pasdoc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pasdoc/branches/PasDoc2/

Michalis

Re: [Pasdoc-main] Problem with PasDoc GUI

[Hans-Peter D. <DrD...@ao...>]

David Keith schrieb:

>     Can I assume that the units that are used from pasdoc in the
> pasdocgui can be substituted for the units in pasdoc2? In other words,
> can the pasdocgui use the same units in pasdoc2?

I'm not sure, never tried so. The added features of the new pasdoc2_gui 
required some changes in the components. I don't know when I find time 
to look at the Lazarus GUI.

DoDi

Re: [Pasdoc-main] Problem with PasDoc GUI

[David K. <DK...@we...>]

DoDi -

	Can I assume that the units that are used from pasdoc in the
pasdocgui can be substituted for the units in pasdoc2? In other words,
can the pasdocgui use the same units in pasdoc2?

Thanks.

David Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: Hans-Peter Diettrich [mailto:DrD...@ao...] 
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 2:51 PM
To: Discussion, announcements,questions concerning pasdoc
Subject: Re: [Pasdoc-main] Problem with PasDoc GUI

David Keith schrieb:

> On a separate note, we are considering pasdoc as the tool that we use
to 
> document our voluminous Delphi source, but are looking for some 
> additional features. We would consider paying someone who is well
versed 
> with pasdoc/pasdoc_gui source to add some features if the price is
right.

Have a look at the PasDoc2 branch in the SVN. The GUI was developed for 
Delphi[7], because at that time I was not familiar with Lazarus. It 
already includes an editor for for external descriptions (not touching 
the source code), and has an improved parser.

Give it a try, and tell me what special features you are still missing.

DoDi


------------------------------------------------------------------------
------
Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge  
This is your chance to win up to $100,000 in prizes! For a limited time,

vendors submitting new applications to BlackBerry App World(TM) will
have
the opportunity to enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge. See full
prize  
details at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/Challenge
_______________________________________________
Pasdoc-main mailing list
Pas...@li...
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pasdoc-main

Re: [Pasdoc-main] Problem with PasDoc GUI

[David K. <DK...@we...>]

Michalis -

	See my replies below.

-----Original Message-----
From: Michalis Kamburelis [mailto:mic...@gm...] 
Sent: Friday, July 10, 2009 8:39 PM
To: Discussion, announcements,questions concerning pasdoc
Subject: Re: [Pasdoc-main] Problem with PasDoc GUI


What version of PasDoc source code do you get? SVN (trunk? or from some
tag / branch) or the zip from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pasdoc/files/ from "PasDoc Sources"?

>>
I downloaded everything from here:

https://pasdoc.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/pasdoc/trunk

Is there something else that I should have checked out?
<<

In any case,
1. you should check if command-line pasdoc makes the same error,
2. submit the exact source code on which pasdoc (GUI or command-line)
fails, then we can say more about the problem...

And yeah, like DoDi suggests try also the PasDoc2 branch --- it's not
merged yet, but there are some fixes for newer Delphi's syntax.
(Although "library" should work everywhere, both in trunk and PasDoc2.)


>>
Can you please provide the svn url?

Thanks.
<<


I'm interested in keeping pasdoc alive (I use it in my own projects),
but admittedly don't have time to work on it now much (neither free or
paid). But this is open-source: just submit bugs / feature requests,
maybe they will be just easy or, if feature request is sensible, maybe
someone interested will just pick it up. And maybe even see if you can
do it yourself (that's the point of giving you the source code after all
:) ).

Michalis

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>

Thanks for the reply.

David Keith

<<

Re: [Pasdoc-main] Problem with PasDoc GUI

[Michalis K. <mic...@gm...>]

David Keith wrote:
> I’m a new user of PasDoc, and have used the PasDoc GUI to generate help
> for a large Delphi 2009 project. I really like the way this works. I
> have downloaded the source for the GUI & for PasDoc, and am looking at
> the code to try to figure out why some units that were specified in the
> PasDoc GUI are ‘missed’ during the generation process. I’ve also
> reviewed the ‘plugins’ to find out how hard it would be to add features
> to the HTML or HTMLHelp output, and to determine how hard it would be to
> add database storage/retrieval to this system.
> 
>  
> 
> I’ve installed Lazarus/FPC 2.2.4, and have been working at debugging the
> code. Whenever I try to generate documentation using the .pds file that
> I created from the downloaded .exe for PasDoc_GUI, I get the following
> errors:
> 
>  
> 
> Project pasdoc_gui raised exception class ‘EPasDoc’ with message:
> 
> <source path>\<filename><.inc,.pas,.pp etc.>(</n>/): reserved word
> “library” expected but reserved word “Function” found.
> 

What version of PasDoc source code do you get? SVN (trunk? or from some
tag / branch) or the zip from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pasdoc/files/ from "PasDoc Sources"?

In any case,
1. you should check if command-line pasdoc makes the same error,
2. submit the exact source code on which pasdoc (GUI or command-line)
fails, then we can say more about the problem...

And yeah, like DoDi suggests try also the PasDoc2 branch --- it's not
merged yet, but there are some fixes for newer Delphi's syntax.
(Although "library" should work everywhere, both in trunk and PasDoc2.)

>  
> 
> On a separate note, we are considering pasdoc as the tool that we use to
> document our voluminous Delphi source, but are looking for some
> additional features. We would consider paying someone who is well versed
> with pasdoc/pasdoc_gui source to add some features if the price is right.
> 

I'm interested in keeping pasdoc alive (I use it in my own projects),
but admittedly don't have time to work on it now much (neither free or
paid). But this is open-source: just submit bugs / feature requests,
maybe they will be just easy or, if feature request is sensible, maybe
someone interested will just pick it up. And maybe even see if you can
do it yourself (that's the point of giving you the source code after all
:) ).

Michalis

Re: [Pasdoc-main] Problem with PasDoc GUI

[Hans-Peter D. <DrD...@ao...>]

David Keith schrieb:

> On a separate note, we are considering pasdoc as the tool that we use to 
> document our voluminous Delphi source, but are looking for some 
> additional features. We would consider paying someone who is well versed 
> with pasdoc/pasdoc_gui source to add some features if the price is right.

Have a look at the PasDoc2 branch in the SVN. The GUI was developed for 
Delphi[7], because at that time I was not familiar with Lazarus. It 
already includes an editor for for external descriptions (not touching 
the source code), and has an improved parser.

Give it a try, and tell me what special features you are still missing.

DoDi

[Pasdoc-main] Problem with PasDoc GUI

[David K. <DK...@we...>]

I'm a new user of PasDoc, and have used the PasDoc GUI to generate help
for a large Delphi 2009 project. I really like the way this works. I
have downloaded the source for the GUI & for PasDoc, and am looking at
the code to try to figure out why some units that were specified in the
PasDoc GUI are 'missed' during the generation process. I've also
reviewed the 'plugins' to find out how hard it would be to add features
to the HTML or HTMLHelp output, and to determine how hard it would be to
add database storage/retrieval to this system.

 

I've installed Lazarus/FPC 2.2.4, and have been working at debugging the
code. Whenever I try to generate documentation using the .pds file that
I created from the downloaded .exe for PasDoc_GUI, I get the following
errors:

 

Project pasdoc_gui raised exception class 'EPasDoc' with message:

<source path>\<filename><.inc,.pas,.pp etc.>(<n>): reserved word
"library" expected but reserved word "Function" found.

 

I've never seen these errors when working with the downloaded
pasdoc_gui.exe, only see them when I run the source in the Lazarus
debugger. Does anyone know why this might be occurring?

 

On a separate note, we are considering pasdoc as the tool that we use to
document our voluminous Delphi source, but are looking for some
additional features. We would consider paying someone who is well versed
with pasdoc/pasdoc_gui source to add some features if the price is
right.

 

Thanks.

 

David Keith

 

[Pasdoc-main] [ pasdoc-Bugs-2783037 ] Error with Class Operators

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Bugs item #2783037, was opened at 2009-04-28 19:45
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by anti-dau
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104213&aid=2783037&group_id=4213

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: parser (Delphi 200x features)
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Jakob Wenzel (anti-dau)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Error with Class Operators

Initial Comment:
When parsing a record with class operators like this, an error is generated and the whole file is not included:
class operator Add(p1,p2:TMyPoint):TMyPoint;
The error message is as follows:
Error EPasDoc: F:\Delphi\jdvd\trunc\common\uPersons.pas(14): One of symbols "," or ":" expected while parsing unit uPersons.pas, continuing...

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=104213&aid=2783037&group_id=4213

[Pasdoc-main] [ pasdoc-Patches-2750183 ] Czech translation

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Patches item #2750183, was opened at 2009-04-10 13:00
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kambi
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304213&aid=2750183&group_id=4213

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Accepted
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Michalis Kamburelis (kambi)
Summary: Czech translation

Initial Comment:
Hello,
I made simple translation to czech language in both used codepages (windows vs. iso).
My patch consist of two inc files (czech_cp1250 and czech_iso8859) and some necessary changes in PasDoc_Languages.pas.
Resources are based on English texts from version 0.11.0.
Rene

----------------------------------------------------------------------

>Comment By: Michalis Kamburelis (kambi)
Date: 2009-04-10 22:39

Message:
I adjusted them to the new translations format (we have changed internal
structures of PasDoc_Languages.pas, see source code in the Subversion
trunk), changed ISO8859_2 to ISO_8859_2 and applied.

Thank you!

(If you can, please checkout the SVN trunk and see if it's all Ok --- I
had to modify included files, hopefully I didn't mess up character codes.)

(Applied to both pasdoc trunk/ and branches/PasDoc2/.)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304213&aid=2750183&group_id=4213

[Pasdoc-main] [ pasdoc-Patches-2750183 ] Czech translation

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Patches item #2750183, was opened at 2009-04-10 13:00
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by kambi
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304213&aid=2750183&group_id=4213

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
>Assigned to: Michalis Kamburelis (kambi)
Summary: Czech translation

Initial Comment:
Hello,
I made simple translation to czech language in both used codepages (windows vs. iso).
My patch consist of two inc files (czech_cp1250 and czech_iso8859) and some necessary changes in PasDoc_Languages.pas.
Resources are based on English texts from version 0.11.0.
Rene

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304213&aid=2750183&group_id=4213

[Pasdoc-main] [ pasdoc-Patches-2750183 ] Czech translation

[SourceForge.net <no...@so...>]

Patches item #2750183, was opened at 2009-04-10 11:00
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by nobody
You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304213&aid=2750183&group_id=4213

Please note that this message will contain a full copy of the comment thread,
including the initial issue submission, for this request,
not just the latest update.
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Private: No
Submitted By: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (nobody)
Summary: Czech translation

Initial Comment:
Hello,
I made simple translation to czech language in both used codepages (windows vs. iso).
My patch consist of two inc files (czech_cp1250 and czech_iso8859) and some necessary changes in PasDoc_Languages.pas.
Resources are based on English texts from version 0.11.0.
Rene

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=304213&aid=2750183&group_id=4213

Re: [Pasdoc-main] simplexml

[Eric L. <eri...@gm...>]

Okay,
Thanks for your help.

Yesterday I looked at the source code in /trunk. I'll see if this pasdoc2
branch had some things I need.


Eric

On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Hans-Peter Diettrich <DrD...@ao...
> wrote:

> Eric Lemes schrieb:
>
> > I recently found this great project for documenting Delphi units. Thank
> > you for the great work.
>
> Thanks :-)
>
> > I'm currently needing the implementation of simplexml file. I downloaded
> > the lastest version from sourceforge and noticed that some comments
> > aren't generated in the xml files (like the comments in published
> > properties). Is there plans to make this work?
>
> Have a look at the PasDoc2 branch in the SVN repository. There I've
> implemented some new functionality, that may do what you want.
>
> > Is there any way to contribute to the project with some patches?
>
> I'm currently working on Lazarus, but if you want to contribute to
> PasDoc2, I'm willing to add your patches.
>
> DoDi
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Apps built with the Adobe(R) Flex(R) framework and Flex Builder(TM) are
> powering Web 2.0 with engaging, cross-platform capabilities. Quickly and
> easily build your RIAs with Flex Builder, the Eclipse(TM)based development
> software that enables intelligent coding and step-through debugging.
> Download the free 60 day trial. http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-adobe-com
> _______________________________________________
> Pasdoc-main mailing list
> Pas...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pasdoc-main
>

Re: [Pasdoc-main] simplexml

[Hans-Peter D. <DrD...@ao...>]

Michalis Kamburelis schrieb:

> You can also checkout the PasDoc2 version (also in SVN in branches)
> and see if it works better --- the plan is to apply PasDoc2 changes to
> trunk after some fixes.

Let me know if you need assistance. IMO it would be easier to apply the 
trunk changes to PasDoc2, and then make this the new trunk.

DoDi

Re: [Pasdoc-main] simplexml

[Hans-Peter D. <DrD...@ao...>]

Eric Lemes schrieb:

> I recently found this great project for documenting Delphi units. Thank 
> you for the great work.

Thanks :-)

> I'm currently needing the implementation of simplexml file. I downloaded 
> the lastest version from sourceforge and noticed that some comments 
> aren't generated in the xml files (like the comments in published 
> properties). Is there plans to make this work?

Have a look at the PasDoc2 branch in the SVN repository. There I've 
implemented some new functionality, that may do what you want.

> Is there any way to contribute to the project with some patches?

I'm currently working on Lazarus, but if you want to contribute to 
PasDoc2, I'm willing to add your patches.

DoDi

Re: [Pasdoc-main] simplexml

[Michalis K. <mic...@gm...>]

2009/3/10 Eric Lemes <eri...@gm...>:
> I downloaded the
> lastest version from sourceforge and noticed that some comments aren't
> generated in the xml files (like the comments in published properties). Is
> there plans to make this work?

Check out the SVN version (trunk) and see if it works better for you.

You can also checkout the PasDoc2 version (also in SVN in branches)
and see if it works better --- the plan is to apply PasDoc2 changes to
trunk after some fixes.

> Is there any way to contribute to the project with some patches?
>

Sure, you're most welcome. Send svn patches (against trunk or
branches/PasDoc2) to this mailing list, I'll apply.

Michalis

[Pasdoc-main] simplexml

[Eric L. <eri...@gm...>]

Hi there,
I recently found this great project for documenting Delphi units. Thank you
for the great work.

I'm currently needing the implementation of simplexml file. I downloaded the
lastest version from sourceforge and noticed that some comments aren't
generated in the xml files (like the comments in published properties). Is
there plans to make this work?

Is there any way to contribute to the project with some patches?


Thanks in advance,

Eric

Re: [Pasdoc-main] [ pasdoc-Bugs-2500102 ] Error when parsing Delphi 2009 files with generics

[Hans-Peter D. <DrD...@ao...>]

Michalis Kamburelis schrieb:

>> The zipped exe was rejected (illegal attachment). Should I try 7zip instead?
> 
> That did the trick, uploaded pasdoc2_gui.exe to
> http://pasdoc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/2009-01-18/

Thanks :-)

DoDi

Re: [Pasdoc-main] [ pasdoc-Bugs-2500102 ] Error when parsing Delphi 2009 files with generics

[Michalis K. <mic...@gm...>]

Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote:
[...]
> 
> The docs have not been very helpful :-(

See e.g. https://sourceforge.net/community/forum/topic.php?id=3518 .
There's not much left to add there.

> 
>> Alternatively, just send me through email whatever you want to place
>> there, and I'll upload it there for you :)
> 
> The zipped exe was rejected (illegal attachment). Should I try 7zip instead?
> 

That did the trick, uploaded pasdoc2_gui.exe to
http://pasdoc.sourceforge.net/snapshots/2009-01-18/

Michalis