Re: [Paracomp-devel] Crash in pcSystemFinalize
Brought to you by:
shreekumar
|
From: Stefan E. <eil...@gm...> - 2008-05-14 11:14:58
|
On 14. May 2008, at 12:26, Shree Kumar wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 12:44 +0000, Stefan Eilemann wrote: > >> Regarding the performance: I've retested on my Mac. It seems the >> performance problem is still there: >> >> Eq, rev 1880: >> ./Darwin/test: DB first op: 41.4328 ms (1272.77 MB/s) >> ./Darwin/test: DB second op: 28.1947 ms (1870.36 MB/s) >> ./Darwin/test: DB 15 images: 92.7198 ms (2843.75 MB/s) >> >> >> PC, rev 63: >> ./Darwin/test: DB first op: 39.5884 ms (1332.07 MB/s) >> ./Darwin/test: DB second op: 26.9765 ms (1954.83 MB/s) >> ./Darwin/test: DB 15 images: 87.6801 ms (3007.2 MB/s) >> >> PC, rev 62: >> >> ./Darwin/test: DB first op: 45.064 ms (1170.21 MB/s) >> ./Darwin/test: DB second op: 32.2106 ms (1637.17 MB/s) >> ./Darwin/test: DB 15 images: 111.401 ms (2366.88 MB/s) >> > > PC rev 63 seems to be faster than Eq rev 1880. Am I > missing something ? No - I think it is due to the fact that Eq supports different sizes between the images, which makes the code a bit more complex. > > > Of course, I'm still puzzled about the perf difference between Eq and > rev 63 :-) I assume you meant rev 62?! Cheers, Stefan. -- http://www.eyescale.ch http://www.equalizergraphics.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/eilemann |