Menu
▾
▴
Re: [Pagc-users] NO MATCH on Ottawa request
|
From: The P. u. m. l. <pag...@li...> - 2009-08-19 18:43:34
|
I am note sure what the issue was but I went back and rebuilt the index and now I get similar results to Steve's online example... Cheers > -----Original Message----- > From: The PAGC users mailing list > [mailto:pag...@li...] > Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 12:46 > To: pag...@li... > Subject: Re: [Pagc-users] NO MATCH on Ottawa request > > Ahh a Canadian live sample. GREAT.. This helps me with > comparisons and validating what I am doing. > > The response lines up almost perfectly with google map (of > course people are always going to compare.... > > A couple of tests and I am sure now something is amis. > > If I try 381 dovercourt ave in Ottawa on my local machine I > get 10 results that are all over the place and hardly a match > on google. On your service I get 1 result that is a pretty > close google match... > > The resulting goolge matches are not a big thing for me right > now but the fact your service works well quells my fears. > > questions: > 1. did you re-project the RNF file? (I tried mine as WGS84 > but will probably go back to the default) 2. Does projection > matter from an indexing point of view? > 3. For the placenames did you embed that into the attribute > tables of the RNF or did you build a pseudo parcels layer to > encapsulate place names? (data source?) 4. did you combine > all the provincial RNF's together into one or did you just > grab the full RNF? > 5. Could you run the service using a seprate dataset for each > province eg. <dataSource>streets-ontario</dataSource>. Would > this increase performance? > > Cheers > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: The PAGC users mailing list > > [mailto:pag...@li...] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:49 > > To: pag...@li... > > Subject: Re: [Pagc-users] NO MATCH on Ottawa request > > > > I have all of Canada loaded into PAGC here. This is based > on StatCan > > RNF with some additional work that I have done with it. > > > > Here is a simple form to access it: > > http://imaptools.com/pagc.html > > > > Here is the response I get for "3 Falk Ave, Ottawa, ON" > > http://imaptools.com/cgi-bin/geocode-CA?CompleteAddressNumber= > > 3&CompleteStreetName=falk+ave&PlaceName=ottawa&StateName=ON&Re > > > sponseFormat=XML&methodName=GeocodeRequest&Version=1.1&CountryCode=CA > > > > If you get an exact match then you do not also get fuzzy > results. So > > for example if you enter: "3 Falk, Ottawa, ON" > > ie: leave off the type you get: > > http://imaptools.com/cgi-bin/geocode-CA?CompleteAddressNumber= > > 3&CompleteStreetName=falk&PlaceName=ottawa&StateName=ON&Respon > > seFormat=XML&methodName=GeocodeRequest&Version=1.1&CountryCode=CA > > > > -Steve > > http://imaptools.com/ > > > > The PAGC users mailing list wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hey Folks, > > > > > > Just wanted to try an Ottawa street name and number match > > > (interpolated) and I feel the response is not correct. > > > > > > 1. I used the Ontario RNF file ( > > > > > > http://www.statcan.gc.ca/bsolc/olc-cel/olc-cel?catno=92-500-G&lang=eng > > > > > > <http://www.statcan.gc.ca/bsolc/olc-cel/olc-cel?catno=92-500-G&lang=en > > > g> ) 2. I used the following geomatry to clip Ontario to issolate > > > Ottawa () > > > > > > POLYGON ((-76.102095409501359 > 45.53588445601013,-75.238960733557604 > > > 45.5348701 > > > 96696446,-75.238960733557604 > 45.091638876617218,-76.102095409501359 > > > 45.091638876 > > > 617218,-76.102095409501359 45.53588445601013)) > > > > > > 3. I recompiled PAGC to work only on INTERPOLATION and removed > > > unnecesary Schemas 4. Build the schema using the INTERNAL > > pagc schemas > > > for Stats Can RNF. > > > 5. I submitted the following request > > > > > > > > > http://127.0.0.1/cgi-bin/geocode_response.exe?methodName=GeocodeReques > > > > > > t&Version=1.1&CompleteAddressNumber=3&CompleteStreetName=Falk+Ave&Plac > > > eName=Anywhere&CountryCode=CA > > > > > > <http://127.0.0.1/cgi-bin/geocode_response.exe?methodName=GeocodeReque > > > > > > st&Version=1.1&CompleteAddressNumber=3&CompleteStreetName=Falk+Ave&Pla > > > ceName=Anywhere&CountryCode=CA> > > > > > > 6. received the following response (see bellow > > > > > > 7. here is the results of the attrrbute table for the road I was > > > expecting to get back. > > > > > > RB_UID,C,80 NAME,C,80 TYPE,C,80 DIRECTION,C,80 > > > ADDR_FM_LE,N,32,3 ADDR_TO_LE,N,32,3 > > ADDR_FM_RG,N,32,3 > > > ADDR_TO_RG,N,32,3 > > > > > > 2055809 Falk AVE > > 7 > > > 21 12 28 > > > > > > 2055844 Falk AVE > > 1 > > > 5 4 10 > > > > > > This was another one I would have expected to be returned > > > > > > 2037911 Falkirk CRES > > 1967 > > > 2031 1960 > 2032 > > > > > > Any ideas why these three segments were missed? > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > > ================API Response====================== <?xml > > version="1.0" > > > encoding="UTF-8" ?> > > > > > > <GeocodeService xmlns="http://www.metrogis.org/geocode" > > > xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" > > > xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.metrogis.org/geocode > > GeocodeService.xsd" > > > xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"> > > > > > > <ResponseHeader /> > > > > > > <Response Version="1.1" RequestID=""> > > > > > > <GeocodeResponse><GeocodeResponseList > numberOfGeocodedAddresses="4"> > > > > > > <GeocodedAddress> > > > > > > <Address> > > > > > > <SiteAddress><CompleteAddressNumber>3</CompleteAddressNumber> > > > <CompleteStreetName><StreetName>FABLE</StreetName> > > > > > > <PostType>STREET</PostType></CompleteStreetName></SiteAddress></Addres > > > s> > > > > > > <gml:Point><gml:pos>-75.764288 45.274075</gml:pos></gml:Point> > > > > > > <GeocodeMatchCode accuracy="0.788518" matchType="INTERPOLATED" > > > note=""/> > > > > > > > > > <source><dataSource>pagc_data_ottawa_wgs84</dataSource><addressIdentif > > > ier></addressIdentifier></source></GeocodedAddress> > > > > > > <GeocodedAddress> > > > > > > <Address> > > > > > > <SiteAddress><CompleteAddressNumber>3</CompleteAddressNumber> > > > <CompleteStreetName><StreetName>FRANK</StreetName> > > > > > > <PostType>STREET</PostType></CompleteStreetName></SiteAddress></Addres > > > s> > > > > > > <gml:Point><gml:pos>-75.681606 45.417662</gml:pos></gml:Point> > > > > > > <GeocodeMatchCode accuracy="0.782426" matchType="INTERPOLATED" > > > note=""/> > > > > > > > > > <source><dataSource>pagc_data_ottawa_wgs84</dataSource><addressIdentif > > > ier></addressIdentifier></source></GeocodedAddress> > > > > > > <GeocodedAddress> > > > > > > <Address> > > > > > > <SiteAddress><CompleteAddressNumber>3</CompleteAddressNumber> > > > <CompleteStreetName><StreetName>FOULIS</StreetName> > > > > > > <PostType>CRESCENT</PostType></CompleteStreetName></SiteAddress></Addr > > > ess> > > > > > > <gml:Point><gml:pos>-75.893134 45.296146</gml:pos></gml:Point> > > > > > > <GeocodeMatchCode accuracy="0.718459" matchType="INTERPOLATED" > > > note="P"/> > > > > > > > > > <source><dataSource>pagc_data_ottawa_wgs84</dataSource><addressIdentif > > > ier></addressIdentifier></source></GeocodedAddress> > > > > > > <GeocodedAddress> > > > > > > <Address> > > > > > > <SiteAddress><CompleteAddressNumber>3</CompleteAddressNumber> > > > <CompleteStreetName><StreetName>PHYLIS</StreetName> > > > > > > <PostType>STREET</PostType></CompleteStreetName></SiteAddress></Addres > > > s> > > > > > > <gml:Point><gml:pos>-75.771141 45.277526</gml:pos></gml:Point> > > > > > > <GeocodeMatchCode accuracy="0.688865" matchType="INTERPOLATED" > > > note=""/> > > > > > > > > > <source><dataSource>pagc_data_ottawa_wgs84</dataSource><addressIdentif > > > ier></addressIdentifier></source></GeocodedAddress> > > > > > > </GeocodeResponseList> > > > > > > </GeocodeResponse> > > > > > > <requestedAddress> > > > > > > <CompleteAddressNumber>3</CompleteAddressNumber> > > > <CompleteStreetName>Falk Ave</CompleteStreetName> > > > <PlaceName>Anywhere</PlaceName></requestedAddress> > > > > > > </Response></GeocodeService> > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -------- Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal > > > Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, > integration > > > and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application > > > coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. > > > http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > > > > > > > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > -- > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Pagc-users mailing list > > > Pag...@li... > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pagc-users > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > ---------------- > > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal > Reports 2008 > > 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and > deployment > > - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover > > what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > > _______________________________________________ > > Pagc-users mailing list > > Pag...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pagc-users > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal > Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, > integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, > core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal > Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Pagc-users mailing list > Pag...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/pagc-users > |