|
From: Dennis B. <cha...@gm...> - 2015-07-28 13:25:03
|
I find this a little confusing too. What's the difference between radius / port-security using ProCurve switches ? I thought port-security only detects the "intrusion" of a new device on a port and authentication is already handled usind radius... Has the term "port-security" the same meaning/function for ProCurve and say Cisco switches ? regards Dennis 2015-07-27 15:39 GMT+02:00 Louis Munro <lm...@in...>: > > > On Jul 25, 2015, at 6:03 , Polar Geek <pol...@gm...> wrote: > > Louis, > > Thanks for the reply. > > > > I’ll make the change to that setup. But I will say that as a new user having port security described as the recommended method in the Network Devices Configuration Guide is confusing if it is a deprecated standard. > > > > > Hi Paul, > You are right. > That part of the documentation needs work. > > In general at this point RADIUS should be the first thing people try and > then use port security only if they have a good reason why that wouldn’t > work. > > That needs to be made explicit. > > Regards, > -- > Louis Munro > lm...@in... :: www.inverse.ca > +1.514.447.4918 x125 :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125 > Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence ( > www.packetfence.org) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > PacketFence-users mailing list > Pac...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users > > -- ------------------------------- oben Balken, unten Balken ! ------------------------------- |