Re: [PacketFence-users] ProCurve 2530 error

[Dennis B. <cha...@gm...>]

I find this a little confusing too.
What's the difference between radius / port-security using ProCurve
switches ?
I thought port-security only detects the "intrusion" of a new device on a
port and authentication is already handled usind radius...
Has the term "port-security" the same meaning/function for ProCurve and say
Cisco switches ?

regards
Dennis

2015-07-27 15:39 GMT+02:00 Louis Munro <lm...@in...>:

>
>
> On Jul 25, 2015, at 6:03 , Polar Geek <pol...@gm...> wrote:
>
> Louis,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
>
>
> I’ll make the change to that setup. But I will say that as a new user having port security described as the recommended method in the Network Devices Configuration Guide is confusing if it is a deprecated standard.
>
>
>
>
> Hi Paul,
> You are right.
> That part of the documentation needs work.
>
> In general at this point RADIUS should be the first thing people try and
> then use port security only if they have a good reason why that wouldn’t
> work.
>
> That needs to be made explicit.
>
> Regards,
> --
> Louis Munro
> lm...@in...  ::  www.inverse.ca
> +1.514.447.4918 x125  :: +1 (866) 353-6153 x125
> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence (
> www.packetfence.org)
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> Pac...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>
>


-- 
-------------------------------
oben Balken, unten Balken !
-------------------------------