Re: [PacketFence-users] pfsetvlan ERROR

SourceForge Headquarters 1320 Columbia Street Suite 310 San Diego, CA 92101 +1 (858) 422-6466

Hi

Just wondering if there is any progress on this issue, I am getting the same issue running 5.2 (stable) on ubuntu 12.04 (fresh install) switch is Dlink DGS-3210 


Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Instantiate a new iptables modification method. pf::ipset (pf::inline::get_technique)
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: saving existing iptables to /usr/local/pf/var/iptables.bak (pf::iptables::iptables_save)
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) WARN: We are using IPSET (pf::ipset::iptables_generate)
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: flushing iptables (pf::ipset::iptables_flush_mangle)
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: restoring iptables from /usr/local/pf/var/conf/iptables.conf (pf::iptables::iptables_restore)
Jul 09 19:51:36 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfdhcplistener_eth0.1 took 0.006 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:38 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfdhcplistener_eth0.3 took 0.008 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:41 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfdhcplistener_eth0 took 0.010 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:43 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfdns took 0.007 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:48 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfmon took 2.414 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:48 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: generating /usr/local/pf/var/conf/snmptrapd.conf (pf::services::manager::snmptrapd::generateConfig)
Jul 09 19:51:48 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon snmptrapd took 0.044 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:50 pfsetvlan(7779) INFO: pfsetvlan starting and writing 7780 to /usr/local/pf/var/run/pfsetvlan.pid (pf::services::util::createpid)
Jul 09 19:51:50 pfsetvlan(7779) INFO: Process started (main::)
Jul 09 19:51:50 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon pfsetvlan took 2.283 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:52 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon radiusd took 2.126 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:52 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon radsniff3 took 0.094 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:52 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon statsd took 0.008 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:52 pfcmd.pl(6974) INFO: Daemon winbindd-Archerfish.conf took 0.023 seconds to start. (pf::services::manager::launchService)
Jul 09 19:51:59 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new" at (eval 2111) line 47.
 (main::)
Jul 09 19:52:23 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new" at (eval 2111) line 47.
 (main::)
Jul 09 19:53:31 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new" at (eval 2111) line 47.
 (main::)


Cheers

Andrew


> On 17 Jun 2015, at 6:08 am, Hugo Rodenburg <ma...@hu...> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I just found out there is an open issue on github regarding this: https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/issues/655
> I think it makes more sense to track this in the github issue tracker, since it is already an filed bug.
> 
> Hugo
> 
> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>>> Hi James,
>>> 
>>> Thanks for your reply. It resolves the errors when starting pfsetvlan, but the
>>> initial error remains:
>>> 
>>> Jun 15 20:03:34 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>> recursion on subroutine
>>> "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
>>> at (eval 2124) line 47.
>>> (main::)
>>> Jun 15 20:03:34 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>> recursion on subroutine
>>> "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
>>> at (eval 2124) line 47.
>>> (main::)
>>> 
>>> 
>>> What I am wondering is how my setup is different from any other ones, since this
>>> is quite a standard setup I think? I assume this error is normally not
>>> triggered (because otherwise everyone would have run into this)?
>>> Does it make sense to try the latest snapshot?
>> 
>> Tried the latest snapshot anyway (took a snap of the vm PF is running on), but
>> that didn't make any difference.
>> 
>>> 
>>> Thanks again.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Hugo
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Apply the following patch on top of the previous one.
>>>> 
>>>> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/10edc098f9f9c6360ca322c9a17571b24dbe5a11.diff
>>>> 
>>>> James Rouzier
>>>> jro...@in... :: +1.514.755.3630  ::  http://www.inverse.ca
>>>> Inverse inc. :: Leaders behind SOGo (http://www.sogo.nu) and PacketFence
>>>> (http://www.packetfence.org)
>>>> 
>>>> On 2015-06-14 5:08 PM, Hugo Rodenburg wrote:
>>>>> Hi Fabrice,
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks for the quick response!
>>>>> 
>>>>>> let's try that:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> https://github.com/inverse-inc/packetfence/commit/8830ddb52225d85d1ee36d30e466c764e47bfd17.diff
>>>>>> 
>>>>> #/usr/local/pf$ sudo patch -p1 < ~/8830ddb52225d85d1ee36d30e466c764e47bfd17.diff
>>>>> patching file addons/accounting.pl
>>>>> patching file addons/recovery.pl
>>>>> patching file lib/pf/CHI.pm
>>>>> patching file sbin/pfsetvlan
>>>>> 
>>>>> However:
>>>>> 
>>>>> /usr/local/pf$ bin/pfcmd service pfsetvlan start
>>>>> Subroutine get_logger redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Log/Any/Test.pm line 13.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Fast : Can't locate
>>>>> Test/Deep.pm in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/pf/lib /etc/perl
>>>>> /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2 /usr/lib/perl5
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14
>>>>> /usr/local/lib/site_perl) at /usr/share/perl5/Module/Runtime.pm line 317.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm line 7.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 381) line 2.
>>>>> 	...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Fast.pm line 8.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 377) line 2.
>>>>>  at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Base : Attempt to
>>>>> reload CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm aborted.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 382) line 2.
>>>>>  at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::libmemcached :
>>>>> Invalid CODE attribute: Test(shutdown => 2) at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line 20.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line 20.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 383) line 2.
>>>>>  at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> ...
>>>>> 
>>>>> Ok, so I installed the (apparantly) missing perl lib:
>>>>> $ sudo apt-get install libtest-deep-perl
>>>>> 
>>>>> But, still no luck:
>>>>> 
>>>>> #/usr/local/pf$ bin/pfcmd service pfsetvlan restart
>>>>> Subroutine get_logger redefined at /usr/share/perl5/Log/Any/Test.pm line 13.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Fast : Base class
>>>>> package "Test::Class" is empty.
>>>>>     (Perhaps you need to 'use' the module which defines that package first,
>>>>>     or make that module available in @INC (@INC contains: /usr/local/pf/lib
>>>>>     /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/perl/5.14.2 /usr/local/share/perl/5.14.2
>>>>>     /usr/lib/perl5 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/perl/5.14 /usr/share/perl/5.14
>>>>>     /usr/local/lib/site_perl).
>>>>>  at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Test/Class.pm line 7.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Test/Class.pm line 7.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 387) line 2.
>>>>> 	...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/share/perl5/CHI/t/Driver.pm line 17.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 385) line 2.
>>>>> 	...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm line 8.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 381) line 2.
>>>>> 	...propagated at /usr/share/perl/5.14/base.pm line 93.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Fast.pm line 8.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 377) line 2.
>>>>>  at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::Base : Attempt to
>>>>> reload CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/Base.pm aborted.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 389) line 2.
>>>>>  at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> Couldn't require CHI::Driver::Memcached::t::CHIDriverTests::libmemcached :
>>>>> Invalid CODE attribute: Test(shutdown => 2) at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line 20.
>>>>> BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at
>>>>> /usr/share/perl5/CHI/Driver/Memcached/t/CHIDriverTests/libmemcached.pm line 20.
>>>>> Compilation failed in require at (eval 390) line 2.
>>>>>  at /usr/share/perl/5.14/Module/Pluggable.pm line 28.
>>>>> service|command
>>>>> pfsetvlan|stop
>>>>> 
>>>>> Am I missing an dependency?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Hugo
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Le 2015-06-14 13:28, Hugo Rodenburg a écrit :
>>>>>>> Hi louis and list,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Hello Experts
>>>>>>>> I am testing packetfence vlan enforcement with an hp procurve 2524 switch and an
>>>>>>>> ubuntu 12.04 lts desktop version (which is being used as the packetfence 5.0.1
>>>>>>>> server).
>>>>>>>> I have configured the registration vlan(eth0.2), isolation vlan(eth0.3), and
>>>>>>>> management vlan(eth0) interfaces.
>>>>>>>> I have defined my switch in the packetfence server.
>>>>>>>> on my switch i have vlan1(default vlan),
>>>>>>>> vlan2(registration),vlan3(isolation),vlan4(macdetection),vlan10(guest).
>>>>>>>> port-security has been activated on the switch ports
>>>>>>>> this is the output of my snmptrapd.log when i run the command
>>>>>>>> # tail -f snmptrapd.log
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:24:19|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:24:30|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:25:26|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:25:43|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:16|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:18|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:33|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:35|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:38|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 2 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> 2015-04-27|06:26:49|UDP: [192.168.0.1]:161->[192.168.0.2]|192.168.0.1|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>>> 3 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE 0 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS S
>>>>>>>> this is the output of my packetfence.log when i run the command
>>>>>>>> # tail -f packetfence.log
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: modify of non-existent node
>>>>>>>> 00:11:22:33:44:55 attempted - node added (pf::node::node_modify)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: Static User-Agent lookup data
>>>>>>>> initialized (pf::useragent::_init)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) WARN: Unable to perform a Fingerbank lookup
>>>>>>>> for device with MAC address '00:11:22:33:44:55' (pf::fingerbank)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 06:42:56 httpd.portal(10766) INFO: [00:11:22:33:44:55] redirected to
>>>>>>>> authentication page on isolation portal (captiveportal::PacketFence)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(6) ERROR: Thread 6 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>>>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>>>>>>>> (main::)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(7) ERROR: Thread 7 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>>>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>>>>>>>> (main::)
>>>>>>>> Apr 27 07:23:12 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>>>>>>> recursion on subroutine "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::U.
>>>>>>>> (main::)
>>>>>>>> in my understanding of the snmptrapd.log, i think packetfence can communicate
>>>>>>>> with the switch
>>>>>>>> but pfsetvlan error is what i dont understand.
>>>>>>>> please help me out, i would be very glad if i hear form you sooner.
>>>>>>> I'm having the same issue. I did a fresh install of packetfence 5.1.0 on Ubuntu
>>>>>>> 12.04, instead of upgrading my existing 4.x installation. The setup is using
>>>>>>> routed networks (previously non-routed), but I don't think this is relevant for
>>>>>>> this issue.
>>>>>>> In an attempt to rule out any configuration issue, i purged the packetfence
>>>>>>> packages and did a fresh reinstall, with only setting up using the web-wizard.
>>>>>>> I'm using an HP Procurve 2600 template (Procurve 2610 switch). After connecting
>>>>>>> a device, snmptrap log shows:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/snmptrapd.log <==
>>>>>>> 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP: [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>> 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .5 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>>>>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.4.20 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 12|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.5.20 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.6.20 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.3.0.20 = STRING:
>>>>>>> "http://10.12.45.61/cgi/fDetail?index=20"|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.11.1.7.2.1.3.20
>>>>>>> = INTEGER: 2 END VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>>>>> 2015-06-14|17:02:54|UDP: [10.12.45.61]:161->[172.29.1.66]|10.12.45.61|BEGIN TYPE
>>>>>>> 6 END TYPE BEGIN SUBTYPE .1 END SUBTYPE BEGIN VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>>>>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.2.1.2 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.3.1.2 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 2|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.4.1.2 = Hex-STRING: D8 D3 85 04 FA 5D
>>>>>>> |.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.6.1.2 = INTEGER:
>>>>>>> 1|.1.3.6.1.4.1.11.2.14.2.10.2.1.7.1.2 = INTEGER: 1 END VARIABLEBINDINGS
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> And then packetfence.log shows:
>>>>>>> ==> /usr/local/pf/logs/packetfence.log <==
>>>>>>> Jun 14 19:02:58 pfsetvlan(8) ERROR: Thread 8 terminated abnormally: Deep
>>>>>>> recursion on subroutine
>>>>>>> "CHI::Driver::File__WITH__CHI::Driver::Role::Universal__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::FileUmask__AND__pf::Role::CHI::Driver::Untaint__AND__CHI::Driver::Role::HasSubcaches::new"
>>>>>>> at (eval 2047) line 47.
>>>>>>>   (main::)
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> It doesn't matter if I configure the switch within Packetfence or not, it just
>>>>>>> throws the same error.
>>>>>>> I tried to find out what is going wrong, but I still can't figure it out (yes,
>>>>>>> quite frustrating :))
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Does anyone has any clue? Am I overlooking something? louis, did you figure this
>>>>>>> out perhaps?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hugo
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>>> Pac...@li...
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>>> Pac...@li...
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>>> Pac...@li...
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>>> Pac...@li...
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>>> 
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>>> Pac...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
>> 
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> PacketFence-users mailing list
>> Pac...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> PacketFence-users mailing list
> Pac...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/packetfence-users