[Oslib-devel] Re: ABORT 64 and time

[Paolo G. <pao...@ti...>]

> Is it ok if I remove the cli()/sti() from irq_bind() (it is the only
> oslib function that protects itself with cli/sti)? In this way, the
> responsibility for locking/unlocking is left to the kernel (right now,
> this seems to me the correct thing to do...).
> 
> Also, this would answer the "open question" in oq.txt (I forgot about it
> ;-).

>From my point of view, it should be that OSLib functions are not
protected with cli/sti.

That is, it is responsability of the upper layer (the kernel) to disable
the interrupts when needed.

That is at least what I always thought when I implemented the shark
kernel layer...

bye

PJ

-- 
Paolo Gai <pao...@ti...>
Scuola S. Anna