Re: [osera-isp-dev] bricks use case descriptions

[Ed H. <ed...@mo...>]

Rick:  

 

A very simple reminder: we were only required to develop “Add” and “Update” use case descriptions and use case models.  Anything beyond that – and we have delivered a lot more – is gravy.  “Validate Technology Policy” IMHO appears to be outside the scope of our capabilities or capacity.  I would think that a validated Technical Policy would need to be in place and would be reflected in the choices that were made in the process.

 

Also, I thought that we had discussed, early on in our discussions, that we were NOT to build an application (based on use cases) that would be part of the decision process…our Bricks application, as reflected in our understanding of the SOW and as we submitted our (accepted) proposal, was to only reflect decisions that had been already made.

 

I submit that your request is out of scope for the current requirements.  We will be happy to consider it, but it will require additional funding.  If appropriate, I’ll submit this to the CO.

 

Regards,

Ed Harrington

Mobile: +1.757.342.4552        email: ed...@mo... <mailto:ed...@mo...> 

www.modeldriven.com <http://www.modeldriven.com>  

Disclaimer: Privileged or Confidential information may be contained in this message or with any files transferred with it.  If you are not the intended recipient, kindly destroy this message and notify the sender by return mail.  Opinions, conclusions and other information included in this message that do not relate to the official business of Model Driven Solutions are neither given nor endorsed by it.

 

From: ose...@li... [mailto:ose...@li...] On Behalf Of ric...@gs...
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2008 9:35 PM
To: ose...@li...
Cc: Walt Melo
Subject: [osera-isp-dev] bricks use case descriptions

 

Jim, Irene, Rob or Reddy:

I have entered the use case descriptions in MagicDraw. Just two things:

1. The Bricks PIM in subversion is missing the ValidateTechnologyPolicy use case including the model  and the diagram. Also, there's no description in the use case document. Jim, would you mind updating the model and diagram ? Irene, I assume you're writing the descriptions.

Just a heads up, I have checked out the BricksPIM from subversion, so we'll have to synchronize.

2. Rob: Would you mind setting me ( rmurphy ) up with write permissions so I can commit.

Jim, I'll let you know when I get my commit permissions. If I get them early tomorrow, I may be able to execute my commit before you make any mods.

Sorry for the short notice, but I'll be presenting the bricks use cases to the ITAPC Thursday, so we'll come off better if we're done by then.

Best wishes,

Rick

office: 202-501-9199
cell: 202-557-1604