Re: [orbitcpp-list] orbit requires gcc 2.95.2+?

[<la...@se...>]

Phil Dawes wrote:

> Installing libstdc++-compat-2.95.2-3.i386.rpm sorted these sort of
> problems for me.

Thanks for your thorough and thoughtful reply some time ago.
It took me awhile to exaust all the possibilities, but I can not
seem to get a compiler combo to compile orbitcpp-0.29's 'test'
programs (although the rest such as 'compiler' and ' orb'
compiler just fine).  While I wasn't able to exactly replicate
your system (I'm running SGI's  version of redhat 6.1 linux
which had the 2.91 compilers), I came up with these RPMs:

cpp-2.95.2-4tr.i586.rpm      libstdc++-2.95.2-4tr.i586.rpm
gcc-2.95.2-4tr.i586.rpm      libstdc++-compat-2.95.2-4tr.i586.rpm
gcc-c++-2.95.2-4tr.i586.rpm  libstdc++-devel-2.95.2-4tr.i586.rpm

but I get errors compiling the 'test' programs, such as in 'boolean':

/include -I/usr/include     -g -O0 -Wall -c boolean-cpp-common.cc
In file included from boolean-cpp-stubs.hh:11,
                 from boolean-cpp-common.cc:6:
boolean-cpp-common.hh:21: parse error before `<'
boolean-cpp-common.hh:22: parse error before `<'
make[1]: *** [boolean-cpp-common.o] Error 1

I'm sticking with orbitcpp-0.26 which works fine with me!

The main problem I'm having (clients hanging on a reply
from a dead server) is with orbit's generated 'C' files and
not with the generated 'C++' files.  I'm bemuzed as to how
anyone has seriously used orbit in a fault-tolerant way!

Thanks again, always, and anyways,  -Lance.

_______________________________________________

> orbitcpp-list mailing list
> orb...@li...
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/mailman/listinfo/orbitcpp-list

--
-=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=-
Lance Welsh              la...@se...
Seascape Communications  (650) 327-6890
-=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=--=+=-