Re: [orbitcpp-list] questions

[Phil d. <ph...@us...>]

Andreas Kloeckner wrote:
> 
> Hi Phil,
> 
> 
> * do you still have a copy of o2cpp handy? if yes, have a look at the
> following:

I've got o2cpp-0.10

> - lang_c.cc: duplicateGuarded,releaseGuarded. prevents missing
> exceptions.

Yep. That's good.

> - o2cpp_smartptr.hh: what about taking this implementation instead of
> all the "nicked from mico&omniorb" stuff? (pro: wchar support, nice and
> consistent; con: breaks existing code)

<glances through code>
Is it completely spec compliant? Tested? (I spent very little time
looking at the mico code - I nicked it because it was already fairly
complete and tested)

It looks good to me, I have no problem with replacing the existing code
with this (s/o2cpp/orbitcpp/g etc..) in an orbitcpp_smartptr.hh file or
something.
How does this break existing code? What stops us from just bolting this
in?

> - o2cpp_exception.hh: looks more complete than yours

Yep, and I like the cEnvironment class. Feel free to replace the
exception code with this.

Cheers,

Phil.