From: Maynard J. <may...@us...> - 2014-08-11 18:16:56
|
On 08/08/2014 12:37 PM, Maynard Johnson wrote: > On 08/08/2014 12:26 PM, Andreas Arnez wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 08 2014, Maynard Johnson wrote: >> >>> Andreas, >>> Please see if this patch works for you. If you see anything wrong or >>> something you'd like changed, please let me know. I see many more >>> events defined in arch/s390/kernel/perf_cpum_cf_events.c. I'll leave >>> the decision to you whether or not to add support for those now (or >>> maybe later, post-1.0 release). >> >> The patch looks good. The problems I've struggled with seem to be fixed >> by the patch. I don't see an urgent need to support more events right >> now; this can be done post-1.0 release. >> >> Thanks again for your help! > Thanks, Andreas. Since the patch is intended for operf/ocount use and is > mutually exclusive with opcontrol being present, I will wait until I commit > the opcontrol-removal patch before I commit this one. Patch committed. -Maynard > > -Maynard >> >> -- >> Andreas >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Want fast and easy access to all the code in your enterprise? Index and > search up to 200,000 lines of code with a free copy of Black Duck > Code Sight - the same software that powers the world's largest code > search on Ohloh, the Black Duck Open Hub! Try it now. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/bds > _______________________________________________ > oprofile-list mailing list > opr...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oprofile-list > |