From: Andi K. <an...@fi...> - 2010-04-04 10:01:22
|
On Thu, Apr 01, 2010 at 03:11:24PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 21:02 +0200, Robert Richter wrote: > > On 01.04.10 03:17:25, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > Got confirmation now this patch fixes most of the dropped oprofile > > > samples problem on a particular intensive test on a large system. > > > So now submitting the previous RFC formally. > > > .34 / Stable candidate. > > > > Thanks Andi, will take a look at this next week. > > Note, I just sent out a patch set yesterday which will conflict with > this change. > > I Cc'd both you and Andi on that patch. Steve, is your ring buffer patch intended for stable? I plan to submit the oprofile patch for stable and if your is not it would be more convenient if your patch was based on mine instead of the other way round. If yours is for stable I can rebase on top of yours. Thanks, -Andi -- ak...@li... -- Speaking for myself only. |